Geforce FX 99 Bux

[stncttr908]

Simply put, that card sucks hard. You'd be much better off going for a low end ATI card as of right now.

 

[galperi1]

Originally posted by: bluemax
*I* never linked anything, but you made a good point! The cards with 64-bit memory controller DO suck! Half the speed of the 5200 Non-Ultra is slower than an MX4-440. BUT he linked to the 128MB card which is supposed to be 128-bit. (Early reports suggest that 128-bit is *required* for 128MB cards which makes it the easiest way to make sure you get a card that performs quite decently.)

128-bit is NOT required as seen in the EVGA offering of the 5200

http://www.evga.com/articles/public.asp?AID=133&page=4

and notice how eerily similar the EVGA card is to the one he linked

 

[human2k]

Originally posted by: stncttr908
Simply put, that card sucks hard. You'd be much better off going for a low end ATI card as of right now.

Sapphire 8500LE OEM for $70 looks like the hot spot for ultra budget.

 

[Swanny]

Originally posted by: kevin000
That is strikingly familiar to my Voodoo 3 3000...

Exactly what I though!! But maybe a good card to replace that Voodoo 3?

 

[Auric]

Ralph Nader says the Geforce FX is unsafe at any speed.

 

[cliftonite]

Originally posted by: Auric
Ralph Nader says the Geforce FX is unsafe at any speed.

LOL

 

[Cheep]

Dude... I know I'm getting old when people around here are correcting the English on the "is suck" phrase...