- Dec 10, 2013
- 528
- 0
- 0
What has been pretty much highly suspected by the alternative media for many years is now confirmed with documents and a CDC whistleblower's explanation in which he admits he was lying, he went along with being silent about the findings in a particular report that found MMR vaccine to cause Autims 3.6 times more likely in children aged less than 36 months, it still causes Autism later which probably depends how healthy the child's food is. He also said that he feels horrible about going along with it, so he did this.
Ofcourse it has all to do with the immune system which is more powerful with age, children aged below 5 years should not receive any vaccine at all imo.
http://www.naturalnews.com/046535_MMR_vaccines_autism_CDC_whistleblower.html
Short Movie:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhpckzxVEoc
Dr. Hooker published the real findings of that report on August 10, 2014, which is here:
http://www.translationalneurodegeneration.com/content/3/1/16/abstract
Radio Interivew with Dr. Brian Hooker who received the whistleblower's messages:
- Tomorrow Wednesday on The Robert Scott Bell Show at 7-9PM EDT
Lastly ... if that's big enough, the other thing has to do with possible racial discrimination (which means the vaccine was designed to target a particular racial group) - that the occurance for black children is 2 times that amount, therefore ~6.8 times compared to 3.4 in white children, to later develop autism.
Alone it seems innocent, but when you look at how many black babies were aborted in the US, along with the quotes, it doesn't seem like a baseless suspicion.
This is the CDC Vaccine Time Chart - Notice MMR is at 12-15 months.
This ofcourse doesn't mean that other vaccines are safe, and just he MMR is not, it basically questions all of them, but they always were anyways, we all know that to be the case from witness accounts and other evidence, as well as historical aspect of the whole medical model, just the fact that they offcially list using methanal, aluminum, mercury and others, which they call "preservatives". That alone pretty much defeats the purpose of good health. But what's better than a direct quote from the manufacturer http://youtu.be/DmPQtizSjvU?t=6m56s
The whole thing is basically such a joke that none of the vaccies have any trust whatsoever, which ofcourse enables various jokes and crudely funny shocking competitions like these to come out. Alarms are raised to avoid them at all costs for those who are worried about disease, but I also believe if a vaccine would be forced the people who fully understand the conspiracy they would probably respond with the Second Amendment as well if necessary. There is so much evidence that is spread around in bits that if you put it all together it's , that's the same way law enforcement cracks a murder case, by connecting the dots, and in court, circumstantial evidence is a valid piece of proof.
Example of Influenza Vaccine Warning - "not established for children under 4 years of age."
Most genuine conspiracy theories have to focus on circumstantial evidence, that's ofcourse because the hard evidence is actively destroyed or hidden by the guilty. They don't mind about the little dots, because they know most people are too dumb to connect them together, they ofcourse make sure that most of the public is dumb enough, by using chemical and psychological weapons, such as fluoridated water, aspartame, MSG, GMOs, weaponized advertising, movies, music, sports and celebrity worship.
Maybe you're asking a question at the end of all this - WHY IS THIS NOT IN THE PRESS ? - That's because the truth is:
-----------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------
Updates:
The revised statistical report's view from a Journal (TN), because of an "investigation" has been removed.
The note also appears to say that in the meantime a PDF of the full document is available to download, however the provided link offers a 404 error.
http://www.naturalnews.com/046629_scientific_censorship_Brian_Hooker_science_journals.html
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
----------------------------------------------------------
Update 2:
Press Release from the Whistleblower:
Ofcourse it has all to do with the immune system which is more powerful with age, children aged below 5 years should not receive any vaccine at all imo.
http://www.naturalnews.com/046535_MMR_vaccines_autism_CDC_whistleblower.html
Short Movie:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhpckzxVEoc
Dr. Hooker published the real findings of that report on August 10, 2014, which is here:
http://www.translationalneurodegeneration.com/content/3/1/16/abstract
Radio Interivew with Dr. Brian Hooker who received the whistleblower's messages:
- Tomorrow Wednesday on The Robert Scott Bell Show at 7-9PM EDT
Lastly ... if that's big enough, the other thing has to do with possible racial discrimination (which means the vaccine was designed to target a particular racial group) - that the occurance for black children is 2 times that amount, therefore ~6.8 times compared to 3.4 in white children, to later develop autism.
Alone it seems innocent, but when you look at how many black babies were aborted in the US, along with the quotes, it doesn't seem like a baseless suspicion.
"Several years ago, when 17,000 aborted babies were found in a dumpster outside a pathology laboratory in Los, Angeles, California, some 12-15,000 were observed to be black."
--Erma Clardy Craven (deceased)
Social Worker and Civil Rights Leader
This is the CDC Vaccine Time Chart - Notice MMR is at 12-15 months.
This ofcourse doesn't mean that other vaccines are safe, and just he MMR is not, it basically questions all of them, but they always were anyways, we all know that to be the case from witness accounts and other evidence, as well as historical aspect of the whole medical model, just the fact that they offcially list using methanal, aluminum, mercury and others, which they call "preservatives". That alone pretty much defeats the purpose of good health. But what's better than a direct quote from the manufacturer http://youtu.be/DmPQtizSjvU?t=6m56s
The whole thing is basically such a joke that none of the vaccies have any trust whatsoever, which ofcourse enables various jokes and crudely funny shocking competitions like these to come out. Alarms are raised to avoid them at all costs for those who are worried about disease, but I also believe if a vaccine would be forced the people who fully understand the conspiracy they would probably respond with the Second Amendment as well if necessary. There is so much evidence that is spread around in bits that if you put it all together it's , that's the same way law enforcement cracks a murder case, by connecting the dots, and in court, circumstantial evidence is a valid piece of proof.
Example of Influenza Vaccine Warning - "not established for children under 4 years of age."
Most genuine conspiracy theories have to focus on circumstantial evidence, that's ofcourse because the hard evidence is actively destroyed or hidden by the guilty. They don't mind about the little dots, because they know most people are too dumb to connect them together, they ofcourse make sure that most of the public is dumb enough, by using chemical and psychological weapons, such as fluoridated water, aspartame, MSG, GMOs, weaponized advertising, movies, music, sports and celebrity worship.
Maybe you're asking a question at the end of all this - WHY IS THIS NOT IN THE PRESS ? - That's because the truth is:
-----------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------
Updates:
The revised statistical report's view from a Journal (TN), because of an "investigation" has been removed.
The note also appears to say that in the meantime a PDF of the full document is available to download, however the provided link offers a 404 error.
http://www.naturalnews.com/046629_scientific_censorship_Brian_Hooker_science_journals.html
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
----------------------------------------------------------
Update 2:
Press Release from the Whistleblower:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE-AUGUST 27,2014
STATEMENT OF WILLIAM W. THOMPSON, Ph.D., REGARDING THE 2004 ARTICLE EXAMINING THE POSSIBILITY OF A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MMR VACCINE AND AUTISM
My name is William Thompson. I am a Senior Scientist with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, where I have worked since 1998.
I regret that my coauthors and I omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the journal Pediatrics. The omitted data suggested that African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism. Decisions were made regarding which findings to report after the data were collected, and I believe that the final study protocol was not followed.
I want to be absolutely clear that I believe vaccines have saved and continue to save countless lives. I would never suggest that any parent avoid vaccinating children of any race. Vaccines prevent serious diseases, and the risks associated with their administration are vastly outweighed by their individual and societal benefits.
My concern has been the decision to omit relevant findings in a particular study for a particular sub* group for a particular vaccine. There have always been recognized risks for vaccination and I believe it is the responsibility of the CDC to properly convey the risks associated with receipt of those vaccines.
I have had many discussions with Dr. Brian Hooker over the last 10 months regarding studies the CDC has carried out regarding vaccines and neurodevelopmental outcomes including autism spectrum disorders. I share his belief that CDC decision-making and analyses should be transparent. I was not, however, aware that he was recording any of our conversations, nor was I given any choice regarding whether my name would be made public or my voice would be put on the Internet.
I am grateful for the many supportive e-mails that I have received over the last several days.
I will not be answering further questions at this time. I am providing information to Congressman William Posey, and of course will continue to cooperate with Congress. I have also offered to assist with reanalysis of the study data or development of further studies. For the time being, however, I am focused on my job and my family.
Reasonable scientists can and do differ in their interpretation of information. I will do everything I can to assist any unbiased and objective scientists inside or outside the CDC to analyze data collected by the CDC or other public organizations for the purpose of understanding whether vaccines are associated with an increased risk of autism. There are still more questions than answers, and I appreciate that so many families are looking for answers from the scientific community.
My colleagues and supervisors at the CDC have been entirely professional since this matter became public. In fact, I received a performance-based award after this story came out. I have experienced no pressure or retaliation and certainly was not escorted from the building, as some have stated.
Dr. Thompson is represented by Frederick M. Morgan, Jr., Morgan Verkamp, LLC, Cincinnati, Ohio, www.morganverkamp.com.
Last edited: