God dang I love Alabama

[79Blazer]

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: apoppin

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: Astaroth33

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: Astaroth33

Originally posted by: NFS4
Dude, why in the fvck would you want to fvck your sister? Good gawd that is just beyond reproach. And people in here don't seem to have a problem with it morally????:Q:Q:Q:Q:|

What if this bastard had been caught fvcking his (hypothetical) 25 year old daughter? Would you feel the same?

If they both were mutually consenting adults, why should I (or you) care?

I don't know how your family situation is, but let's make this hypothetical.

Let's say that you have a mom, a dad and a brother. Let's say that your mom decides that she wants to start fvcking your brother b/c he a nice, young handsome buck and she's tired of your dad's old balls. Your brother and your mom consent to it.

It's not happening under your roof...do you still not care? Sure, it's not the same as Jack and Jill (brother and sister fvcking up the street) but it's still the same principal.

Sure I would care! But... Do I feel that either or both of them should be locked up for 10 years? No, they should not. This would be a "crime" without a victim (well, the only victim would be the person or persons locked up.)

I do not feel that the government has the right to make the decision on this matter.

I NEVER said that I was for locking the guy up. I've never said that. I just said that the "act" of fvcking a sibling was wrong. I have said on at least two occassions that 10 years is a stiff punishment.

But morally, I think it's fuggin' wrong.

Yes you did:

Originally posted by: NFS4
As for the 10 years in jail, that's damn harsh but he shouldn't have been fvcking his sister.

And WHY is it WRONG? WHO set YOU up as JUDGE of morals?
:roll:
Letsee, if i look in YOUR BIBLE i can find examples of "god-condoned" incest . . . do "modern times" [now] make it wrong? Or are you still following the Laws of Moses?

incest is a "cultural thing" . . . it has been approved and disapproved for centuries and practices since the beginning of mankind.

I said that if he hadn't been fvcking around with this sister that he wouldn't have had to worry about it. I never said it was a just punishment.

That being said, TO ME it is just wrong. I don't give a sh!t what the Bible says (Ticket to Hell), I don't give a sh!t what the law says, I don't care what your granny Ida May says...TO ME it's just wrong.

We all have our own set of morals and standards that we live by. Every one of us does. EVERY ONE! We all have things that we WILL and WILL NOT do no matter what. It's human nature. I would never cheat on my GF or my wife (if I were married), I'd never kill a man, I've never done marijuana or used any kind of illicit drugs, I've never been drunk nor do I plan on it and I don't think that fvcking your siblings is right.

PERIOD.

Well said! :thumbsup:

 

[Zebo]

Originally posted by: Astaroth33

Legislating morality, in my opinion, is WRONG.

That's what i keep saying about murder and theft.

 

[apoppin]

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: apoppin

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: Astaroth33

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: Astaroth33

Originally posted by: NFS4
Dude, why in the fvck would you want to fvck your sister? Good gawd that is just beyond reproach. And people in here don't seem to have a problem with it morally????:Q:Q:Q:Q:|

What if this bastard had been caught fvcking his (hypothetical) 25 year old daughter? Would you feel the same?

If they both were mutually consenting adults, why should I (or you) care?

I don't know how your family situation is, but let's make this hypothetical.

Let's say that you have a mom, a dad and a brother. Let's say that your mom decides that she wants to start fvcking your brother b/c he a nice, young handsome buck and she's tired of your dad's old balls. Your brother and your mom consent to it.

It's not happening under your roof...do you still not care? Sure, it's not the same as Jack and Jill (brother and sister fvcking up the street) but it's still the same principal.

Sure I would care! But... Do I feel that either or both of them should be locked up for 10 years? No, they should not. This would be a "crime" without a victim (well, the only victim would be the person or persons locked up.)

I do not feel that the government has the right to make the decision on this matter.

I NEVER said that I was for locking the guy up. I've never said that. I just said that the "act" of fvcking a sibling was wrong. I have said on at least two occassions that 10 years is a stiff punishment.

But morally, I think it's fuggin' wrong.

Yes you did:

Originally posted by: NFS4
As for the 10 years in jail, that's damn harsh but he shouldn't have been fvcking his sister.

And WHY is it WRONG? WHO set YOU up as JUDGE of morals?
:roll:
Letsee, if i look in YOUR BIBLE i can find examples of "god-condoned" incest . . . do "modern times" [now] make it wrong? Or are you still following the Laws of Moses?

incest is a "cultural thing" . . . it has been approved and disapproved for centuries and practices since the beginning of mankind.

I said that if he hadn't been fvcking around with this sister that he wouldn't have had to worry about it. I never said it was a just punishment.

That being said, TO ME it is just wrong. I don't give a sh!t what the Bible says (Ticket to Hell), I don't give a sh!t what the law says, I don't care what your granny Ida May says...TO ME it's just wrong.

We all have our own set of morals and standards that we live by. Every one of us does. EVERY ONE! We all have things that we WILL and WILL NOT do no matter what. It's human nature. I would never cheat on my GF or my wife (if I were married), I'd never kill a man, I've never done marijuana or used any kind of illicit drugs, I've never been drunk nor do I plan on it and I don't think that fvcking your siblings is right.

PERIOD.

i don't think it is "right" either . . . but then 'so what?'

And would you not kill a man if you were defending your family and had no other choice - except to see your wife raped, your children killed and then die?

the points about the marijuana or drinking are non sequitur . . . it is not morally wrong to use it or to drink alcohol [period].

I don't give a sh!t what YOU say, I don't care what your granny Ida May says...TO ME it just doesn't matter.

 

[QuitBanningMe]

Originally posted by: GeekDrew

Originally posted by: QuitBanningMe

Originally posted by: StormRider

Originally posted by: QuitBanningMe

Originally posted by: StormRider
When you think about it, if you have no problems with homosexuality then it's sort of hipocritical to be against sex between consenting *any* adults.

I personally think that homosexuality is not morally wrong but I don't hate people who do. I do think that homosexuality isn't right on a certain level (basically, it should be clear that men and women belong together -- the parts just don't "fit" right on a man and a man relationship) but it's normal on a higher level (God seems to have design the world to have variety -- variety is the spice of life).


Anyways, I think what some people are saying is:

if you think that consentual incest is digusting and wrong, then what makes you so different from people who think homosexuality is disgusting and wrong? And if you make hateful statements about such people then it's sort of like the pot calling the kettle black.

I hate when people say this (bolded). Please read Leviticus.

God's design is to let you have free will and choose what you want. Just because you choose something doesn't mean he approves.

I don't think the majority of homosexuals is by choice. I think they were born with that trait. So that would be like God creating someone to be gay and disapproving of it.

Well read the fvcking Bible. It is pretty clear.

And any of us should care what the Bible says, why?

I'm gay. This is public knowledge, and has been for years. I grew up in a church, reading the Bible. If I could be straight, I would be. Being gay isn't exactly a walk in the park. It's not a choice for me. God knows I've tried to change.

But anyway, this thread is about incest, not homosexuality. They sometimes cross, and I don't see anything wrong with homosexual incest especially, but that's not the discussion being focused on in this thread.

Get off your gay high horse. I was just informing what God said cause he seemed to be confused.

<--doesn't care if you fvck pink donkeys. Thinks it is sick? yes. Care?.no

 

[apoppin]

Originally posted by: QuitBanningMe

Originally posted by: apoppin

Originally posted by: QuitBanningMe

Originally posted by: StormRider

Originally posted by: QuitBanningMe

Originally posted by: StormRider
When you think about it, if you have no problems with homosexuality then it's sort of hipocritical to be against sex between consenting *any* adults.

I personally think that homosexuality is not morally wrong but I don't hate people who do. I do think that homosexuality isn't right on a certain level (basically, it should be clear that men and women belong together -- the parts just don't "fit" right on a man and a man relationship) but it's normal on a higher level (God seems to have design the world to have variety -- variety is the spice of life).


Anyways, I think what some people are saying is:

if you think that consentual incest is digusting and wrong, then what makes you so different from people who think homosexuality is disgusting and wrong? And if you make hateful statements about such people then it's sort of like the pot calling the kettle black.

I hate when people say this (bolded). Please read Leviticus.

God's design is to let you have free will and choose what you want. Just because you choose something doesn't mean he approves.

I don't think the majority of homosexuals is by choice. I think they were born with that trait. So that would be like God creating someone to be gay and disapproving of it.

Well read the fvcking Bible. It is pretty clear.

Letsee, OTHER than the Jewish Laws - which have ZERO to do with christians - and "st Paul" (a self-confessed fanatic Jew turned christian), it is strangely silent.

Wouldn't you think Jesus would have mentioned it if it was important?

If you think Jewish laws have nothing to do with cristians you do not understand Christianity at all.

I was just informing what God said cause he seemed to be confused.

it appears i do understand christianity better than you do
:roll:

 

[NFS4]

Originally posted by: apoppin

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: apoppin

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: Astaroth33

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: Astaroth33

Originally posted by: NFS4
Dude, why in the fvck would you want to fvck your sister? Good gawd that is just beyond reproach. And people in here don't seem to have a problem with it morally????:Q:Q:Q:Q:|

What if this bastard had been caught fvcking his (hypothetical) 25 year old daughter? Would you feel the same?

If they both were mutually consenting adults, why should I (or you) care?

I don't know how your family situation is, but let's make this hypothetical.

Let's say that you have a mom, a dad and a brother. Let's say that your mom decides that she wants to start fvcking your brother b/c he a nice, young handsome buck and she's tired of your dad's old balls. Your brother and your mom consent to it.

It's not happening under your roof...do you still not care? Sure, it's not the same as Jack and Jill (brother and sister fvcking up the street) but it's still the same principal.

Sure I would care! But... Do I feel that either or both of them should be locked up for 10 years? No, they should not. This would be a "crime" without a victim (well, the only victim would be the person or persons locked up.)

I do not feel that the government has the right to make the decision on this matter.

I NEVER said that I was for locking the guy up. I've never said that. I just said that the "act" of fvcking a sibling was wrong. I have said on at least two occassions that 10 years is a stiff punishment.

But morally, I think it's fuggin' wrong.

Yes you did:

Originally posted by: NFS4
As for the 10 years in jail, that's damn harsh but he shouldn't have been fvcking his sister.

And WHY is it WRONG? WHO set YOU up as JUDGE of morals?
:roll:
Letsee, if i look in YOUR BIBLE i can find examples of "god-condoned" incest . . . do "modern times" [now] make it wrong? Or are you still following the Laws of Moses?

incest is a "cultural thing" . . . it has been approved and disapproved for centuries and practices since the beginning of mankind.

I said that if he hadn't been fvcking around with this sister that he wouldn't have had to worry about it. I never said it was a just punishment.

That being said, TO ME it is just wrong. I don't give a sh!t what the Bible says (Ticket to Hell), I don't give a sh!t what the law says, I don't care what your granny Ida May says...TO ME it's just wrong.

We all have our own set of morals and standards that we live by. Every one of us does. EVERY ONE! We all have things that we WILL and WILL NOT do no matter what. It's human nature. I would never cheat on my GF or my wife (if I were married), I'd never kill a man, I've never done marijuana or used any kind of illicit drugs, I've never been drunk nor do I plan on it and I don't think that fvcking your siblings is right.

PERIOD.

i don't think it is "right" either . . . but then 'so what?'

And would you not kill a man if you were defending your family and had no other choice - except to see your wife raped, your children killed and then die?

the points about the marijuana or drinking are non sequitur . . . it is not morally wrong to use it or to drink alcohol [period].

I don't give a sh!t what YOU say, I don't care what your granny Ida May says...TO ME it just doesn't matter.

Which is why we have a discussion board to discuss differing viewpoints...:roll:

No one here is right. You are no more right than I am. But all we can do is see each other's side of the equation.

As for me KILLING someone for raping/attempting to rape my wife? I think I'd be more distraught of the fact that I KILLED someone than to the fact that my wife was raped as long as I did everything in my power to stop it. I'd probably beat the crap out of the person, but I wouldn't go about KILLING them.

 

[GeekDrew]

Originally posted by: apoppin

Originally posted by: QuitBanningMe

Originally posted by: apoppin

Originally posted by: QuitBanningMe

Originally posted by: StormRider

Originally posted by: QuitBanningMe

Originally posted by: StormRider
When you think about it, if you have no problems with homosexuality then it's sort of hipocritical to be against sex between consenting *any* adults.

I personally think that homosexuality is not morally wrong but I don't hate people who do. I do think that homosexuality isn't right on a certain level (basically, it should be clear that men and women belong together -- the parts just don't "fit" right on a man and a man relationship) but it's normal on a higher level (God seems to have design the world to have variety -- variety is the spice of life).


Anyways, I think what some people are saying is:

if you think that consentual incest is digusting and wrong, then what makes you so different from people who think homosexuality is disgusting and wrong? And if you make hateful statements about such people then it's sort of like the pot calling the kettle black.

I hate when people say this (bolded). Please read Leviticus.

God's design is to let you have free will and choose what you want. Just because you choose something doesn't mean he approves.

I don't think the majority of homosexuals is by choice. I think they were born with that trait. So that would be like God creating someone to be gay and disapproving of it.

Well read the fvcking Bible. It is pretty clear.

Letsee, OTHER than the Jewish Laws - which have ZERO to do with christians - and "st Paul" (a self-confessed fanatic Jew turned christian), it is strangely silent.

Wouldn't you think Jesus would have mentioned it if it was important?

If you think Jewish laws have nothing to do with cristians you do not understand Christianity at all.

it appears better than you do
:roll:

^ truth

 

[illustri]

Originally posted by: Zebo

Originally posted by: Astaroth33

Legislating morality, in my opinion, is WRONG.

That's what i keep saying about murder and theft.

murder and theft aren't illegal because they are immoral, they're illegal to protect the stability of the community that sets standards or rules for inclusion

just like taxes are not moral or immoral, but are defined by law
and there are certainly cases where either murder or theft can be justified morally, but not legally

 

[apoppin]

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: apoppin

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: apoppin

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: Astaroth33

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: Astaroth33

Originally posted by: NFS4
Dude, why in the fvck would you want to fvck your sister? Good gawd that is just beyond reproach. And people in here don't seem to have a problem with it morally????:Q:Q:Q:Q:|

What if this bastard had been caught fvcking his (hypothetical) 25 year old daughter? Would you feel the same?

If they both were mutually consenting adults, why should I (or you) care?

I don't know how your family situation is, but let's make this hypothetical.

Let's say that you have a mom, a dad and a brother. Let's say that your mom decides that she wants to start fvcking your brother b/c he a nice, young handsome buck and she's tired of your dad's old balls. Your brother and your mom consent to it.

It's not happening under your roof...do you still not care? Sure, it's not the same as Jack and Jill (brother and sister fvcking up the street) but it's still the same principal.

Sure I would care! But... Do I feel that either or both of them should be locked up for 10 years? No, they should not. This would be a "crime" without a victim (well, the only victim would be the person or persons locked up.)

I do not feel that the government has the right to make the decision on this matter.

I NEVER said that I was for locking the guy up. I've never said that. I just said that the "act" of fvcking a sibling was wrong. I have said on at least two occassions that 10 years is a stiff punishment.

But morally, I think it's fuggin' wrong.

Yes you did:

Originally posted by: NFS4
As for the 10 years in jail, that's damn harsh but he shouldn't have been fvcking his sister.

And WHY is it WRONG? WHO set YOU up as JUDGE of morals?
:roll:
Letsee, if i look in YOUR BIBLE i can find examples of "god-condoned" incest . . . do "modern times" [now] make it wrong? Or are you still following the Laws of Moses?

incest is a "cultural thing" . . . it has been approved and disapproved for centuries and practices since the beginning of mankind.

I said that if he hadn't been fvcking around with this sister that he wouldn't have had to worry about it. I never said it was a just punishment.

That being said, TO ME it is just wrong. I don't give a sh!t what the Bible says (Ticket to Hell), I don't give a sh!t what the law says, I don't care what your granny Ida May says...TO ME it's just wrong.

We all have our own set of morals and standards that we live by. Every one of us does. EVERY ONE! We all have things that we WILL and WILL NOT do no matter what. It's human nature. I would never cheat on my GF or my wife (if I were married), I'd never kill a man, I've never done marijuana or used any kind of illicit drugs, I've never been drunk nor do I plan on it and I don't think that fvcking your siblings is right.

PERIOD.

i don't think it is "right" either . . . but then 'so what?'

And would you not kill a man if you were defending your family and had no other choice - except to see your wife raped, your children killed and then die?

the points about the marijuana or drinking are non sequitur . . . it is not morally wrong to use it or to drink alcohol [period].

I don't give a sh!t what YOU say, I don't care what your granny Ida May says...TO ME it just doesn't matter.

Which is why we have a discussion board to discuss differing viewpoints...:roll:

No one here is right. You are no more right than I am. But all we can do is see each other's side of the equation.

As for me KILLING someone for raping/attempting to rape my wife? I think I'd be more distraught of the fact that I KILLED someone than to the fact that my wife was raped as long as I did everything in my power to stop it. I'd probably beat the crap out of the person, but I wouldn't go about KILLING them.

look . . . you're the one with the hypothetical situation . . . if you had no other choice but to kill the man who is going to kill your family, would you?

And i said i don't think incest [can we drop the 'between consenting adults' - it's implied from now on] is "right" . . .i also don't think it is "wrong" . . . it just "is".

 

[QuitBanningMe]

I don't think the majority of homosexuals is by choice. I think they were born with that trait. So that would be like God creating someone to be gay and disapproving of it.[/quote]

Well read the fvcking Bible. It is pretty clear.
[/quote]

Letsee, OTHER than the Jewish Laws - which have ZERO to do with christians - and "st Paul" (a self-confessed fanatic Jew turned christian), it is strangely silent.

Wouldn't you think Jesus would have mentioned it if it was important?[/quote]

If you think Jewish laws have nothing to do with cristians you do not understand Christianity at all.[/quote]

I was just informing what God said cause he seemed to be confused.

it appears i do understand christianity better than you do
:roll:[/quote]

How is that? Other than to say moses said that and not God?

Or to say that Jesus threw out all old laws which is BS.

 

[NFS4]

Originally posted by: apoppin

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: apoppin

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: apoppin

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: Astaroth33

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: Astaroth33

Originally posted by: NFS4
Dude, why in the fvck would you want to fvck your sister? Good gawd that is just beyond reproach. And people in here don't seem to have a problem with it morally????:Q:Q:Q:Q:|

What if this bastard had been caught fvcking his (hypothetical) 25 year old daughter? Would you feel the same?

If they both were mutually consenting adults, why should I (or you) care?

I don't know how your family situation is, but let's make this hypothetical.

Let's say that you have a mom, a dad and a brother. Let's say that your mom decides that she wants to start fvcking your brother b/c he a nice, young handsome buck and she's tired of your dad's old balls. Your brother and your mom consent to it.

It's not happening under your roof...do you still not care? Sure, it's not the same as Jack and Jill (brother and sister fvcking up the street) but it's still the same principal.

Sure I would care! But... Do I feel that either or both of them should be locked up for 10 years? No, they should not. This would be a "crime" without a victim (well, the only victim would be the person or persons locked up.)

I do not feel that the government has the right to make the decision on this matter.

I NEVER said that I was for locking the guy up. I've never said that. I just said that the "act" of fvcking a sibling was wrong. I have said on at least two occassions that 10 years is a stiff punishment.

But morally, I think it's fuggin' wrong.

Yes you did:

Originally posted by: NFS4
As for the 10 years in jail, that's damn harsh but he shouldn't have been fvcking his sister.

And WHY is it WRONG? WHO set YOU up as JUDGE of morals?
:roll:
Letsee, if i look in YOUR BIBLE i can find examples of "god-condoned" incest . . . do "modern times" [now] make it wrong? Or are you still following the Laws of Moses?

incest is a "cultural thing" . . . it has been approved and disapproved for centuries and practices since the beginning of mankind.

I said that if he hadn't been fvcking around with this sister that he wouldn't have had to worry about it. I never said it was a just punishment.

That being said, TO ME it is just wrong. I don't give a sh!t what the Bible says (Ticket to Hell), I don't give a sh!t what the law says, I don't care what your granny Ida May says...TO ME it's just wrong.

We all have our own set of morals and standards that we live by. Every one of us does. EVERY ONE! We all have things that we WILL and WILL NOT do no matter what. It's human nature. I would never cheat on my GF or my wife (if I were married), I'd never kill a man, I've never done marijuana or used any kind of illicit drugs, I've never been drunk nor do I plan on it and I don't think that fvcking your siblings is right.

PERIOD.

i don't think it is "right" either . . . but then 'so what?'

And would you not kill a man if you were defending your family and had no other choice - except to see your wife raped, your children killed and then die?

the points about the marijuana or drinking are non sequitur . . . it is not morally wrong to use it or to drink alcohol [period].

I don't give a sh!t what YOU say, I don't care what your granny Ida May says...TO ME it just doesn't matter.

Which is why we have a discussion board to discuss differing viewpoints...:roll:

No one here is right. You are no more right than I am. But all we can do is see each other's side of the equation.

As for me KILLING someone for raping/attempting to rape my wife? I think I'd be more distraught of the fact that I KILLED someone than to the fact that my wife was raped as long as I did everything in my power to stop it. I'd probably beat the crap out of the person, but I wouldn't go about KILLING them.

look . . . you're the one with the hypothetical situation . . . if you had no other choice but to kill the man who is going to kill your family, would you?

And i said i don't think incest [can we drop the 'between consenting adults' - it's implied from now on] is "right" . . .i also don't think it is "wrong" . . . it just "is".

Not that I agree with it at all, killing someone out of "no lack of other options" is not the same as fvcking your sibling b/c your wife is tiresome.

 

[apoppin]

Originally posted by: QuitBanningMe

If you think Jewish laws have nothing to do with cristians you do not understand Christianity at all.

I was just informing what God said cause he seemed to be confused.

it appears i do understand christianity better than you do
:roll:[/quote]

How is that? Other than to say moses said that and not God?

Or to say that Jesus threw out all old laws which is BS.[/quote]

How is that?

Jesus law - the essence of what is known as "christianity" is LOVE . . . not the judgemental crap of his Jewish religious contemporaries.
--------------------------------

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: apoppin

look . . . you're the one with the hypothetical situation . . . if you had no other choice but to kill the man who is going to kill your family, would you?

And i said i don't think incest [can we drop the 'between consenting adults' - it's implied from now on] is "right" . . .i also don't think it is "wrong" . . . it just "is".

Not that I agree with it at all, killing someone out of "no lack of other options" is not the same as fvcking your sibling b/c your wife is tiresome.

now you are getting the point . . . my "hypothetical situation" is exactly like yours - UNRELATED to what's happening with the incest in alabama.

 

[QuitBanningMe]

Originally posted by: apoppin

Originally posted by: QuitBanningMe

Letsee, OTHER than the Jewish Laws - which have ZERO to do with christians - and "st Paul" (a self-confessed fanatic Jew turned christian), it is strangely silent.

Wouldn't you think Jesus would have mentioned it if it was important?

If you think Jewish laws have nothing to do with cristians you do not understand Christianity at all.

I was just informing what God said cause he seemed to be confused.

it appears i do understand christianity better than you do
:roll:[/quote]

How is that? Other than to say moses said that and not God?

Or to say that Jesus threw out all old laws which is BS.[/quote]

How is that?

Jesus law - the essence of what is known as "christianity" is LOVE . . . not the judgemental crap of his Jewish religious contemporaries.
--------------------------------
[/b]

First:
Matt 5:18-20
For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.

Second Jesus wasn't quite the peace loving hippy you think he was. He actually favored stiffer penalties when it came to breaking some of the laws or "judgemental crap" of his Jewish religious contemporaries

 

[NFS4]

Originally posted by: apoppin

Originally posted by: QuitBanningMe

If you think Jewish laws have nothing to do with cristians you do not understand Christianity at all.

I was just informing what God said cause he seemed to be confused.

it appears i do understand christianity better than you do
:roll:

How is that? Other than to say moses said that and not God?

Or to say that Jesus threw out all old laws which is BS.[/quote]

How is that?

Jesus law - the essence of what is known as "christianity" is LOVE . . . not the judgemental crap of his Jewish religious contemporaries.
--------------------------------

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: apoppin

look . . . you're the one with the hypothetical situation . . . if you had no other choice but to kill the man who is going to kill your family, would you?

And i said i don't think incest [can we drop the 'between consenting adults' - it's implied from now on] is "right" . . .i also don't think it is "wrong" . . . it just "is".

Not that I agree with it at all, killing someone out of "no lack of other options" is not the same as fvcking your sibling b/c your wife is tiresome.

now you are getting the point . . . my "hypothetical situation" is exactly like yours - UNRELATED to what's happening with the incest in alabama.
[/quote]

That still doesn't discount the fact that I think that it's fvcked up. Incest is Incest...fvcking your sister is fvcking your sister. Legal or not, it's fvcking disgusting

 

[apoppin]

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: apoppin

Originally posted by: QuitBanningMe

If you think Jewish laws have nothing to do with cristians you do not understand Christianity at all.

I was just informing what God said cause he seemed to be confused.

it appears i do understand christianity better than you do
:roll:

How is that? Other than to say moses said that and not God?

Or to say that Jesus threw out all old laws which is BS.

How is that?

Jesus law - the essence of what is known as "christianity" is LOVE . . . not the judgemental crap of his Jewish religious contemporaries.
--------------------------------

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: apoppin

look . . . you're the one with the hypothetical situation . . . if you had no other choice but to kill the man who is going to kill your family, would you?

And i said i don't think incest [can we drop the 'between consenting adults' - it's implied from now on] is "right" . . .i also don't think it is "wrong" . . . it just "is".

Not that I agree with it at all, killing someone out of "no lack of other options" is not the same as fvcking your sibling b/c your wife is tiresome.

now you are getting the point . . . my "hypothetical situation" is exactly like yours - UNRELATED to what's happening with the incest in alabama.
[/quote]

That still doesn't discount the fact that I think that it's fvcked up. Incest is Incest...fvcking your sister is fvcking your sister. Legal or not, it's fvcking disgusting to ME[/quote]
fixed for ya



i have no problem with the fact that you personally find some things to be disgusting

. . . some foods are like that for me.

 

[Nebor]

Come on, just a little more...

 

[BigJ]

I don't think it should be illegal, but I will think you and your sibling are sick bastards for doing so.

 

[dquan97]

Florida?

 

[apoppin]

Originally posted by: Nebor
Come on, just a little more...

a little more . . . what?

 

[Nebor]

Originally posted by: apoppin

Originally posted by: Nebor
Come on, just a little more...

a little more . . . what?

Discussion!

 

[Zebo]

Them are some ugly ass quotes above.

Illin, You're mumbo jumbo does'nt convince me. Every law we have has a moral basis for implementation.

 

[thegimp03]

Man that's a funny article. hahaha...

 

[Shame]

Originally posted by: Nebor

Originally posted by: DAGTA

Originally posted by: Nebor

Originally posted by: jagec
This is going to get me flamed to a crisp, but they're both sexual acts that aren't mainstream, and that are considered morally wrong by many.

You can add oral sex to that list of acts.

Oral sex isn't mainstream? Seems it is to me.

That's funny, because homosexuality seems pretty mainstream to me.

You aren't posting from Earth, are you?

 

[apoppin]

Originally posted by: Nebor

Originally posted by: apoppin

Originally posted by: Nebor
Come on, just a little more...

a little more . . . what?

Discussion!

ok . . . you start.

i pretty much said what was on my mind . . . . never got that reply on what "christianity" really is [other than "love"] . . .

-------------------

Originally posted by: Zebo
Them are some ugly ass quotes above.

Illin, You're mumbo jumbo does'nt convince me. Every law we have has a moral basis for implementation.

Some laws are purely for "protection" of society.

How does prohibiting incest protect society? What moral basis - other than dead religious books - prohibits incest?

edited again

 

[illustri]

laws like:

It is illegal to wear a fake mustache that causes laughter in church.

link