Fudzilla: Snapdragon 835's second cluster is a Cortex A53

[dark zero]

Snapdragon 835's second cluster is a Cortex A53

4x Kryo 280 and 4x Cortex A53

Ever since Fudzilla received confirmation that the Snapdragon 835 will be an eight-core 10nm processor, we wondered about the power-efficient cluster. Now we can confirm that one performance cluster is made from four Kryo 280 cores and the second is powered by Cortex A53 cores.

Kryo 280 is an upgraded Kryo 200 core manufactured at 10nm. According to Qualcomm, the chip requires some 25 percent less power compared to the Kyro 200 based Snapdragon 820. The fact that the new SoC has eight cores means the power cluster will dramatically help battery life.


Source: http://www.fudzilla.com/news/mobile/42646-snapdragon-835-second-cluster-is-cortex-a53
-------------
And here goes nothing.... Snapdragon 835 ended to be a dissapoint for me....

The ARM A53 cores are as fast as the Pentium 4 cores and the instructions are not followed by the same order than the Kryo 280. What happened Qualcomm?

 

[Andrei.]

What is that updated Kryo bullshit. It's an A73 A53 SoC.

 

[Lodix]

This is all uninformed... From Qualcomm specs it says 8x kryo 280 cores. They are rebranding "Stock" ARM cores.

 

[dark zero]

This is all uninformed... From Qualcomm specs it says 8x kryo 280 cores. They are rebranding "Stock" ARM cores.

Actually it was supposed to be similar than Kryo / Snapdragon 820: 2 arrays of Qualcomm self made cores with all the instructions made specifically for Windows (out of order instructions on all the cores)

Also people expected that the 2nd cluster were to be the downclocked original Kryo as the secondary cores. Yeah, somewhat crazy, but all of them would be high performers.

Sadly if this is true, Snapdragon 835 would be a massive dissapoint for everyone and would make the Mediatek Helio X30 looks better due the Energy saving ARM A35 cores.

And if that overheats like the Snapdragon 810... They are done for.

 

[StrangerGuy]

It's amazing how the tables turned against QC in just 3 years. "64-bit iz uselezz", 810 space heater, then 14nm custom beaten by a stock budget 28nm ARM and just how many of 835s they think they can ship into devices that isn't branded Samsung this year?

Their only saving grace is their modem, and I doubt that superiority will last long either.

 

[dark zero]

It's amazing how the tables turned against QC in just 3 years. "64-bit iz uselezz", 810 space heater, then 14nm custom beaten by a stock budget 28nm ARM and just how many of 835s they think they can ship into devices that isn't branded Samsung this year?

Their only saving grace is their modem, and I doubt that superiority will last long either.

And the saving shot is Mediatek Helio X30 defeating QC CPU wise... the only grace from QC is their GPU.

If only Mediatek could gave an Hexacore Power VR GPU... They would managed to get near QC GPU levels...

 

[lopri]

Shhh... ARM went a mile to save Qualcomm's face by creating a "new" licensing scheme.. It's supposed to be a secret!

 

[lopri]

To be fair, though, they still have Adreno and Modem patents, neither of which has a strong competitor yet. And highly motivated army of lawyers.

 

[core2slow]

Qualcomm is locked in a bunch of litigations right now over unfair licensing practices so I wouldn't put it past them for doing a quick flip on the SD835. Sooner or later, they'll just be another patent troll living off of patent royalties and no innovation.

 

[dark zero]

Qualcomm wants to commit suicide and leave Kirin take the Throne?

Or even Mediatek is catching up!

 

[Arachnotronic]

What is that updated Kryo bullshit. It's an A73 A53 SoC.

Website says 8x Kryo 280 cores; Kryo 280 is a customized version of some ARM CPU for Qualcomm.

Could you please provide a source for the A73/A53 claim? Thanks.

 

[dark zero]

Website says 8x Kryo 280 cores; Kryo 280 is a customized version of some ARM CPU for Qualcomm.

Could you please provide a source for the A73/A53 claim? Thanks.

https://www.qualcomm.com/products/snapdragon/processors/835

Hope this is true. At least Qualcomm says that all of them are Kryo 280 cores, and I am even doubtful about that...

That's because the leaked benchmark of the Xiaomi Mi 6...

Source: http://www.xiaomidevice.com/blog/xiaomi-mi6-has-crossed-the-200000-mark-on-an-antutu-benchmark/

And I compared to the Mi 5S benchmark

Source: http://www.gsmarena.com/xiaomi_mi_5s_spotted_on_antutu_with_a_score_of_164002-news-20645.php

CPU wise something goes wrong. That's the doubt of Qualcomm. Hope this changes in the next days.

 

[Lodix]

Website says 8x Kryo 280 cores; Kryo 280 is a customized version of some ARM CPU for Qualcomm.

Could you please provide a source for the A73/A53 claim? Thanks.

Well they are the latest cores available so it is just the common sense... And the clocks fit perfectly with the architecture and the process node they are using ( kirin 960 as reference ). They are both going for a very modest CPU TDP.

 

[Lodix]

https://www.qualcomm.com/products/snapdragon/processors/835

Hope this is true. At least Qualcomm says that all of them are Kryo 280 cores, and I am even doubtful about that...

That's because the leaked benchmark of the Xiaomi Mi 6...

Source: http://www.xiaomidevice.com/blog/xiaomi-mi6-has-crossed-the-200000-mark-on-an-antutu-benchmark/

And I compared to the Mi 5S benchmark

Source: http://www.gsmarena.com/xiaomi_mi_5s_spotted_on_antutu_with_a_score_of_164002-news-20645.php

CPU wise something goes wrong. That's the doubt of Qualcomm. Hope this changes in the next days.

This antutu result is fake because the GPU score is double of the normal SD820 when Qualcomm says "up to 25%" increase in graphics.

 

[Andrei.]

Website says 8x Kryo 280 cores; Kryo 280 is a customized version of some ARM CPU for Qualcomm.

Could you please provide a source for the A73/A53 claim? Thanks.

It barely differs from a stock A73 if it differs at all. The whole Kryo thing is just marketing and it's sad to see some sites actually believe it's a successor to the first core.

 

[dark zero]

This antutu result is fake because the GPU score is double of the normal SD820 when Qualcomm says "up to 25%" increase in graphics.

Errr.. the Mi5S uses Snapdragon 821...

 

[Lodix]

Errr.. the Mi5S uses Snapdragon 821...

And ? My statement was about the "leaked"/faked Antutu benchmark of the Xiaomi Mi 6. It is double of what the SD820/821 scores so it is unrealistic.

 

[ChronoReverse]

In the end it's better that it's A73/A53. It seems to me that SD820/821, while a lot better than SD810, isn't up to the competition.

 

[dark zero]

And ? My statement was about the "leaked"/faked Antutu benchmark of the Xiaomi Mi 6. It is double of what the SD820/821 scores so it is unrealistic.

Check the difference between SD 820 and 821... they are at 15% of difference due clock speeds!!!

So is not unrealistic at all.

 

[Lodix]

Check the difference between SD 820 and 821... they are at 15% of difference due clock speeds!!!

So is not unrealistic at all.

Yes, since when an up to 25% increase in performance becoming a 100% is realistic?

 

[antihelten]

It barely differs from a stock A73 if it differs at all. The whole Kryo thing is just marketing and it's sad to see some sites actually believe it's a successor to the first core.

You still haven't given him a source for your claims.

 

[grissom]

You still haven't given him a source for your claims.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/11045/the-anandtech-podcast-episode-40-ces-2017

From around 1:18:56 in the podcast. Edit: admittedly, the podcast doesn't say the Kryo thing "is just marketing", but I didn't come away from listening thinking there would be a huge performance difference from a stock A73/A53 arrangement.

 

[antihelten]

http://www.anandtech.com/show/11045/the-anandtech-podcast-episode-40-ces-2017

From around 1:18:56 in the podcast. Edit: admittedly, the podcast doesn't say the Kryo thing "is just marketing", but I didn't come away from listening thinking there would be a huge performance difference from a stock A73/A53 arrangement.

Andrei's claim wasn't that Kryo 280 wouldn't be any better than A73/A53 though, his claim was that Snapdragon 835 was literally an A73/A53 SoC and not a Kryo 280 SoC:

What is that updated Kryo bullshit. It's an A73 A53 SoC.

 

[Andrei.]

Andrei's claim wasn't that Kryo 280 wouldn't be any better than A73/A53 though, his claim was that Snapdragon 835 was literally an A73/A53 SoC and not a Kryo 280 SoC:

The original article states that Kryo 280 is a successor to the first Kryo, which is nonsense.

People need to go read what the Built on Cortex licence actually is. It's minor configuration changes that ARM offers to vendors that are implemented by ARM and then the vendor can go slap a custom name on it. Yes the Kryo 280 is likely technically different to an A73, but in no way that would be probably noticeable by anyone. Also in regards to the little A53 cores: we'll see if the CPUID has changed and if they have an license on those too but the excuse is anyway that the big cores are called Kryo 280 Gold and the small ones Kryo 280 Silver.

 

[antihelten]

The original article states that Kryo 280 is a successor to the first Kryo, which is nonsense.

People need to go read what the Built on Cortex licence actually is. It's minor configuration changes that ARM offers to vendors that are implemented by ARM and then the vendor can go slap a custom name on it. Yes the Kryo 280 is likely technically different to an A73, but in no way that would be probably noticeable by anyone. Also in regards to the little A53 cores: we'll see if the CPUID has changed and if they have an license on those too but the excuse is anyway that the big cores are called Kryo 280 Gold and the small ones Kryo 280 Silver.

Again a source for any of these claims would be nice. You seem to somehow know exactly how Kryo 280 looks architecturally (very close to A73), but so far you haven't backed it up with any sources that would actually support this.

It's not that I don't necessarily believe you, but without some sources to back up your claims, they are kinda hard to take serious.