Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: Boo Boo
I am guessing everyone has seen the sharp increase in prices over the last few years and it gets higher every year. but how can they charge so much and rake in the billions of profits while saying its the oil coming in.
they keep talking about reform but it seems that they only want to line their pockets with the profits the oil companies give back to them. I sure wish someone would get a pair of balls and do something.
profits of 12 billion a year are BS
Dave? Is this you?
BTW who has EVER talked about "reform"? What exactly needs reforming?
Oh and profits? How's this grab ya: (2006) (source: Fortune500)
WalMart (largest company on the planet): 11.2 bill
General Electric 16.4 bill
Citigroup: 24.6 bill
AIG: 10.3 bill
Bank of America: 16.5 bill
Microsoft: 12.3 bill
You wanna start a witchunt for them too? WTF are you bitching about?
I hate it when people purposefully distort information.........esp. when it's so easily checked. You conveniently left out that Exxon-Mobil is listed in the 2006 Fortune 500 list, either the American list or the Global list, as the #1 largest corporation on the planet........not Wal-Mart (#2 on both).
I think you are confusing profits and how they are being posted.........while it's true you posted the YEARLY profits for those companies mentioned above, in 2005....Exxon-Mobil was reporting QUARTLY profits about equal to WalMart's YEARLY profits.....
So, if you are really going to report profits for companies.....please compare yearly to yearly, not quarterly to yearly.....as you seem to be doing.
And actually, you misquoted the Fortune 500 list.............the largest company on the planet, according to profits, is Exxon-Mobil with yearly profits in 2006 of $36.1 billion......which is head and shoulders above Wal-Mart at #2, with profits of $11.2 billion.
So, it seems that Exxon-Mobil had, after taxes, $25 Billion MORE in profits than your beloved Wal-Mart.
Guess you can go here to see for yourself.....Fortune 500 list of 2006 annual ranking of America's largest corporations.....at least I put up a link to my figures.....
And of course, this comes off the AMERICAN Top 500 Fortune 500 list.......which does not include GLOBAL companies.
Here's a link to the Fortune 500 list of the World's largest corporations...........
Now, it's true that Wal-Mart still lists as the second largest corp. in the world, behind Exxon-Mobil........but WM's profits are nowhere near ANY of the top five oil company profits (and the last two are almost bit players in the oil biz).....which are:
Exxon-Mobil.........$36 Billion
Shell............$25 Billion
BP..........$22 Billion
Chevron...........$14 Billion
ConocoPhillips.......$13 Billion
The only non-oil company to show anywhere near those profits was Citigroup at $25 Billion for 2006......which puts them into very heady company. But that's the only company to get into that top three.....Conoco and Chevron are small players in the oil company arena.
The top three oil companies had higher profits than everyone on the Fortune 500 Global list except for the aforementioned Citigroup......they had higher profits than Toyota ($12 B), GE ($16B), Total ($15B), SHBC Holdings ($15B), BOA ($16B).
So, please compare apples to apples.
And I'll do the FAIR comparisons for you...........
Exxon-Mobil...........Revenues were $339B, profits $36B (Almost 11% profit margin)
Wal-Mart...............Revenues were $315B, profits $11.2B (Just over 3.5% profit margin)
Shell.....................Revenues $306B, profits $25.3B (Almost 9% profit margin)
BP........................Revenues $267.6B, profits $22.3B (Almost 9% profit margin)
Now, how did Exxon-Mobil have so large a profit margin on its revenues compared to Wal-Mart's, or how did Royal Dutch Shell have HIGHER profits than Wal-Mart despite lower overall revenues for 2006? ($9B lower revenues, $14B higher profits.)
So, to paraphrase what you said:
Oh, and profits? How's that grab ya??