http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/StalkingStalking is unwanted or obsessive attention by an individual or group toward another person
You're the one attempting to make a point using bad information. Such as Shellie claiming he threatened her with a gun, when she was interviewed by the police there was no gun involved and not a single witness ever saw one.
Do I care if GZ is jail for domestic abuse ? Hell no.
Do I find it funny that people try to draw comparisons to this and the TM case just to relieve their asshurt from falling for misleading media stories in the TM case. Hell yes.
Following =/= stalking you moron. George and Trayvon never met before that night. As such there can be NO STALKING TERM APPLIED. Ever. Period. End of story.
When you can understand that tiny little detail of the law you may finally understand why the verdict was a not guilty for the case. If you can't understand that simple legal definition then all I can say is I'm sorry for your mental incapacity, maybe it's genetic on your part, but regardless it would make you a fucking idiot.
So as we surrepticiously lead the discussion away from Zimmerman's erratic behavior by his supporters, I ponder on the idea that if his head was as screwed up as he is now when he decided to initiate a course of action that eventually led to having him kill Trayvon (justifiably or not) methinks it would cast a pall on his ability to excersize sound judgement that fatal night. I wonder if his now evident mental instablility would have affected the outcome of the trial to his disfavor.
So if someone looks at me and I don't want to be looked at I am allowed to bash their head into the concrete?:awe:
Surprised no one has blamed the girl friend yet. We all know bitches be crazy right?
/sarcasm
$9k bond, no contact with victim, GPS monitoring and no guns while out on bond.
Can go to house with police to retrieve belongings.
Next court date Jan 7th.
Again, your the one using incorrect information in your attempt to justify this malcreant. Show me anywhere she said a gun wasn't involved. She said she didn't see a gun. Gz's attorney said GZ told him he had a gun. In fact Gz's ex who was at Shellie's house that day (the one who just called the police on him) in her police statement says that she and GZ both had guns while they were in the car. The police didn't search Gz's car. It is easy enough to have put it in the car. But I'm really tired of correcting you and your misinformation.
Please try and keep up.Do I care if GZ is jail for domestic abuse ? Hell no.
Do I find it funny that people try to draw comparisons to this and the TM case just to relieve their asshurt from falling for misleading media stories in the TM case. Hell yes.
$9k bond, no contact with victim, GPS monitoring and no guns while out on bond.
Can go to house with police to retrieve belongings.
Next court date Jan 7th.
No but let's say a woman breaks down and has to walk to safety in the dark. If she is being followed by a guy, she speeds up and he speeds up until he catches her if she has pepper spray she might use it.
Did you read the link you posted ?
I can stalk a deer even if we've never met. Stalking can mean lots of things but at it's simplest it's following, or paying some sort of attention to, someone that doesn't want to be followed or paid attention to.
There's more to the crime called stalking, but stalking is also a word that has meaning other than a crime.
Or maybe having his head bashed into the ground followed by an attempted race based lynching made him mentally unstable? :hmm:
And what "course of action" did he initiate the led to having to hill Trayvon? Lets say Zimmerman is in my neighborhood. He sees me walking in my deep-cover hoodie and assumes I am up to no good and follows me for a short distance and calls 911. Do I end up dead?
He'll get picked up for something between now and that court date. Too easy.
Hey spidey gonna write that check??
Now does that sound anything like what happened in the Trayvon case?:hmm:
Maybe you should roll over and ask him.
similarities are being followed in the dark by some strange guy, being paced in speed and then refusing to answer properly "why are you following me"
Lets be clear, her story changed between the call to police and when they interviewed her, no gun was ever involved, yet you consider that proof of what?
BTW Im not defending this miscreant. Im simply making fun of the people attempting to draw comparisons between two completely unrelated cases.
Please try and keep up.