- Aug 22, 2003
- 42
- 0
- 0
Good first post.Originally posted by: porsche928
thats not gouging, its...deep mining
Originally posted by: BriGy86
perhaps you guys can answer my question and i wont have to start a new thread
what are the big difference between the FX and other chips like the X2
i know the X2 is a dual core but i've heard a few diff things about the FX (AMD's web site only talks about performance and what not with out any specs)
i've been told that the FX has more cache, and possibly a faster FSB, which makes the chip some what faster as a whole compared to others like the regualar AMD 64
but i was also told that it is an "unlocked" chip, so it is better for over clockers
are both of these things true?
if one were to buy and FX and not over clock would there be any benefit?
Originally posted by: Lonyo
Originally posted by: BriGy86
perhaps you guys can answer my question and i wont have to start a new thread
what are the big difference between the FX and other chips like the X2
i know the X2 is a dual core but i've heard a few diff things about the FX (AMD's web site only talks about performance and what not with out any specs)
i've been told that the FX has more cache, and possibly a faster FSB, which makes the chip some what faster as a whole compared to others like the regualar AMD 64
but i was also told that it is an "unlocked" chip, so it is better for over clockers
are both of these things true?
if one were to buy and FX and not over clock would there be any benefit?
FX60 is 2.6GHz dual core.
The fastest X2 is 2.4GHz dual core.
An FX60 would be slightly faster at stock than a 4800+ at stock.
FX60 has multipliers unlocked up and down (higher and lower mults), X2's just have lower mults.
Originally posted by: BriGy86
Originally posted by: Lonyo
Originally posted by: BriGy86
perhaps you guys can answer my question and i wont have to start a new thread
what are the big difference between the FX and other chips like the X2
i know the X2 is a dual core but i've heard a few diff things about the FX (AMD's web site only talks about performance and what not with out any specs)
i've been told that the FX has more cache, and possibly a faster FSB, which makes the chip some what faster as a whole compared to others like the regualar AMD 64
but i was also told that it is an "unlocked" chip, so it is better for over clockers
are both of these things true?
if one were to buy and FX and not over clock would there be any benefit?
FX60 is 2.6GHz dual core.
The fastest X2 is 2.4GHz dual core.
An FX60 would be slightly faster at stock than a 4800+ at stock.
FX60 has multipliers unlocked up and down (higher and lower mults), X2's just have lower mults.
what about cache and FSB? are they the same?
and the FX 60 would be better if you bought it stock and didn't overclock?
Originally posted by: Cooler
Originally posted by: BriGy86
Originally posted by: Lonyo
Originally posted by: BriGy86
perhaps you guys can answer my question and i wont have to start a new thread
what are the big difference between the FX and other chips like the X2
i know the X2 is a dual core but i've heard a few diff things about the FX (AMD's web site only talks about performance and what not with out any specs)
i've been told that the FX has more cache, and possibly a faster FSB, which makes the chip some what faster as a whole compared to others like the regualar AMD 64
but i was also told that it is an "unlocked" chip, so it is better for over clockers
are both of these things true?
if one were to buy and FX and not over clock would there be any benefit?
FX60 is 2.6GHz dual core.
The fastest X2 is 2.4GHz dual core.
An FX60 would be slightly faster at stock than a 4800+ at stock.
FX60 has multipliers unlocked up and down (higher and lower mults), X2's just have lower mults.
what about cache and FSB? are they the same?
and the FX 60 would be better if you bought it stock and didn't overclock?
AMD CPU's do not have a FSB
Originally posted by: professor1942
I just ordered six of them.
Originally posted by: BriGy86
they always say it's integrated into the chip, i assumed it was still there though
Originally posted by: Furen
Originally posted by: BriGy86
they always say it's integrated into the chip, i assumed it was still there though
The Frontside bus is the link from the CPU to the northbridge, while the Backside bus is the link from the CPU to the L2 cache. The Backside bus went away when L2 was integrated into the CPU die and the FSB went away when the northbridge was integrated into the CPU.
Before someone says "there's still northbridges on A64 motherboards" let me explain. The northbridge normally had (before the A64) three main parts: A memory controller, an AGP (video) tunnel, a system crossbar switch and any other arbitration logic that was needed. A64s integrated all of these onto the core except the video tunnel (and it sounds like they'll integrate it soon enough) so the equivalent of the FSB on these chips is the link between the execution core and the crossbar. So basically your FSB is running at 2.6GHz. Not that this matters since its not even close to a bottleneck.