Anyone see this article over at Toms posted today:
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-bulldozer-cpu-fx-series-motherboard,13342.html
Basically says this: (Name, Freq, L2cache, core name, stepping, thermal envelope, system bus, bios revision)
"AMD FX-8150 3600MHz 1MBx8 Bulldozer B2 125W 5200 F4
AMD FX-8120 3100MHz 1MBx8 Bulldozer B2 125W 5200 F4
AMD FX-8120 3100MHz 1MBx8 Bulldozer B2 95W 5200 F4
AMD FX-8100 2800MHz 1MBx8 Bulldozer B2 95W 5200 F4
AMD FX-6100 3300MHz 1MBx6 Bulldozer B2 95W 5200 F4
AMD FX-4100 3600MHz 1MBx4 Bulldozer B2 95W 5200 F4
The FX-8150 is clocked at 3.6 GHz, 8-cores, TDP of 125W and system bus at 5200 MT/s (up from 4000 MT/s of previous generations). You'll notice the FX-8120 listed both TDP of 125W and 95W. You should expect on initial launch, the 125W TDP models will be the first to the market, later followed by the 95W TDP chips.
The FX-6100 is clocked at 3.3 GHz, 6-cores, TDP of 95W, along with system bus at 5200 MT/s. The FX-4100 is clocked at 3.6 GHz, 4-cores, TDP of 95W, along with bus at 5200 MT/s. One might begin to piece together that the FX-6100 and FX-4100 are likely to be Zambezi with 1 module and 2 modules disabled, respectively, rather than native 3-module / 2-module dies. (Do I see an unlocked FX-4100 to an FX-8150 in my future?)
All CPUs feature 8MB L3 cache and are based on 32nm process"