KMFJD
Lifer
- Aug 11, 2005
- 29,685
- 43,947
- 136
Comedy thread is comical
you better watch out, now you are going to be called a sjw or something
Comedy thread is comical
Comedy thread is comical
you better watch out, now you are going to be called a sjw or something
They can call me whatever they want however, it won't change the fact that grown "Men" are acting like little emo girls and it's so hilarious watching them show their whiny asses on a public forum.
I'm not arguing that women don't abuse as often (or nearly so) as men, I'm just saying that the effects are radically different. Talk to a cop. When a battered woman comes in to file charges, the immediate reaction is usually "My G-d, who did this to you?" When a battered man comes in to file charges, the immediate reaction is usually "Yes sir, how can we help you today?" I agree about the lesbian relationships being the most violent and that political correctness (as driven by progressives and radical feminists) tends to cover this up, but it's also worth pointing out that in sheer numbers these are very small. And a catfight (something many men love to see) is typically radically different in effect than a battering - although women are certainly becoming more violent and doing more serious damage, continuing beatings after one person is down with kicks and stomps which can more easily do serious harm than can punches.You're wrong about that. (Spot-on about a lot of your other stuff though.)
Statistics are beginning to reflect what's been the true story for a long time - when it comes to domestic violence, women are dishing it out AT LEAST as much as the men are. http://www.theguardian.com/society/2010/sep/05/men-victims-domestic-violence
I get to see this every damn day. Heh... lesbian relationships are the most violent ones out there! https://mainweb-v.musc.edu/vawprevention/lesbianrx/factsheet.shtml
As usual, the feminist-run sites being funded with public money falsely adjust the scales to paint the victim narrative and secure more for their organization.
The real world is so completely different from what feminists claim it to be, it's downright offensive in its falsehood.
Ran out of rational arguments, time to start up the image macros!
I'm not arguing that women don't abuse as often (or nearly so) as men, I'm just saying that the effects are radically different. Talk to a cop. When a battered woman comes in to file charges, the immediate reaction is usually "My G-d, who did this to you?" When a battered man comes in to file charges, the immediate reaction is usually "Yes sir, how can we help you today?"
I agree about the lesbian relationships being the most violent and that political correctness (as driven by progressives and radical feminists) tends to cover this up, but it's also worth pointing out that in sheer numbers these are very small. And a catfight (something many men love to see) is typically radically different in effect than a battering - although women are certainly becoming more violent and doing more serious damage, continuing beatings after one person is down with kicks and stomps which can more easily do serious harm than can punches.
My buddy was at a bar parking lot and a man came out followed by a very angry woman flailing away at him. He just hunched his shoulders and took it for about two-thirds of the way across the parking lot. Then he turned around and popped her one right in the mouth. Not hard enough to bust her lips, but hard enough to knock her on her ass. She was very, very surprised and quiet - although that may have also been because all the men and women in the parking lot applauded. I think you'd be surprised at how many women are perfectly fine with a man hitting back if a woman takes advantage of his reluctance to strike a woman, assuming of course that it is a measured response and not the same kind of violent attack appropriate for a man hitting him.More true than you know.
Don't underestimate the damage an enraged woman can do with her fists & nails, but given enough rage and not satisfied with how much "hurt" she's causing, the next step is an object; like the subway woman's shoe, pans, bottles, kitchen knives, hammers (surprisingly often), you name it. That's when the guy really gets messed up (and it's about the only time SHE will get in any trouble for her actions - though it'll still be 1/3 of the punishment a man would get for the same thing.
The "you're NEVER allowed to hit a woman" thing is being abused too much as women are now hitting men and laughing that he can't/won't hit back.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ca3PQ7gA8hg
My buddy was at a bar parking lot and a man came out followed by a very angry woman flailing away at him. He just hunched his shoulders and took it for about two-thirds of the way across the parking lot. Then he turned around and popped her one right in the mouth. Not hard enough to bust her lips, but hard enough to knock her on her ass. She was very, very surprised and quiet - although that may have also been because all the men and women in the parking lot applauded. I think you'd be surprised at how many women are perfectly fine with a man hitting back if a woman takes advantage of his reluctance to strike a woman, assuming of course that it is a measured response and not the same kind of violent attack appropriate for a man hitting him.
That is the goal of feminism. Men and emo girls as equals, in every way possible!
You should know these things, jeez.
Are you actually a filthy man-pig chauvinist in disguise?
Wow, I never knew the feminist were so powerful. They have the ability to turn real men into whiny emo girly boys. Personally I pay them no mind and go on with my life.
None the less this thread is pure comedy gold and I read it for the laughs it provides.
Emotional attack? Check.
Superiority claim? Check.
Still following the playbook to the letter. Well done!
They can call me whatever they want however, it won't change the fact that grown "Men" are acting like little emo girls and it's so hilarious watching them show their whiny asses on a public forum.
I agree, they are exactly what they claim to hate; whiny, petulant little bitches who think they are important and should be listened to.
Freedom of speech is a wonderful thing however, death threats and slander are not covered by the 1st amendment. Both can be quite costly to the person making or stating such.
Freedom of speech is a wonderful thing however, death threats and slander are not covered by the 1st amendment. Both can be quite costly to the person making or stating such.
People often confuse freedom of speech for freedom from consequences of speech.
This one is particularly disturbing. You're agreeing that feminists SHOULD have the right to have someone fired over a conversation with less than 100% agreement, and that the only proper solution is to NOT DISAGREE with them. Holy freakin' hell is that egotistical.If you know engaging someone may result in them trying to get you fired, why would you even entertain the idea of engaging them???