Doxxing is the favored tactic of sjw's and feminists. Their side is the ones who have been calling for doxing, from arthur chu to devin faraci, at some point or other they have condoned it. Anything to "protect the women" you know.
https://twitter.com/myloserville/status/521723751084597249/photo/1
https://twitter.com/devincf/status/523884023358423041
https://twitter.com/devincf/status/523734171857211392
But really, its more about the fact that their side doesn't actually have a legitimate argument to make. If they had to win based on merit alone, they would lose, so they always need someone to target directly for smearing. Its much harder to cry "misogyny" at an idea if your facts don't add up, but shouting "misogyny" at a person, that's how you shut people down. So doxxing is these peoples favored tactic, and we've seen it before in atheism plus/elevator gate.
Creepy Clowns: Freethought Bullies and the Threat Narrative Clown Horn
MykeruMedia
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_7SRa_xQNQ
As mykeru explains in that chilling video.
Doxing is a tactic to try to suppress speech through fear. Which side cares about free and open discussion? The atheists and gamergate do. Which side is constantly trying to bar people from having a say? Feminists and sjw's. Whether its Anita closing comments on youtube videos, even her colbert report video is closed to comments, or reddit, or any of the sites which have deleted countless threads and accounts for even daring to talk about this subject, their side is all about the suppression of speech. And what better way to suppress speech by targeting individuals and calling them misogynists. In fact they are targeting peoples twitter accounts as we speak since the "wam" womein in media or whatever rad fem group was allowed input on twitter moderation. First step out of the gate, mass bans on accounts.
http://dish.andrewsullivan.com/2014/11/10/the-sjws-now-get-to-police-speech-on-twitter/
http://dish.andrewsullivan.com/2014/11/11/the-sjws-now-get-to-police-speech-on-twitter-ctd/
WAM-Bam: No Thank You Ma'am
MykeruMedia
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3Dfrm55x14
Mykeru of course is one of the people hit, and still he is suspended because he isn't high profile enough to shame twitter into a quicker response. But they target him because they fear what he has to say.
https://twitter.com/lizzyf620/status/534042142080262145
@jordanowen42 @RogueStarGamez @Mykeru still suspended as well
The Gamergate story does have the merited meat that there are extremely abusive bullies and potential psychopaths out there in forums and other social media that have no moral qualms about entering absolutely socially unacceptable, let alone potentially illegal, verbal posturing into a dialogue all to threaten another into silent submission, or worse, present a violently forecasted warning that may leave a virtual realm.
The misogyny brings into another angle of resentment against women and a long assumed prejudicial place for their being.
That's a load of projection. By any standard we've seen professional adult people who are anti gamergate behave unimaginably worse than anything gamergate has been accused of.
"misogyny" has become a shield to abuse people, and to silence people. What this debacle has revealed is just how hipocritical these sjw types are, this new authoritarian left. They are literally worse than fox news at this point. They will lie, and then try to stop you from even being able to respond to them. Those are not progressive values anyone who is actually progressive will recognize. Why do they constantly shout about misogyny? Because they don't have an argument otherwise.
Again, these are a strange bunch of "misogynists"
Oliver Campbell stream #gamergate Threedog's news radio
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8SG7QuxqD4
Threedog's #Gamergate News Radio Ep 4 mp3 version!
http://www.mediafire.com/download/1zyjznam05qybuk/Threedog's+#Gamergate+News+Radio+Ep+4.mp3
All you need to know about Gamergate is that while they were purporting to be about ethics in gaming journalism, they attempted to get a website blacklisted from getting advanced copies of future games because they disagreed with a review score. A publisher only giving advance screening in exchange for favorable coverage is what most people would consider "wildly unethical." For Gamergate, "ethics" means "say what we want to hear or don't say anything at all." That's why their "ethics" complaints have almost exclusively focused on feminism. "I don't want to hear about it, therefore it's unethical to print it." It's a movement for people who have absolutely no idea what journalistic ethics means (as summed up nicely by people who actually study ethics
here and
here).
Wow dude, did you actually just link us to free thought blogs? They were corrupted by sjw's and feminists in the first round of this mess. Atheism plus aka Atheism + feminism which led to a witch hunt of "misogyny" within that community even leading to false allegations of sexual misconduct being leveled left and right. Free thought blogs like rational wiki are now really just oxymorons at this point. Sites like that, and articles like that are exactly the problem we're talking about. Ethics? They wouldn't know ethics if it hit them in the face.
https://thunderf00tdotorg.wordpress.com/tag/freethoughtblogs/
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQJW3WMsx1q1OkWXNYx0Oozq6fpNCvvKZ
https://www.youtube.com/user/MykeruMedia/videos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-eNn6S9hXA
A run down of one of the worst allegations of rape to hit atheism/skepticism conferences since atheism "plus" became a thing, and how it doesn't add up.