Give Trump a chance

[Sheik Yerbouti]

As I've already explained (but I'll do it again because I know you're a little slow), it's not angering the libs that is good. The libs getting angry is just a reaction to the good stuff being done. Thus the delight in the anger and hysteria by the libs.

define 'good stuff'

 

[repoman0]

define 'good stuff'

PokerGuy only deals in ethereal and undefinable perceptions, never absolutes or examples.

 

[MongGrel]

I'm here to help bring wisdom to you lib fools. That's a giant contribution right there

You should work more on the seeking wisdom end to begin with.

You really come off sounding like the kid that has learned short division trying to teach advanced calculus because he thinks he has all the answers now, to put it bluntly.

 

[Doc Savage Fan]

I would like to know what changes to the current screening process require change.
You are implying that people are not being properly vetted by the United States when we accept refugees

Last time I checked there's a review of our vetting practices that's currently underway and we'll likely have an answer to your question when the review is completed. Apparently you think current practices are fine regardless of concerns expressed by the FBI. I personally believe that these concerns should be evaluated and a review of the process is prudent. We disagree...it's as simple as that.

 

[MrPickins]

Nope...you have no empathy, you're dead as hell inside.

You like it? You want more?

You democrats are all deplorable scumbags and a giant shit stain on humanity.

^ Or is this better?

1. I'm not a democrat.
2. You know nothing about my capacity for empathy, but we've all witnessed yours (or the lack thereof)

 

[Blackjack200]

Last time I checked there's a review of our vetting practices that's currently underway and we'll likely have an answer to your question when the review is completed. Apparently you think current practices are fine regardless of concerns expressed by the FBI. I personally believe that these concerns should be evaluated and a review of the process is prudent. We disagree...it's as simple as that.

You're a coward.

 

[Doc Savage Fan]

1. I'm not a democrat.
2. You know nothing about my capacity for empathy, but we've all witnessed yours (or the lack thereof)

That's besides the point. You dehumanize me and you deserve that kind of low-IQ shit thrown back in your face two-fold. Maybe someday you'll get it....but please excuse me if I don't hold my breath waiting.

 

[Doc Savage Fan]

You're a coward.

If you say so cupcake.

 

[MongGrel]

If you say so cupcake.

Watch out dude, he called you a cupcake.

He means business

 

[imported_tajmahal]

define 'good stuff'

Excellent choices in the President's cabinet for one. His Executive Orders for two. His choice of Supreme Court nominee for three.

 

[MrPickins]

That's besides the point. You dehumanize me and you deserve that kind of low-IQ shit thrown back in your face two-fold. Maybe someday you'll get it....but please excuse me if I don't hold my breath waiting.

Lest we forget, you were the one who asked me if I lacked empathy because I was dead inside.

Believe me, though I get it, and I get you (I've been here a looong time).

As far as dehumanizing you, I'm simply making observations based on your post history.

 

[Blackjack200]

Watch out dude, he called you a cupcake.

He means business

He's pathetic. He's either so terrified of a group that has essentially never committed terrorism and is already thoroughly checked before being allowed into the country that he's willing to break up families and ruin lives for the comfort of his lizard brain, or he's afraid to tell us the real reason he supports the ban

Spoiler

racism

Either way he's a worthless shit wad. Can't wait for him to post pictures of dead people again to try to feel a little less worthless.

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

Excellent choices in the President's cabinet for one. His Executive Orders for two. His choice of Supreme Court nominee for three.

I believe that the majority of the population would soundly disagree with you, and hopefully WE will make our voices heard, loudly and clearly.
But if you think devos was a valid choice for ed secretary, you're pretty fucking hopeless anyway.

 

[MongGrel]

Excellent choices in the President's cabinet for one. His Executive Orders for two. His choice of Supreme Court nominee for three.

KK

I do not care if it is cliched or not.

 

[Vic]

I've been trying to give Trump a chance, but he's been using shock and entertainment to hide his corruption, weakness, and incompetence. And while a large number of the American people are falling for it, business is getting increasingly worried, and warning bells are being sounded.
My expectation is that without some form of change in direction, we could be looking at a major market correction by the end of the year, and a recession by next year.

 

[imported_tajmahal]

I believe that the majority of the population would soundly disagree with you, and hopefully WE will make our voices heard, loudly and clearly.
But if you think devos was a valid choice for ed secretary, you're pretty fucking hopeless anyway.

As if you have a valid reason to deny President Trump his choice for a Secretary of Education except the pap that was spoon fed to you by the media. You're a brainless puppet that has never made a decision of your own for anything.

 

[Vic]

There's already another thread on that one He's doing lots of good stuff, much better than I could have anticipated.

Lots of good stuff... like badmouthing federal judges, threatening major US employers and our biggest trading partners and allies, and appointing cabinet members who either incompetent, corrupt, or both. All the while using the office of the Presidency to pump his own brand and products.
Yep, lots of good stuff..

 

[Doc Savage Fan]

Lest we forget, you were the one who asked me if I lacked empathy because I was dead inside.

Believe me, though I get it, and I get you (I've been here a looong time).

As far as dehumanizing you, I'm simply making observations based on your post history.

Review the thread postings regarding regarding lack of empathy and being dead inside (I believe I was responding initially to Blackjack before you chimed in). Now read it again because you're looking a little dense here. Then let me know if I need to explain it to you.

However, from your post above I see that you've now arrived to a place where you actually feel justified in dehumanizing me...wow, just wow. I would love to have a beer with you someday to understand the intellectual and emotional gyrations it takes for someone to rationalize such a horrific perspective of another human being and to know exactly what I did that merits this kind of demonization. Don't worry, I'll buy.

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

As if you have a valid reason to deny President Trump his choice for a Secretary of Education except the pap that was spoon fed to you by the media. You're a brainless puppet that has never made a decision of your own for anything.

LOL
Ok tajjy, other than her donating millions to gop campaigns, what exactly are her qualifications to head the public education system.
same for rick perry and the dept of.. of... oops.
same for pruitt and his hatred of the epa.

The media didn't spoon feed me anything. I seek out information on my own, verify it and then proceed with my own decisions. And ffs tajjy, drumpf has contradicted himself on numerous occasions, sometimes in less than an hour.
Seek help troll-boy

 

[MrPickins]

Review the thread postings regarding regarding lack of empathy and being dead inside (I believe I was responding initially to Blackjack before you chimed in). Now read it again because you're looking a little dense here. Then let me know if I need to explain it to you.

Yeah, no. I objected to your post, and you replied to me with:

It's called reality. Where's you're fucking empathy? Are you fucking dead inside?

However, from your post above I see that you've now arrived to a place where you actually feel justified in dehumanizing me...wow, just wow. I would love to have a beer with you someday to understand the intellectual and emotional gyrations it takes for someone to rationalize such a horrific perspective of another human being and know what happened that merits this kind of demonization. Don't worry, I'll buy.

Then you misread my post. I'm not attempting to dehumanize you. I'm simply stating that you clearly have no empathy for the dead in the picture (based on my observation of your post history). You don't post it because you truly care, you post it to score cheap points and to divert from the issues being discussed. Spare us all your crocodile tears.

 

[MongGrel]

Review the thread postings regarding regarding lack of empathy and being dead inside (I believe I was responding initially to Blackjack before you chimed in). Now read it again because you're looking a little dense here. Then let me know if I need to explain it to you.

However, from your post above I see that you've now arrived to a place where you actually feel justified in dehumanizing me...wow, just wow. I would love to have a beer with you someday to understand the intellectual and emotional gyrations it takes for someone to rationalize such a horrific perspective of another human being and to know exactly what I did that merits this kind of demonization. Don't worry, I'll buy.

You have displayed a complete lack of empathy for years.

You never did answer me when I asked you list a single thing you have done to advance humanity.

 

[Doc Savage Fan]

Lots of good stuff... like badmouthing federal judges, threatening major US employers and our biggest trading partners and allies, and appointing cabinet members who either incompetent, corrupt, or both. All the while using the office of the Presidency to pump his own brand and products.
Yep, lots of good stuff..

So which is worse in your opinion...calling a judge a "so-called" judge on twitter or publicly berating the entire Supreme Court during a State of the Union address for their United Citizens ruling?

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/29/us/politics/29scotus.html

 

[agent00f]

Yeah... Because that's what he is doing....

Anyone with any sense should have seen this coming.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/07/opinions/reasoning-with-trump-voters-mallicote/index.html

How to reason with a Trump voter
And all in 3 weeks.

No. They knew it was coming and they supported it because it's what they wanted. Putting lower status group in their place, handouts to themselves at any cost, etc. Literally everything american conservatism has a reputation for. That's why they're pre-empting the repercussions with excuses. "We know he's going to be a disaster but a) let's keep going anyway, and b) it's really the libtards fault in any case".

Trump is unarguably a pure expression of their ideology, so there's no reason to believe it's somehow an error in judgement.

 

[Desturel]

I think the travel ban illustrated it nicely. Remember the picture of that Iranian infant that needed heart surgery? The one that melted your heart, even if someone shouldn't need to be cute to be treated humanely? I saw Trumpsters look at that picture and brush it off.

When I mentioned the fact that a 5 year old was handcuffed and detained at an airport, he replied "have you seen the movie 'American Sniper'? Five yearolds can old guns to"

I nearly screamed at him that the kid is an American citizen who lawfully entered the United States and how would he feel if his grandson (who is 4 BTW) was handcuffed in an airport. He looked at me as if he couldn't understand what I was saying. I mean, of course his grandchild wouldn't be handcuffed, because his grandchild is white. He couldn't and wouldn't draw the parallel.

 

[Vic]

So which is worse in your opinion...calling a judge a "so-called" judge on twitter or publicly berating the entire Supreme Court during a State of the Union address for their United Citizens ruling?

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/29/us/politics/29scotus.html

Which is worse is an irrelevant argument. Two wrongs don't make a right. In fact, one of the most troubling things these days IMO is that that seems to be the only argument that Republicans have any more. You'll desperately search for some false equivalence (I've never defended Obama for that), and then use it as a phony excuse to cry hypocrisy, when it's really just an excuse for partisanship. It's transparent and it's childish. And the more people see that our entire country is being run by people who think like that, the more worried and the less confident they're going to become.