No, try reading what I wrote.
If its a different chip, or a improved one with better silicon, and if they remove FP64 performance you find on Titan (because face it, this will most likely be a gamers card, not an jack of all trades like Titan), they can add more cores and even have the cores running faster than Titan. Meaning it will be quite a bit faster than +7% over Titan.
There is a reason why they skipped GPGPU on GK104 aka GTX 680.
Be assured that each of your sentences is scrutinized..
A point by point analysis :
If its a different chip, or a improved one with better silicon
Silicon is the same good ole 28nm from TSMC , dead mature
and unworthy of a re spin , better to focus on next gen and
fill the instant with the existing best die.
and if they remove FP64 performance you find on Titan
FP64 has no use in games , true , but it wont increase comsumption
in games even if it s enabled so there are no power savings by cutting
this functionality.
they can add more cores and even have the cores running faster than Titan. Meaning it will be quite a bit faster than +7% over Titan.
Max is 2880 , 7% more than in Titan and , for the reason above ,
unlikely to be used without a slight bump in thermals compared
to Titan if frequency is the same.