Gf4mx440 is just slightly slower than the geforce 3 ti200 and it is less expensive too.
oh, and I just wanted opinions about the gaming performance between these two cards. don't tell me to buy a radeon 8500 ...cos i'm not in america and they are very expensive here. and a ti4200 is too long for me to wait since I need a graphics card right now.
Will vertex shader or pixel shader for DirectX 8 support be such a big deal ? Only a tiny few new games in the future will use these and by that time the geforce 3 ti200 will be very much out of date anyway.
How much performance hit will the 440 get for those new games ? I'm assuming it would still be quite good (not talking full detail 1600x1024 here)
so for the gamer that only plays in 1024x768 ...will the gf4 mx440 be a good card ? especially when a Gainward gf4 mx440 golden sample can be overclocked to be faster than the ti 200 and when converted to US currency will cost me about US$60 less than a ti 200
Also won't future drivers make the gf4 mx faster than the gf3 ti 200 ?
oh, and I just wanted opinions about the gaming performance between these two cards. don't tell me to buy a radeon 8500 ...cos i'm not in america and they are very expensive here. and a ti4200 is too long for me to wait since I need a graphics card right now.
Will vertex shader or pixel shader for DirectX 8 support be such a big deal ? Only a tiny few new games in the future will use these and by that time the geforce 3 ti200 will be very much out of date anyway.
How much performance hit will the 440 get for those new games ? I'm assuming it would still be quite good (not talking full detail 1600x1024 here)
so for the gamer that only plays in 1024x768 ...will the gf4 mx440 be a good card ? especially when a Gainward gf4 mx440 golden sample can be overclocked to be faster than the ti 200 and when converted to US currency will cost me about US$60 less than a ti 200
Also won't future drivers make the gf4 mx faster than the gf3 ti 200 ?