Really amazing how Fury / Fury X performs rather
well in Medium settings, only to take a huge hit at Ultra. Might be a sign of what's to come with future titles - I'm surprised. Honestly this card looks like a poor choice right now when you can get RX 480/470 8GB for much lower prices and GTX 1070 for a few extra bucks.
You know, I'm pretty sure by now that you're trying to get this thread closed through flamebait posting.
The low minumums for all cards should be the first sign that they didn't test each run at native resolution, but everything on the same 4k screen which gives bugged results currently.
PCGH had no issues getting consistently high minimum readings after noticing that exact issue, even backed up with frametime graphs. But you referenced them, so surely you were aware of this.
The second, and more severe, warning sign should be that their benchmark scores don't align at all with Nvidias own benchmark scores. The 4k results are a lot higher (well, ok, aib cards) and the 1080p results are far too low, except for the 1060 which gets a very high result. And Nvidias performance guide sticks to a 4790 @ 4 GHz, PCLab uses a 6700k @ 4.7GHz so no CPU bottleneck at 1080p. Danger, Will Robinson, danger! PCGH again has no issues matching Nvidias results except for the 1060 which consistently underperforms in their benchmark run.