Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Originally posted by: adairusmc
If you want some good inexpensive guns to get started, look at a Ruger 10/22 (there is no better .22 for the money, period) for a rifle, and either a Ruger or Browning buckmark to start off with a .22 pistol.
I disagree, strongly, about the 10/22. It's a jam-o-matic and it's not as accurate as my Marlin 925. The 10/22 has a very strong following, but I've never cared for it very much. The bolt-action Marlins have always felt better to me and they certainly operate more reliably.
For a pistol, the Ruger Mk III is reliable enough, and quite inexpensive, but I like the Buckmark's grip and operation better; the levers and releases just fit my hands more naturally. You'll want to try out each for yourself though.
ZV
I don't recall mine jamming much, if at all. Then again, who cares? I'm not hunting with it or relying on it for self defense. It is quite accurate and easy to shoot. I put a cheap 4x scope on mine and can plink a golf ball at 50 yards handheld.
It's still a hassle when it happens. My Marlin, on the other hand, never jams and the action never sticks. The 10/22s that I've shot all tend to have the bolt release "stick" and be reluctant to close the bolt again after a magazine is spent.
I know that everybody and his brother just loves the 10/22 but for the life of me I've never been able to figure out why. Give me a bolt-action any day.
EDIT: The 10/22 isn't a "bad" firearm, but it's hardly as exceptional as its reputation would lead one to believe. Like all semi-auto .22LR firearms, it's sensitive to ammo. It's also more difficult to clean than the simpler bolt-action rifles. On the whole, I don't like it as much as I like the bolt-action alternatives.
ZV