Originally posted by: Nik
If he COULD be updated, that means he CAN'T be God.
Originally posted by: Nik
If he COULD be updated, that means he CAN'T be God.
Originally posted by: Nik
If he COULD be updated, that means he CAN'T be God.
Originally posted by: Nik
If he COULD be updated, that means he CAN'T be God.
Originally posted by: Shawn
Originally posted by: Nik
If he COULD be updated, that means he CAN'T be God.
So does that mean God could make something heavy enough they not even he could lift?
Originally posted by: IonYou
Originally posted by: Nik
If he COULD be updated, that means he CAN'T be God.
Why the hell not? Like you have the definitive knowledge of what god is?
Originally posted by: Shawn
Originally posted by: Nik
If he COULD be updated, that means he CAN'T be God.
So does that mean God could make something heavy enough they not even he could lift?
Originally posted by: IonYou
Originally posted by: Nik
If he COULD be updated, that means he CAN'T be God.
Why the hell not? Like you have the definitive knowledge of what god is?
Originally posted by: DAGTA
Originally posted by: Shawn
Originally posted by: Nik
If he COULD be updated, that means he CAN'T be God.
So does that mean God could make something heavy enough they not even he could lift?
Yes, if he chose to. And if he then chose to lift it, he could.
God is beyond our limited four dimensional understanding.
For a much better discussion of this idea check out Mere Christianity by C.S. Lewis.
Originally posted by: everman
That's kind of like saying infinity +1
You can't make omnipotent "more omnipotent" can you?
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: DAGTA
Originally posted by: Shawn
Originally posted by: Nik
If he COULD be updated, that means he CAN'T be God.
So does that mean God could make something heavy enough they not even he could lift?
Yes, if he chose to. And if he then chose to lift it, he could.
God is beyond our limited four dimensional understanding.
For a much better discussion of this idea check out Mere Christianity by C.S. Lewis.
There's a difference between "cannot" and "chooses not to." The question suggests that God can create something that, when he chooses to attempt to lift it, the action of lifting the object is not something that God can accomplish.
Originally posted by: DAGTA
Originally posted by: Shawn
Originally posted by: Nik
If he COULD be updated, that means he CAN'T be God.
So does that mean God could make something heavy enough they not even he could lift?
Yes, if he chose to. And if he then chose to lift it, he could.
God is beyond our limited four dimensional understanding.
For a much better discussion of this idea check out Mere Christianity by C.S. Lewis.
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: DAGTA
Originally posted by: Shawn
Originally posted by: Nik
If he COULD be updated, that means he CAN'T be God.
So does that mean God could make something heavy enough they not even he could lift?
Yes, if he chose to. And if he then chose to lift it, he could.
God is beyond our limited four dimensional understanding.
For a much better discussion of this idea check out Mere Christianity by C.S. Lewis.
There's a difference between "cannot" and "chooses not to." The question suggests that God can create something that, when he chooses to attempt to lift it, the action of lifting the object is not something that God can accomplish.
Originally posted by: everman
That's kind of like saying infinity +1
You can't make omnipotent "more omnipotent" can you?
Originally posted by: DAGTA
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: DAGTA
Originally posted by: Shawn
Originally posted by: Nik
If he COULD be updated, that means he CAN'T be God.
So does that mean God could make something heavy enough they not even he could lift?
Yes, if he chose to. And if he then chose to lift it, he could.
God is beyond our limited four dimensional understanding.
For a much better discussion of this idea check out Mere Christianity by C.S. Lewis.
There's a difference between "cannot" and "chooses not to." The question suggests that God can create something that, when he chooses to attempt to lift it, the action of lifting the object is not something that God can accomplish.
You are thinking in linear time.
What I wrote makes more sense if you conceptualize that God exists in all time simultaneously.
Originally posted by: everman
That's kind of like saying infinity +1
You can't make omnipotent "more omnipotent" can you?
Originally posted by: deftron
Originally posted by: everman
That's kind of like saying infinity +1
You can't make omnipotent "more omnipotent" can you?
If you're "God", you should be able to.
Those are man's definitions
Originally posted by: deftron
Do you think God does upgrades on himself, since
he's like, God, and stuff ?
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: deftron
Originally posted by: everman
That's kind of like saying infinity +1
You can't make omnipotent "more omnipotent" can you?
If you're "God", you should be able to.
Those are man's definitions
So you are saying that an absolute of any idea is a man-made idea and does not actually exist? There are no absolutes in God's world?
Originally posted by: deftron
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: deftron
Originally posted by: everman
That's kind of like saying infinity +1
You can't make omnipotent "more omnipotent" can you?
If you're "God", you should be able to.
Those are man's definitions
So you are saying that an absolute of any idea is a man-made idea and does not actually exist? There are no absolutes in God's world?
Only God knows the answer to that question
Originally posted by: Nik
It's Terrorist Hunting Season and my permit number is 091101.