Tests were GPU bottlenecked plus we already stated FX would be fine for 1 GPU. When it comes to 2 or more is where it gets slaughtered
^ wrong...again.
You happily ignore what other people are writing and spread your FUD. Please stop.
1) No trolling, flaming or personally attacking members. Deftly attacking ideas and backing up arguments with facts is acceptable and encouraged. Attacking other members personally and purposefully causing trouble with no motive other than to upset the crowd is not allowed.
I'd like to point out that he is one of the biggest AMD zealots out there.Wow, the guy put so much effort in it for such useless results. Awesome.
Even with 1 GPU the FX can be quite a bit behind.
If you care to explain why im wrong ill take it in to consideration but i will not stop posting my opinion simple because you dont like it.
If you care to explain why im wrong ill take it in to consideration but i will not stop posting my opinion simple because you dont like it.
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=60552
If you care to explain why im wrong ill take it in to consideration but i will not stop posting my opinion simple because you dont like it.
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=60552
I wasn't aware that Moore's Law is being measurably beaten.Technology moves too fast these days. Cards are obsolete in a years time
i can't decide between the FX-4100. FX-6100, or FX-8120. any recommendations
Bulldozer is a good choice when no other choice is present. Simple as. Nobody is trying to mislead the crowd here.
You dont take anything going against bulldozer into consideration. All you do is keep chanting the same manipulated bulldozer nonsense over and over again. In a somewhat desperate hope you can trick more fools into buying that turd. Or simply because you try to get a certain response from it.
I would even consider you manipulation to the borderline of flamebaiting. Because I dont think you believe in your own nonsense either. And only other alternative would be economic motivation.
By this argument Burger King is a great dining option if there's nothing else around.Bulldozer is a good choice when no other choice is present. Simple as. Nobody is trying to mislead the crowd here.
While most games are GPU limited, some of the games that are CPU limited are very popular including SCII, WOW, BF3 MP, Skyrim, etc.I have shown you data from 9 DX-11 games that support what im saying. That most DX-11 games are GPU limited at 1080p. Not only that but i haven't concealed games where Intel CPUs are superior against AMDs CPUs like Civ V or F1 2011.
You on the other hand attack any AMD thread and people that present you with evidence of what they saying. You are blinded by the blue classes you wear and when someone challenges your perception you have on BD with hard data you believe he’s doing it for profit or to misinform others.
Learn to be objective, I have never said that BD is the best CPU but it can drive a high-end GPU like HD7970 in today’s DX-11 games. Yes there are games that Intel is faster, but saying that BD simple sucks for gaming is spreading FUD.
I have shown you data from 9 DX-11 games that support what im saying. That most DX-11 games are GPU limited at 1080p. Not only that but i haven't concealed games where Intel CPUs are superior against AMDs CPUs like Civ V or F1 2011.
You on the other hand attack any AMD thread and people that present you with evidence of what they saying. You are blinded by the blue classes you wear and when someone challenges your perception you have on BD with hard data you believe hes doing it for profit or to misinform others.
Learn to be objective, I have never said that BD is the best CPU but it can drive a high-end GPU like HD7970 in todays DX-11 games. Yes there are games that Intel is faster, but saying that BD simple sucks for gaming is spreading FUD.
If you can't afford anything better, then yes. If you don't want to pay more, then yes.By this argument Burger King is a great dining option if there's nothing else around.
If you can't afford anything better, then yes. If you don't want to pay more, then yes.
You decide. Nobody forces anybody of you to buy AMD processors. And it's been said thousand of times, they are not very good in games, not news. But, they're not total crap, as most of you make them look like. I know, it's very hard to refrain from using only binary logic but.. at least try.
Even if one accepts your contention that Bulldozer is "good enough" for gaming, the problem is that it is inferior to Intel and offers no other compelling advantages except in certain very limited, highly threaded applications. If Bulldozer were cheaper or used less power, an argument could be made for it. However, right now, at Microcenter, the FX8150 is actually 30.00 more expensive than the 2500K, and also uses more power.
You seem to be very determined to counter any argument in favor of Intel by citing the same data over an over again, and refusing to see any other side of the question, such as evaluating price/performance/watt instead of whether something is simply "good enough".
The point is for the same price as a BD build you can build a faster Intel build. At any price point.If you can't afford anything better, then yes. If you don't want to pay more, then yes.
You decide. Nobody forces anybody of you to buy AMD processors. And it's been said thousand of times, they are not very good in games, not news. But, they're not total crap, as most of you make them look like. I know, it's very hard to refrain from using only binary logic but.. at least try.
As such, we're almost-shockingly left without an AMD CPU to recommend at any price point.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/gaming-fx-pentium-apu-benchmark,3120-10.html
I wonder how AtenRa gonna crawl out of this one. Because instead of getting a FX8120, you are better of with a 68$ (newegg) G630. And we talk 1080p gaming here. But somehow I dont think he gonna recommend it. Because it aint an AMD CPU. Even tho it obviously is the better choice arcording to his own metrics.