Originally posted by: Stumps
Originally posted by: Eomer of Aldburg
Originally posted by: Stumps
Originally posted by: BFG10K
you do realise that the human eye can't see any more than 30 fps right? anything more isn't nessecary and is more of a placebo effect.
If you are already getting 30 frames per second or better, then the game is running smoothly.
This is totally false;
30 FPS is an absolutely slideshow in a FPS like Stalker.
you're an idiot.
I think not, Stalker seems very unresponsive at those framerates. Turn it to Static and the game runs how it should with firefights intense instead of Lag fights with Dynamic Lighting on.
Bullsh!t...I've been playing STALKER for over a month now at 1280x1024, FDL, Maximum Quality...I get a little higher than 30 fps Average frame rate and it runs nice and smooth with no stutter or lag even during large battles.
STALKER run perfectly fine at 30 fps...if your rig runs it like a slideshow then you aren't getting an average frame rate of 30 fps.
30fps
is a "slide show" relative to an
ideal minimum of 60fps when it comes to FPS games. I'm not even talking average, I'm talking
minimum. If you're averaging 30fps I say you're even more full of it, because then you're going to be hitting minimum frame rates below 30fps which is most definitely a slide show.
And I'd like to add in that I find it cute how people use descriptions such as "perfectly
fine", "playable", or "surprisingly smooth" - isn't it obvious by such choice of words that it isn't ideal? Perfect, silky smooth, more than playable -
enjoyable - if you're not willing to lie over the internet by using actual convincing descriptions, then you know guys like BFG10K and I are right on this (of course even if you did lie it would certify you as insane, so I guess the only saving grace here is that at least it is obvious you know the truth, you're just not willing to openly admit it)