- Apr 20, 2002
- 72
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: BingBongWongFooey
Kahakai is only visually minimalist. It uses more ram than pretty much any other "lightweight" wm, has more dependencies, etc..
Originally posted by: Sunner
Originally posted by: BingBongWongFooey
Kahakai is only visually minimalist. It uses more ram than pretty much any other "lightweight" wm, has more dependencies, etc..
Heh, haven't used it much, only for ~30 minutes or so, looked like a suped up Fluxbox to me, so I assumed it was similarly lightweight.
Well, we all know what they say about assuming stuff.
Originally posted by: Haden
It's not fair to compare KDE with Kahakai/BlackBox, KDE vs GNOME is more like QT vs GTK. I could use blackbox on my main rig,
but that would take nearly same amount of mem. when all libs are loaded (yes, KDE does start a lot slower, but then kde apps start faster).
Actually, slow starting apps will see the end of me Hopefully KDE 3.2 has workaround for konqueror (works perfectly) and QT 4.0 is said to improve situation by 400% or smth.
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
LMAO at the poll results..