- Nov 16, 2006
- 7,219
- 7,743
- 136
It doesn't increase engagement, it just gives people a way out of the conversation by pushing a button.
My ire really lies with downvoting.
When someone agrees with a post, everything you need to know about what they liked is right there in the body of the post. We really don't need a circlejerk of posts going "I agree" afterward either.
But when someone downvotes or "disagrees" with a post, its sort of the internet equivalent of rebuking an argument by saying "no" then walking away. What is the disagreement? Lets have a debate? Lets hash out ideas so we all reach a better understanding? No.
The information we need on understanding a downvote is the infinity of possibilities outside the body of the post. The post is the wrong answer, what is the right answer? No one knows, because the downvoter is not forced to put their counterargument out there.
This forum is dead enough, lets not give people more excuses not to post.
My ire really lies with downvoting.
When someone agrees with a post, everything you need to know about what they liked is right there in the body of the post. We really don't need a circlejerk of posts going "I agree" afterward either.
But when someone downvotes or "disagrees" with a post, its sort of the internet equivalent of rebuking an argument by saying "no" then walking away. What is the disagreement? Lets have a debate? Lets hash out ideas so we all reach a better understanding? No.
The information we need on understanding a downvote is the infinity of possibilities outside the body of the post. The post is the wrong answer, what is the right answer? No one knows, because the downvoter is not forced to put their counterargument out there.
This forum is dead enough, lets not give people more excuses not to post.