I don't owe you redacted.So after 3, you'll give me an apology? Not that you don't owe me one already.
I don't owe you ####.
http://www.androidcentral.com/sprin...ram-note-7-buyers-concerns-over-safety-issues
Sprint is offering an exchange for the Note 7.
So, 5 people will exchange? Who the hell is on sprint anyway? No one I know uses sprint,http://www.androidcentral.com/sprin...ram-note-7-buyers-concerns-over-safety-issues
Sprint is offering an exchange for the Note 7.
Hell... other than the speakers (I'll never care about speakers on a phone as if there was any universe in which that would sound like anything worth listening to) if that existed, I'd own one.My current "dream" phone is a Nexus/Pixel phone with dual front facing speakers, edge display like the Note 7, and an S Pen equivalent. I will continue to keep dreaming.
Oh, look, Sprint's catering to your people, Chicken Little.
TMobile just jumped on board too.
Not sure what your problem is, it's news about the Note 7, if it was an iPhone, LG product, etc, I'd post about it too. I'm sorry you own one, if you feel it's such an important thing, why didn't you keep your 1st gen Note 7 to prove how brave you are?
The potential liability Samsung is looking at is massive. The reputation damage is already in process. I owned a Note 1,2,3, and 4, I'm a fan, I called it the best phone in the market, in this thread, until the 100 odd fires, and they haven't even begun to accumulate the daily physical insults cell phones accumulate while they're used for months and years. I wouldn't use a bent iPhone 6 or any bent or damaged phone because of the potential battery damage, not will I risk a 1st or 2nd gen Note 7.
This isn't a personal issue, it's a public safety issue.
Planes and cars crash every day. There was a fatal 3-car crash on 191 yesterday afternoon. Is the note 7 somehow to blame for that too?
You mean like your posts, which is why you think only they matter, I suppose?Once again, numbers don't matter, spectacular failures do.
You ignored my numbers from the last time I posted them, don't ignore them this time.
In two weeks following the launch of the first run of defective Note 7s, there were 100 total cases of overheating, and less then half of those resulted in a fire. Out of 2,500,000 phones.
It has been about two weeks since the availability of the second run non-defective devices, there has been exactly one alleged fire. Do you not think that if it were a problem, there would be more fires? Or maybe you're just blowing it far out of proportion.
I know which one I think is more likely (hint: it's the latter).
Edit: To answer your question about me trading mine in, I only did it because of all the incentives offered. I ended up with double accessories, a backup S-Pen, free case (from Best Buy), $25 credit on my account, and not having to deal with the popups on boot/charging. Plus, I even have another uSD card being shipped to me.
There are way way way more than two iPhone fires. There was a whole several months where the iPhone 4 was routinely catching fire in people's pants, in the EU.Regarding your numbers. That's 2.5 million phones shipped worldwide (not sold) including China which was supposed to be safe. In 2 weeks, that is like 14 to 20 charge cycles (if every phone was purchased day 1) and 100 caught on fire or exploded.
Iphone fire you linked (Iphone 6 and not 6s or 7 btw), that model has been out for roughly 2 years now and sold orders of magnitude more than 2.5 million units.
So you are comparing 100 plus fires (that we know about) out of a max possible of 2.5 million (being generous) over a course of 2 weeks vs 2 fires (that we know about) out of a possible 320 million (rough estimate) over a course of 2 years.
What was I just saying about people on a tech forum supposedly being smarter than this type of nonsense?Zaap and Raduque on suicide watch. Congratulations, y'all played yourselves. I don't know why you guys were so adamant about this since Samsung issued a recall. No one recalls a product that has low amounts of random failures.