There are lots of situations in winter driving, I would rather be out of control and stop sooner than in control and later. Just so happens I can't make an avoidance maneuver 'parked cars on one side steady traffic stream tother' and will rear end that car in front of me if I don't stop. I may fishtail a bit but I can feather the brakes to my own satisfaction.
ABS is for people who can't drive, I'd rather have the options
And as soon as you get a little sideways you're hitting traffic or a parked car, exacerbating your lack of control. You'd be much better off in a rear-end collision than bouncing around between parked cars and moving cars.
And if you REALLY think you're so good of a driver that you can handle that situation better than an ABS computer, you're an idiot. Leave adequate stopping distance between you and the next car and you don't have to decide between stopping distance and control.
Quoting from Chassis Handbook P182 as cited by Wiki, where most people blindly recite "ABS causes longer stopping distance":
The Limits of ABS
Special cases such as fresh snow or gravel, which tend to form a wedge in front of the locked up wheels that causes a braking effect, are exceptions that are of little relevance to everyday driving. In such cases, the improved steerability and dynamic stability provided by ABS are more important than the shortest possible stopping distance if the wheels were locked.
It's really misleading to say that ABS causes longer stopping distances when in reality, according to people who literally wrote the book on it, that statement has little bearing on real-world driving and the control offered from ABS is more important than the shortest stopping distance.