This is what I think. Journalistic integrity is an issue but not just for gaming journalism you can find it more broadly in other niche areas as well journalism in general.
However, when an instance of questionable journalism became a lightning rod for people to rally around... a small group of those people carried it too far.
I wasn't paying attention to it much but I've heard that some accusations of sexism were thrown around.
When Fecility Day was doxxed that caught my attention.
She expressed her feelings of discomfort about some of the happenings related to #gamergate and why she was reluctant to talk about it.
Then soon after some dick-wad makes her fears a reality.
As I said journalism that covers gaming isn't the only place where one can find shady practices but if I were to start screaming about the mainstream media then also started calling female journalists or famous people covered by the mainstream media whores and sluts I've just entirely distracted from "ethics in journalism" as my cause.
s for objectification of female characters in video games. Let's not kid ourselves just because a person cannot name some examples off of the top of her head it doesn't gamers can't. Let's not kid ourselves.
For every Alyx Vance or Lara Croft there are a dozen female game characters or npcs who are examples objectification of the female form in video games.
Yes there is a problem in video game journalism. However, you've got a small group of people doing heinous things while saying "It's only about ethics in video game journalism"
Like it or not that small group of people have made it more than just "ethics in journalism"
It's a fucking mess now.
And while ethics in journalism is a broad issue for the profession, rather than just in this particular segment. Anyone who thinks we can have a discussion about it now without a cooling off period and an effort to stick to an issue without calling attention to someone's sexual attractiveness (or lack there of) is fooling themselves.
Having clarified my thoughts I'll take my own advice and "Up the Shut Fuck" about the subject.
....
Again, did you actually check the reality of the situation or did you get your information from arstechnica or some other corrupted source. They have been painting a false narrative for almost 3 months now. A small group of people didn't carry anything too far. The press exposed themselves for what they were in a single day with their "gamers are dead" reaction and their behavior has led to everything since. They've been dog piling the population they were supposed to be serving.
Felicia Day is just kind of the problem. She was doxxed by god knows who, could be someone on "her" side for all we know, we've seen they have no limits on what they will resort to. One person even tried making a threat on 8chan and then responding to themselves, not realizing that while on that site they are anonymous their, id would remain the same
All the prominent members of gamergate have been doxxed, and they aren't famous people who are able to deal with this kind of stuff. Milo Yiannopoulos was sent a syringe, KingOfPol sent a knife, and they swatted him as well. Others have had their work places called trying to get them fired even. Is never covered which says a lot about this situation.
Felicia Day took an incident and based on basically nothing reinforced prejudice. She said "The fact that it has affected me, to the point where I decided to cross the street last weekend away from those gamers, was heartbreaking"
Now just imagine if she had said this about black people. Someone somewhere, some "black guy" did some crime somewhere or hell, maybe one actually stole her car. Then would that justify prejudice against an entire race? And that's the thing, the left claims that they are hypersensitive to issues of prejudice, but clearly that isn't true as we've seen.
And really, what is Felicia Day known for? Her existence points to the fact that girls who fit the image of a certain "geek girl" are actually not that common. If every other supermodel was a COD player it guys wouldn't have to fantasize about Felicia Day as their waifu, it would be just a given that most girls play games regardless.
As for "objectification", that concept is the problem. Its just a tool for sex negative feminists to push their puritanical ideas on others through shaming language. The fact is many of the games which are dominated by female players don't include any women at all, the candy crushes of the world. If a Bayonetta is sexy, and its targeted towards men, that is perfectly legitimate. This demonetization of male interest is one of the worst things to come of feminism. And really, its a strange reality where women are condemning game characters that other women gladly choose to cosplay at conventions because they enjoy the attention. I guess that's "internalized misogyny" huh...
And anyways, this was all started by a woman who has no actual interest in video games.
This is her game idea after all.
Anita Sarkeesian's Game Idea: Good or Bad?
Asalieri2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRYv73OeoGI
No one is stopping women from making the content they desire. Zoe Quinn did this, and it was so bad she had to give it away. Brianna Wu's game barely qualifies as a game. While Kim Kardashian, a woman feminists barely can acknowledge as a woman made her own game instead of complaining, and it probably made her a pile of money in the process. If a man had come up with a game character which looked and acted like Kim, I'm sure feminists would be throwing around "misogyny" and "objectification" attacking the developer and that is the problem. If one is going to argue that an image dis-empowers women, you are going to have to explain how Kim Kardashain is proactive, while Anita Sarkeesian spreads the message of victimhood and plays the passive role of trying to force others through shaming to get them to create what she wants. She spreads the message of women as victims, women as liars, women as manipulators. And finally she spreads the message of women as people who attack others through the system using false accusations as she did with thunderf00t. Objectification isn't the problem, if there is a bad influence on women its people like Anita Sarkeesian who's only talent is to live off promoting a perpetual narrative of victimhood.
And seriously, it is kind of interesting why the concern is only about women protagonists. The men we mow down by the thousands? Not an issue. If you want true equality you should be demanding to shoot more women in the face like we do the men. Not a comfortable thing to ask for? Ask yourself why...
And if these questions need to continue. Rape is several times more common than murder, so if the question is about representation...inconvenient questions must be asked.
Anita Sarkeesian - Criticisms and Questions
noelplum99
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lgq_BO9JgH8