Originally posted by: johnjohn320
Originally posted by: Aflac
Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004
You want buds or sealed cans.
All you need to know ....
In ear type:
http://www.headphone.com/produ...phones/in-ear-monitor/
Sealed/noise canceling:
http://www.headphone.com/produ...d-and-noise-canceling/
I have these and love them:
http://www.headphone.com/produ...nheiser-hd-280-pro.php
The best thing about headphone.com is that they are enthusiast and are brutally honest about the headphones in their write ups.
Since he's coming from Grado SR60s, I would definitely not recommend the HD 280 Pros. The sound difference between the two is... jarring, to say the least. I dislike the HD280 Pros very very much. Although, since the OP is using them for classical, he may not notice...
HD-25 IIs will sound more similar to the Grados, though. I haven't heard them, but I've read impressions of them and I nearly bought these as a replacement for my Grados.
Anyway, OP - passive noise cancelling (sealing headphones) >>>>>>>>>> active noise cancelling (Bose and most headphones marketed as "noise cancelling"). If they use batteries, they're active noise cancelling.
Thanks for the input. Can I ask for elaboration? With the first paragaph especially; but can you also explain why passive's better? Are the active ones just too prone to problems (the popping and whatnot that's been mentioned by others?)
With active noise cancellation, you are adding something to the signal. With passive sound attenuation, you are just sealing out the noise rather than covering it up with an approximate inverse of the noise.
Since you are used to the sound of grado, your ears are used to a boost in the 10khz range with a slight boost in the mid-upper bass. This is grado's signature sound quality and stands out from many of the other manufacturers. Of course, sound quality has more requirements than just frequency response, but frequency response is an important specification and tells you how a headphone is voiced.
Your SR-60 isn't as good as the SR-125, but here is a graph of the SR-125 showing the "signature" grado curve: Grado
Here is the "signature" sennheiser open headphone curve: Senn 555
Here is the Sennheiser closed 280 pro: 280pro
The sennheiser HD25: HD25
The Denon D2000 for kicks: D2000
I personally own the Grado SR-125 and have modified its voicing by parametric equilization so that it is closer to that of the D2000 until I can save up enough $$ for the D2000. My ears like the sound of a flat FR with slightly boosted mid-bass for headphones.
If you like the sound of the Grado as it is, that is important information for you to eliminate other models of headphones that do not have close to the FR of the Grado.
AKG makes some headphones that may have similar sound, the K240 Studio for example might work out, but you really need to audition it yourself. Buying a pair of headphones that do not fit your subjective requirements will just lead to headphones collecting dust on the side of your desk.
AKG K240 Studio
Of course, if you are curious about FR, Isolation, harmonic distortion, Impedance profile of most of the headphones HeadRoom sells, they have measured them. You can use this tool on their website as I have for all my posts in this thread: Headphone Measurements