Yeah I realized after what he was getting at. That would seem a huge stretch to me.
Also this part:
I'm sure the guy started an argument with the purpose of shooting these teens.
He's being lawfully detained while they investigate. I'm sure he'll be released shortly.
Being in a situation where you have to shoot someone to prevent your own death is never good.
However, from the details present in the article it looks like a justified shooting in self-defense.
The only way it could be murder is if the shooter planned to provoke a group of kids into beating him up with a baseball bat so he could shoot them... um yeah.
Also one of the teens presumably fled or possibly was held at gunpoint until authorities arrived. Indicating to me that the shooting stopped when the threat to his life was ended.
Unless some shocking details come out the article is describing an act of self-defense.
Janitor suspected of killing Milwaukee teens is released from jail
Read more from Journal Sentinel: http://www.jsonline.com/news/crime/...jail-b99225538z1-250355061.html#ixzz2vxdytw8U
Would your opinion change if you knew the shooter had an extensive felony criminal record? I am betting the shooter has a record and that is why they are holding him. If he has a record, he can't legally have a gun. If he can't legally have a gun, he ultimately can be charged and imprisoned for that.
I can't remember, did we decide that bshole = ausm?
Um, this is Wisconsin, we are a little more civilized up here. We do NOT tolerate vigilantes like they do down south.
If ausm is a devastatingly handsome man with a gorgeous blonde wife and two beautiful children, if ausm scored 3 touchdowns in one glorious high school football game (one of them being an interception run back), if ausm was the most popular kid in his high school, if ausm is a software wizard, if ausm is all these things then ausm is me. Heres a hint, he isnt!
Quit talking about me in an attempt to hijack the thread and concentrate on the topic.
Um, this is Wisconsin, we are a little more civilized up here. We do NOT tolerate vigilantes like they do down south.
but not civilized enough to not beat a guy 3 on 1 and use a bat. LOL
from what little we know I will say justified shot.
but not civilized enough to not beat a guy 3 on 1 and use a bat. LOL
from what little we know I will say justified shot.
That article told me something interesting. In WI the police CANNOT disclose who had a concealed carry permit.
thats a far cry from NY which publishes them in the newspaper.
JKing106 is the other guess.I can't remember, did we decide that bshole = ausm?
Go fuck yourself proggie scumbag.
Wisconsin is one of the fucked up states without common sense stand your ground laws. Did the murder try to retreat enough and make every possible means to retreat from his justifiable beating?
Yeah what a bunch of crap. Making someone who initiates a conflict have to exhaust all possible options if it backfires before they start shooting.
You really are the poster boy for who gun owners should fear when it comes to promoting the cause.
Here is the statute:
Basically I think they are giving exception 939.48(2)(c)(c) a good look over right now.......
939.48(2)(c)(c) A person who provokes an attack, whether by lawful or unlawful conduct, with intent to use such an attack as an excuse to cause death or great bodily harm to his or her assailant is not entitled to claim the privilege of self-defense.
If this had been done with Trayvon and Zimmerman it may not have exploded as big as it did. I'm all for actually investigating a situation and not just taking a person at their word. At first glance it would appear he was justified in the shooting. But seeing as two people are dead it's probably best they give this more than just a glance.