Originally posted by: Thraxen
OMG, just about everyone here would be pissed it was their phone. But it's pointless to post something like this because everyone takes the "high road" and acts not only like they wouldn't be pissed, but also like it could never happen to them. They are all liars.
I don't understand where you're coming from. I have read plenty of cheap shots directed at the OP, but they generally focus on the fact that blaming Dunkin Donuts is the theme of the original post. The OP includes incorrect reasoning (re: the condition of the phone at the time of receiving the call) that has not been corrected -- on one hand, it's wrong; on the other, it justifies the anger at DD more.
Would I be upset if I misplaced my phone, resulting in it being damaged to the point of being barely usable? Yes, I would be furious if I had just spent $250 (V3i) plus several hours of my time hacking it, and I would be filled with rage if I believed that the damage was intentional. However, I think I would be barely calm enough to discuss (read: rant about) the events with my coworkers, who would likely point out the flaw in my reasoning.
Once I had calmed down, I would be grateful that my microSD card was fine and returned to me and/or that I hadn't had a chance to get a higher capacity one yet.
Originally posted by: Thraxen
In other words, you were directly responsible for the scratches whereas he thinks the employees may have done it. Huge difference. I'd be pissed too. I'm not saying he doesn't share the blame, but if things went down like he thinks they did [emphasis added] then just about anyone would be pissed.
I'll agree with you there, but they didn't. The flaw in the OP's reasoning has been pointed out, the phone was not necessarily undamaged at the time that the call was received.