- Apr 20, 2003
- 32,236
- 53
- 91
Originally posted by: Mookow
Look, I'll admit I'd own a Miata, if it was one of the project cars I've seen with a Chevy 350 or 346 dropped in. But I'd like that to be an LS7, please .
Originally posted by: Mookow
Look, I'll admit I'd own a Miata, if it was one of the project cars I've seen with a Chevy 350 or 346 dropped in. But I'd like that to be an LS7, please .
The motor is a supercharged 1993 Ford 5.0 w/ 30k mile on the short block prior to motor mods and installation. It made 389.2 SAE corrected RWHP on a Dynojet dyno running 6psi at 5200ft altitude. Using a 10% driveline loss number translates this into about 432 Crank HP.
Originally posted by: iloveme2
v8
The motor is a supercharged 1993 Ford 5.0 w/ 30k mile on the short block prior to motor mods and installation. It made 389.2 SAE corrected RWHP on a Dynojet dyno running 6psi at 5200ft altitude. Using a 10% driveline loss number translates this into about 432 Crank HP.
Originally posted by: Mookow
Originally posted by: iloveme2
v8
The motor is a supercharged 1993 Ford 5.0 w/ 30k mile on the short block prior to motor mods and installation. It made 389.2 SAE corrected RWHP on a Dynojet dyno running 6psi at 5200ft altitude. Using a 10% driveline loss number translates this into about 432 Crank HP.
Which is only slightly more than the LS2. The LS7 is to the LS2 what the LS6 is to the LS1. And considering the much better torque curve (not to mention higher HP) of the LS2 compared to the LS1, I have no doubt that an unboosted LS7 will pwn that all over the place. Boost the LS7... *drools*
Originally posted by: Rent
You're just mad that you look "cute" driving it.
Originally posted by: Rent
You're just mad that you look "cute" driving it.
Originally posted by: RagingBITCH
Originally posted by: Rent
You're just mad that you look "cute" driving it.
roflmaopmppwnbbq!!! :beer: pwn3d!