GM's Lutz: Don't Cut My Salary!

Analog

Lifer
Jan 7, 2002
12,755
3
0
DETROIT -- General Motors Corp. -- contrary to suggestions by Kirk Kerkorian aide Jerry York -- is moving as swiftly as it can to turn around its ailing auto business and does not need to slash executive salaries or ax brands, a top GM executive said Wednesday.

"I have to say I gave at the office," GM Vice Chairman and product chief Bob Lutz said, referring to what he estimates is a 60 percent drop in his salary after company losses forced him to forgo a bonus and rendered his stock options worthless.

Lutz asserted that cutting executive pay could trigger a talent drain at a time when the automaker needs to marshal all of its resources.

"Here's where people get this wrong: They say, 'Why are executives paid so much? You have to ask: Why are professional athletes paid so much?' "

"The capability of successfully trying to turn around an unsuccessful automobile company is a very rare and highly sought after skill set. And you do the shareholder no good whatsoever by reducing compensation to the point where everybody leaves."

Lutz spoke to The Detroit News while on a tour of the North American International Auto Show on Wednesday with GM's board of directors, including GM Chairman and CEO Rick Wagoner.

York, an adviser to GM shareholder Kerkorian, called on GM on Tuesday to speed its turnaround by cutting executive and director pay, killing the Hummer and Saab brands, reducing its quarterly dividend and expanding other cost cuts.

"We're always happy to listen to suggestions, but we think we have the right plan to turn it around," Lutz said.

GM has frozen the salaries of top executives the last two years and bonuses have been cut to reflect the automaker's falling profits.

In 2004, Wagoner's compensation package included a $2.2 million salary -- the same as 2003 -- a $2.5 million bonus and 400,000 stock options valued at the time at $5.1 million. In 2003, he received a $2.9 million bonus and 500,000 stock options.

Lutz and John Devine, GM's former chief financial officer, received cash compensation totaling $4.4 million and $4.2 million, respectively, for 2004. In 2003, they each received about $6.4 million. The cash compensation included base salaries of $1.55 million each in 2003 and 2004, plus bonuses. York also called for GM to lower the pay of its outside directors, which receive $200,000 a year, with $140,000 deferred in restricted common stock units.

The automaker is planning job cuts and plant closings to reverse North American losses that reached $4.8 billion in the first nine months of 2005.http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060112/AUTO01/601120365
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,131
5,659
126
Usually Corporations pay good money to attract Talent, but one wonders how much "talent" exists at the largest Automotive Corporation in the World when it's on its' deathbed? At least start Firing some of the bastards.
 

Hubris

Platinum Member
Jul 14, 2001
2,749
0
0
Feh. Athelete's are paid as much as they are because they bring in much more revenue. If you're a star player, people will buy your merchandise and come to see you play, which translates into money for the front office. Athletes are only paid as much as they are because the market supports it. It's not like owners are doing it out of the goodness of their hearts.

As for execs, he's got a point; you don't want to bring in second-stringers when you're trying to save your company. And you can't attract top talent if you're not spending top cash. Unfortunate but true.
 

Shadowknight

Diamond Member
May 4, 2001
3,959
3
81
Considering how badly the company's been doing, I don't think the executives can justify how much they are earning; if they were that good, the company wouldn't be in that much danger, if any, in the first place.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
66
91
I could see Lutz's point, if he had in fact been successful in turning GM around. Since he hasn't, I can't really respect his take on his own inflated salary.
 

Budmantom

Lifer
Aug 17, 2002
13,103
1
81
Originally posted by: DonVito
I could see Lutz's point, if he had in fact been successful in turning GM around. Since he hasn't, I can't really respect his take on his own inflated salary.

Agreed, let the results speak for themselves.

How can he keep on getting a bonus if they are losing money?


Tom

 

SagaLore

Elite Member
Dec 18, 2001
24,037
21
81
Last semester I took a managerial decision making class, and one of our case studies was GM.

Wow do they suck at making decisions.
 

MikeMike

Lifer
Feb 6, 2000
45,885
66
91
Originally posted by: Budmantom
Originally posted by: DonVito
I could see Lutz's point, if he had in fact been successful in turning GM around. Since he hasn't, I can't really respect his take on his own inflated salary.

Agreed, let the results speak for themselves.

How can he keep on getting a bonus if they are losing money?


Tom

he has been in for 5 years iirc...

do you really think you can turn around a company the size of GM in 4 years, when it takes 3-5 years to introduce a concept, and then produce it to the masses? (note, i put in the concept part, which the Solstice was before it was ever named for production)

Wagoner is the one who should be fired, Lutz has done nothing but good for GM nad has a great outlook for them. The cars will be great, just it cant be done in the time. Lutz however has made slow but steady progress. just look at the Enclave for this.
 

Vette73

Lifer
Jul 5, 2000
21,503
8
0
Originally posted by: Budmantom
Originally posted by: DonVito
I could see Lutz's point, if he had in fact been successful in turning GM around. Since he hasn't, I can't really respect his take on his own inflated salary.

Agreed, let the results speak for themselves.

How can he keep on getting a bonus if they are losing money?


Tom


Yep!!!

And a baseball, football, etc.. player is only paid for how good they are. If they suck take a guess what, they don;t get their bonus and then they might even get cut if they are not good.

For GM to blame the people that build the cars as their problem is like Tom Brady saying he had a bad game because the Hot dog vendor was over paid and not doing his job well.

If the Exe's want to leave let them. New blood can;t do any worse then what the over paid people there have been doing. Mind you I think Lutz has done good work. But I think he is just trying to cover for his boss's and the other slugs that need to be cut.
 

MikeMike

Lifer
Feb 6, 2000
45,885
66
91
Originally posted by: SagaLore
Last semester I took a managerial decision making class, and one of our case studies was GM.

Wow do they suck at making decisions.


yea, its just a huge company that has way to many steps to determine production or not, and the financial advisors have a lot of input.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,266
126
I think the whole executive model is flawed.

Take a few people in the organization. People who actually see what happens on the floor, who handle the money, who see public wants, and give them executive power. These people are more in touch with the real world and can find a way to work together especially if their bonus is tied to success, as is not the case now.
 

dug777

Lifer
Oct 13, 2004
24,778
4
0
Originally posted by: Hayabusa Rider
I think the whole executive model is flawed.

Take a few people in the organization. People who actually see what happens on the floor, who handle the money, who see public wants, and give them executive power. These people are more in touch with the real world and can find a way to work together especially if their bonus is tied to success, as is not the case now.

It's all very well in theory, but how do you propose to implement that? As i understand it currently most exec's bonuses are tied to performance, look what has happened to Lutz's salary/bonus package...
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,266
126
Originally posted by: dug777
Originally posted by: Hayabusa Rider
I think the whole executive model is flawed.

Take a few people in the organization. People who actually see what happens on the floor, who handle the money, who see public wants, and give them executive power. These people are more in touch with the real world and can find a way to work together especially if their bonus is tied to success, as is not the case now.

It's all very well in theory, but how do you propose to implement that? As i understand it currently most exec's bonuses are tied to performance, look what has happened to Lutz's salary/bonus package...


Stock holders can do it if they wish, and very often a bonus is a gift.

A few years back Coke was having some troubles and the shareholders were hopping mad. So the execs said they would base compensation (bonus) on performance. They set standards, and everything is understood, right?

Well.... what happened is that those standards were not nearly going to be met, so the execs rewrote the goals. Like magic they were "entitled" to it.

The system is "scratch my back and I'll do yours". Top execs continually find ways to keep themselves paid well no matter, and if they get the boot, that famous "golden parachute" kicks in.

Consider it like a highly paid union for themselves.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |