Seems like Im the only one around here who's got an active interest in Gnome/KDE, but Im gonna post my initial impressions of Gnome 2.2 anyway
Installed it on my Gentoo box two days ago, been using it since.
It's improved a bit, enough to make me like it above KDE 3.1 so far.
Font handling is nicer, works pretty much the same way as in Redhat 8.0, which is a good thing, I don't enjoy having to mess around too much with simple boring things like fonts.
AA is nicer as well, the Gnome terminal uses the same AA settings as the rest of the system now, which is nice, I always liked the AA settings in the default RH terminal, that's now the default in Gnome, good thing
Also, changing the menu's is easier(well smoother), right click in the menu's and do whatever you wanna do(change, add, etc), that's another thing I don't like about alot of WM's/DM's, having to edit text files to change the menu's isn't hard, but it isn't my idea of fun either.
Of course for someone who uses a rather static set of programs that ain't much of a problem, but I just love trying out new stuff and install lots of programs, so my menu's change very often, which makes this a big improvement to me.
Those are the two big things for me so far, there's a bunch of small improvement here and there, as can be expected with a 2.0->2.2 release, which in the end makes 2.2 a nice improvement over 2.0, if nothing revolutionary.
I've seen a bunch of people complaining about problems with 2.2, however I've run into none so I have no comments on those.
All in all, a very worthwhile upgrade IMO
Oh, one more thing, it's a shame more applications haven't been ported to GTK2 yet, two of my most frequently used apps are still GTK+/1.4, Evolution and Galeon.
Im not much into using CVS snapshots, unless I really really have to.
The KDE project is far better in this respect, of course this is mostly due to the fact that all the major KDE apps fall under the KDE project umbrella, but still...
Installed it on my Gentoo box two days ago, been using it since.
It's improved a bit, enough to make me like it above KDE 3.1 so far.
Font handling is nicer, works pretty much the same way as in Redhat 8.0, which is a good thing, I don't enjoy having to mess around too much with simple boring things like fonts.
AA is nicer as well, the Gnome terminal uses the same AA settings as the rest of the system now, which is nice, I always liked the AA settings in the default RH terminal, that's now the default in Gnome, good thing
Also, changing the menu's is easier(well smoother), right click in the menu's and do whatever you wanna do(change, add, etc), that's another thing I don't like about alot of WM's/DM's, having to edit text files to change the menu's isn't hard, but it isn't my idea of fun either.
Of course for someone who uses a rather static set of programs that ain't much of a problem, but I just love trying out new stuff and install lots of programs, so my menu's change very often, which makes this a big improvement to me.
Those are the two big things for me so far, there's a bunch of small improvement here and there, as can be expected with a 2.0->2.2 release, which in the end makes 2.2 a nice improvement over 2.0, if nothing revolutionary.
I've seen a bunch of people complaining about problems with 2.2, however I've run into none so I have no comments on those.
All in all, a very worthwhile upgrade IMO
Oh, one more thing, it's a shame more applications haven't been ported to GTK2 yet, two of my most frequently used apps are still GTK+/1.4, Evolution and Galeon.
Im not much into using CVS snapshots, unless I really really have to.
The KDE project is far better in this respect, of course this is mostly due to the fact that all the major KDE apps fall under the KDE project umbrella, but still...