God dang I love Alabama

[dmcowen674]

Originally posted by: Mill
Topic Title: God dang I love Alabama
Topic Summary: Man caught fvcking his sister -- only in 'Bama

How lovely!

Dang Red State

Yes, it's sick and there should be no children from such activity (because of a Genetic Scientific reason Red Staters and the Religious don't believe in) but should the consenting adults be arrested and Jailed for 10 years???

I believe it is still a crime for Oral Sex in Bama too.

There should be a Government Official posted in every bedroom and lock up every Baman that violates the Law.

Better start building a lot more prisons down there.

On the plus side people in prison cannot vote so that will add more Blue Northern State votes to the kitty next Election cycles :thumbsup:

 

[QuitBanningMe]

Originally posted by: dmcowen674

Originally posted by: Mill
Topic Title: God dang I love Alabama
Topic Summary: Man caught fvcking his sister -- only in 'Bama

How lovely!

Dang Red State

Yes, it's sick and there should be no children from such activity (because of a Genetic Scientific reason Red Staters and the Religious don't believe in) but should the consenting adults be arrested and Jailed for 10 years???

I believe it is still a crime for Oral Sex in Bama too.

There should be a Government Official posted in every bedroom and lock up every Baman that violates the Law.

Better start building a lot more prisons down there.

On the plus side people in prison cannot vote so that will add more Blue Northern State votes to the kitty next Election cycles :thumbsup:

Is there anything older than the Bible that condemns it?

 

[Conky]

Originally posted by: apoppin

Originally posted by: Crazyfool

Originally posted by: fisher
so a man can have sex with another man... but not with his sister? what a twisted world we live in!

Both are perversions but one is working it's way towards political correctness. I don't care to hear about people engaging in either activity but this story is fairly unique. :disgust:

the real 'perverts' are the ones who condemn others for private sex acts between consenting adults . . . the perversion of 'christianity' that judges others.
:thumbsdown:

and what about gay incest? . . . zero chance of genetic mutations
:roll:

I didn't judge anyone nor mention Christianity.

But I stand by my original statement of both being perversions and your added example is no less or more perverse regardless of mutation probabilities. Don't try to change the issue by attacking me based on what you think I may or may not be, butthole. :laugh:

 

[apoppin]

Originally posted by: QuitBanningMe

Originally posted by: dmcowen674

Originally posted by: Mill
Topic Title: God dang I love Alabama
Topic Summary: Man caught fvcking his sister -- only in 'Bama

How lovely!

Dang Red State

Yes, it's sick and there should be no children from such activity (because of a Genetic Scientific reason Red Staters and the Religious don't believe in) but should the consenting adults be arrested and Jailed for 10 years???

I believe it is still a crime for Oral Sex in Bama too.

There should be a Government Official posted in every bedroom and lock up every Baman that violates the Law.

Better start building a lot more prisons down there.

On the plus side people in prison cannot vote so that will add more Blue Northern State votes to the kitty next Election cycles :thumbsup:

Is there anything older than the Bible that condemns it?

Why should anyone really care what a Jewish religious document says?
__________________

Originally posted by: Crazyfool

Originally posted by: apoppin

Originally posted by: Crazyfool

Originally posted by: fisher
so a man can have sex with another man... but not with his sister? what a twisted world we live in!

Both are perversions but one is working it's way towards political correctness. I don't care to hear about people engaging in either activity but this story is fairly unique. :disgust:

the real 'perverts' are the ones who condemn others for private sex acts between consenting adults . . . the perversion of 'christianity' that judges others.
:thumbsdown:

and what about gay incest? . . . zero chance of genetic mutations
:roll:

I didn't judge anyone nor mention Christianity.

But I stand by my original statement of both being perversions and your added example is no less or more perverse regardless of mutation probabilities. Don't try to change the issue by attacking me based on what you think I may or may not be, butthole. :laugh:

I mentioned christianity and judging. You are the butthole that judged them to be "perversions".
:roll:
:thumbsdown:

 

[erikistired]

Originally posted by: dmcowen674

Originally posted by: Mill
Topic Title: God dang I love Alabama
Topic Summary: Man caught fvcking his sister -- only in 'Bama

How lovely!

Dang Red State

Yes, it's sick and there should be no children from such activity (because of a Genetic Scientific reason Red Staters and the Religious don't believe in) but should the consenting adults be arrested and Jailed for 10 years???

I believe it is still a crime for Oral Sex in Bama too.

There should be a Government Official posted in every bedroom and lock up every Baman that violates the Law.

Better start building a lot more prisons down there.

On the plus side people in prison cannot vote so that will add more Blue Northern State votes to the kitty next Election cycles :thumbsup:

it's a shame you are able to afford your internet connection. hasn't the evil W taken it away from you yet? or perhaps the evil georgia government? i might have to call my congressman and suggest it.

 

[Conky]

This thread is probably ready to be moved over to P&N. :laugh:

:beer:

 

[Kadarin]

Originally posted by: apoppin

Originally posted by: QuitBanningMe

Originally posted by: dmcowen674

Originally posted by: Mill
Topic Title: God dang I love Alabama
Topic Summary: Man caught fvcking his sister -- only in 'Bama

How lovely!

Dang Red State

Yes, it's sick and there should be no children from such activity (because of a Genetic Scientific reason Red Staters and the Religious don't believe in) but should the consenting adults be arrested and Jailed for 10 years???

I believe it is still a crime for Oral Sex in Bama too.

There should be a Government Official posted in every bedroom and lock up every Baman that violates the Law.

Better start building a lot more prisons down there.

On the plus side people in prison cannot vote so that will add more Blue Northern State votes to the kitty next Election cycles :thumbsup:

Is there anything older than the Bible that condemns it?

Why should anyone really care what a Jewish religious document says?
__________________

Originally posted by: Crazyfool

Originally posted by: apoppin

Originally posted by: Crazyfool

Originally posted by: fisher
so a man can have sex with another man... but not with his sister? what a twisted world we live in!

Both are perversions but one is working it's way towards political correctness. I don't care to hear about people engaging in either activity but this story is fairly unique. :disgust:

the real 'perverts' are the ones who condemn others for private sex acts between consenting adults . . . the perversion of 'christianity' that judges others.
:thumbsdown:

and what about gay incest? . . . zero chance of genetic mutations
:roll:

I didn't judge anyone nor mention Christianity.

But I stand by my original statement of both being perversions and your added example is no less or more perverse regardless of mutation probabilities. Don't try to change the issue by attacking me based on what you think I may or may not be, butthole. :laugh:

I mentioned christianity and judging. You are the butthole that judged them to be "perversions".
:roll:
:thumbsdown:

A "perversion" is nothing more than a fetish that you don't like.

 

[apoppin]

Originally posted by: Astaroth33


A "perversion" is nothing more than a fetish that you don't like.

gay sex is not a fetish yet some morons judge them to be "pervsersions" (based on an ancient Jewish religious document, i guess)

 

[shimsham]

wtf is with all this red state bullsh!t? every state has rednecks, poor people, idiots, sibling bangers. you name it, they all have it.

grow the fvck up already.:roll:

while i personally think its pretty fvcked up that anyone would want to bang a family member, two consenting people of legal age should be free to do whoever they choose.

 

[NFS4]

Dude, why in the fvck would you want to fvck your sister? Good gawd that is just beyond reproach. And people in here don't seem to have a problem with it morally????:Q:Q:Q:Q:|

What if this bastard had been caught fvcking his (hypothetical) 25 year old daughter? Would you feel the same?

 

[jagec]

Originally posted by: Nebor

Originally posted by: jagec

Originally posted by: Phokus

Originally posted by: spidey07

Originally posted by: fisher
so a man can have sex with another man... but not with his sister? what a twisted world we live in!

pretty f'ed up isn't it.

Yeah, comparing incest to homosexuality is pretty f'ing stupid.

This is going to get me flamed to a crisp, but they're both sexual acts that aren't mainstream, and that are considered morally wrong by many.

You can add oral sex to that list of acts.

true, true. Though it would be more common than the other two.

Originally posted by: Nebor

That's funny, because homosexuality seems pretty mainstream to me.

I wouldn't say ~5% of the population is "mainstream". Depends on your perception, I guess.

Originally posted by: Phokus
My objection to incest (although i support it being legal) is based almost entirely on logical/scientific grounds. I think having people who have offspring in an incestous relationship spoils our gene pool. Also, screwing someone who is a family memeber is creepy. I think it should be legal though.

I see no moral objections to homosexuality other than, 'the bible told me so'. Equating the two is retarded.

I'll steal a page from QuitBanningMe:
"Why? What if they couldn't help being attrated to each other?

Spare me the birth defects arguement. What if they were brothers? "

 

[ElFenix]

Originally posted by: b0mbrman

Originally posted by: ElFenix

Originally posted by: Nebor
Call me a satan worshipping liberal if you will, but why is this against the law? I mean, I understand that it's something that's not looked up on well by society, but a law against it? It seems sort of strange when you think about it.

normally incest involves some sort of unwillingness on the part of one participant.

So why not make it illegal for one person to force another person to have sex with them against their will?

We'll make up a crazy term for it too...like rayp or something like that...

it's usually a more insidious form of abuse than what is commonly recognized for rape.

 

[Kilrsat]

Originally posted by: NFS4
Dude, why in the fvck would you want to fvck your sister? Good gawd that is just beyond reproach. And people in here don't seem to have a problem with it morally????:Q:Q:Q:Q:|

What if this bastard had been caught fvcking his (hypothetical) 25 year old daughter? Would you feel the same?

Isn't the common statement something to the effect of: "What two (perhaps 3, 4, or 5 as well) consenting adults do in the privacy of their own bedroom is not the business of the government."

 

[Nebor]

Originally posted by: NFS4
Dude, why in the fvck would you want to fvck your sister? Good gawd that is just beyond reproach. And people in here don't seem to have a problem with it morally????:Q:Q:Q:Q:|

What if this bastard had been caught fvcking his (hypothetical) 25 year old daughter? Would you feel the same?

Yup.

 

[b0mbrman]

Originally posted by: NFS4
Dude, why in the fvck would you want to fvck your sister? Good gawd that is just beyond reproach. And people in here don't seem to have a problem with it morally????:Q:Q:Q:Q:|

What if this bastard had been caught fvcking his (hypothetical) 25 year old daughter? Would you feel the same?

People have different morals from me and I respect cultural differences. I wouldn't recommend or encourage such activity, but as long as it's done between two consenting adults, I wouldn't vote to outlaw it.

 

[ElFenix]

Originally posted by: apoppin

Originally posted by: ElFenix

Originally posted by: Nebor
Call me a satan worshipping liberal if you will, but why is this against the law? I mean, I understand that it's something that's not looked up on well by society, but a law against it? It seems sort of strange when you think about it.

normally incest involves some sort of unwillingness on the part of one participant.

no . . . it does not . . . look it up in the dictionary . . . it's just sex between relatives.

you're not thinking very hard about that.

the incest is the result of the abuse. it isn't really the incest that is being punished, but the abuse.

 

[ElFenix]

Originally posted by: NFS4
Dude, why in the fvck would you want to fvck your sister? Good gawd that is just beyond reproach. And people in here don't seem to have a problem with it morally????:Q:Q:Q:Q:|

What if this bastard had been caught fvcking his (hypothetical) 25 year old daughter? Would you feel the same?

Topper Harley: Playing to lose is like sleeping with your sister. Sure she's a great piece of tail with a blouse full of goodies, but it's just illegal. Then you get into that whole inbred thing. Kids with no teeth who do nothing but play the banjo... eat apple sauce through a straw... pork farm animals.

 

[NFS4]

Originally posted by: b0mbrman

Originally posted by: NFS4
Dude, why in the fvck would you want to fvck your sister? Good gawd that is just beyond reproach. And people in here don't seem to have a problem with it morally????:Q:Q:Q:Q:|

What if this bastard had been caught fvcking his (hypothetical) 25 year old daughter? Would you feel the same?

People have different morals from me and I respect cultural differences. I wouldn't recommend or encourage such activity, but as long as it's done between two consenting adults, I wouldn't vote to outlaw it.

How about a 45 year old man and his 18 year old daughter? Still OK?

**Shudders** This world is fvcked up

 

[apoppin]

Originally posted by: NFS4
Dude, why in the fvck would you want to fvck your sister? Good gawd that is just beyond reproach. And people in here don't seem to have a problem with it morally????:Q:Q:Q:Q:|

What if this bastard had been caught fvcking his (hypothetical) 25 year old daughter? Would you feel the same?

i wouldn't - even if i had one . . . but i don't care what brothers and sisters do in OTHER families [hopefully it is safe sex]. why should YOU care? it's not "in front of" you. . . . you are not forced to watch.

And SO WHAT if a man or woman has sex with his mentally sound consenting ADULT son or daughter? Why does it bother you what OTHER people do?

 

[shimsham]

Originally posted by: NFS4
Dude, why in the fvck would you want to fvck your sister? Good gawd that is just beyond reproach. And people in here don't seem to have a problem with it morally????:Q:Q:Q:Q:|

What if this bastard had been caught fvcking his (hypothetical) 25 year old daughter? Would you feel the same?

i agree. its pretty sick. but if you extend the same rights to straight and homosexual people, then incestuous couples deserve the same.

:zipuppants; thanks granny!

 

[daniel1113]

The article is socking, but nowhere as shocking as some of the responses in this thread.

 

[b0mbrman]

Originally posted by: ElFenix

Originally posted by: b0mbrman

Originally posted by: ElFenix

Originally posted by: Nebor
Call me a satan worshipping liberal if you will, but why is this against the law? I mean, I understand that it's something that's not looked up on well by society, but a law against it? It seems sort of strange when you think about it.

normally incest involves some sort of unwillingness on the part of one participant.

So why not make it illegal for one person to force another person to have sex with them against their will?

We'll make up a crazy term for it too...like rayp or something like that...

it's usually a more insidious form of abuse than what is commonly recognized for rape.

So outlaw that abuse then, not the consensual sex between two adults.

 

[mobobuff]

Originally posted by: b0mbrman

Originally posted by: ElFenix

Originally posted by: b0mbrman

Originally posted by: ElFenix

Originally posted by: Nebor
Call me a satan worshipping liberal if you will, but why is this against the law? I mean, I understand that it's something that's not looked up on well by society, but a law against it? It seems sort of strange when you think about it.

normally incest involves some sort of unwillingness on the part of one participant.

So why not make it illegal for one person to force another person to have sex with them against their will?

We'll make up a crazy term for it too...like rayp or something like that...

it's usually a more insidious form of abuse than what is commonly recognized for rape.

So outlaw that abuse then, not the consensual sex between two adults.

Nice job on tactfully leaving out the word "related". :roll:

 

[b0mbrman]

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: b0mbrman

Originally posted by: NFS4
Dude, why in the fvck would you want to fvck your sister? Good gawd that is just beyond reproach. And people in here don't seem to have a problem with it morally????:Q:Q:Q:Q:|

What if this bastard had been caught fvcking his (hypothetical) 25 year old daughter? Would you feel the same?

People have different morals from me and I respect cultural differences. I wouldn't recommend or encourage such activity, but as long as it's done between two consenting adults, I wouldn't vote to outlaw it.

How about a 45 year old man and his 18 year old daughter? Still OK?

**Shudders** This world is fvcked up

Yes. They're both adults.

45-year-olds have sex with 18-year-olds all the time (or they could at least) and it's not statutory rape

 

[apoppin]

Originally posted by: ElFenix

Originally posted by: apoppin

Originally posted by: ElFenix

Originally posted by: Nebor
Call me a satan worshipping liberal if you will, but why is this against the law? I mean, I understand that it's something that's not looked up on well by society, but a law against it? It seems sort of strange when you think about it.

normally incest involves some sort of unwillingness on the part of one participant.

no . . . it does not . . . look it up in the dictionary . . . it's just sex between relatives.

you're not thinking very hard about that.

the incest is the result of the abuse. it isn't really the incest that is being punished, but the abuse.

care to prove that? studies? links?

Your opinion?

IF it is really the case - then the ABUSE should be stopped . . . there ARE CURRENT very strong laws already against abuse.

Why should we treat a "symptom" [incest] when we can get the cause [abuse]?