brycejones
Lifer
- Oct 18, 2005
- 26,682
- 24,992
- 136
Bite down on those bootstraps.
Sorry bootstraps are only provided with the executive coverage plan, you get a rock.
Bite down on those bootstraps.
Please, I used to buy that both sides are same, and in some cases it may apply, but not in healthcare.
We can agree on addressing costs is the real starting point.
highlights President Donald Trump's role -- or lack of one -- in forging a GOP majority to squeeze the bill through the Senate
How a Senator who supports the bill perceived Trump's grasp of the legislation under debate:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/27/us/health-care-bill-trump-pence.html?_r=1
Nobody should expect Trump to know anything about this bill since Fox News has very little, if any, coverage of it.How a Senator who supports the bill perceived Trump's grasp of the legislation under debate:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/27/us/health-care-bill-trump-pence.html?_r=1
Another developmentally disabled point in your post that others have skipped. They lost control very shortly after they first passed it, and long before it started taking effect. I have an idea: how about you stick to talking about things you understand? Sure, your post count will drop dramatically, but on the plus side, people might forget you're an idiot eventually.Neither do the Dems... If they cared they would have fixed it before they lost control.
...
Apparently Lindsay Graham saying that either they figure this out by Friday that single party talks are over. More threats of a bipartisan fix.
I just saw that too. What a weird world we have now. Who would have guessed Graham would be a limiter on Trump and who would guess he'd be the guy to suggest/threaten bipartisanship?
Maybe the GOP should just drop this bill? Who would even bother to pursue something with this little public support?
Well, Trump.....duh!
And that's the funny part, by the time the ACA actually rolls around to affecting people, they suddenly like it and don't want the govt to take it away, because *surprise* it's actually a step in the right direction.Something else interesting in that poll. In addition to the 17% approval, only 17% think a replacement bill for the ACA should do less than the ACA. That's a remarkably unambiguous indication of where the public is on healthcare. I'm starting to think passing this bill will hurt the GOP more than failing to pass it.
Another poll showing the Senate Healthcare Bill at 17% approval:
http://maristpoll.marist.edu/npr-pbs-newshour-marist-poll/
I think this is the 4th poll showing sub-20's approval. I thought the first one might be an outlier because I've just never seen a piece of legislation poll this badly. But apparently not. All the polls are coming out this way. I have to think the GOP will drum up support from their base for it after it passes, and the number will rise. However, I don't see it ever going much beyond 30%. Maybe the GOP should just drop this bill? Who would even bother to pursue something with this little public support?
I'd reject it solely based on a two-day turnaround, there's no way it'll be coherent in that kind of timeframe.McConnell is trying to revise the bill by Friday and resubmit it to the CBO. That's not a lot of time to do all the horse trading that would be required even if the goal is achievable. Sounds like a Hail Mary.
Trump is working hard to see the bill through. Reuters reported that he spent much of Thursday and Friday in phone conversations with Republican senators, including Ted Cruz and majority leader Mitch McConnell. Cruz opposes the bill in its current form.
But the president’s efforts are hindered by the fact that he seems to care more about signing a bill than he does about the policy issues at stake. Several senators who have spoken with Trump about the evolving legislation describe an executive with little apparent understanding of the basic principles of the reforms and virtually no understanding of the details.
I'd reject it solely based on a two-day turnaround, there's no way it'll be coherent in that kind of timeframe.
They won't. Some (the legitimate ones) won't back down because it actually hurts the people they represent. The asinine ones won't back down because they've got no skin to lose by making Trump look like the bad guy (everyone else is at this point, for good reason). Trump will blame congress for not 'getting stuff done', so his remaining 25% or whatever won't turn on him. Basically a big dickwaving contest with nothing out of it (other than maintaining the ACA, which to me is a win at this point).Several Senators have continued to make major public demands on the bill and I don't see how they go back at this point. I mean it's possible but I don't think it's looking good for the Rs.
Also It's not like Trump will provide any cover when this thing goes south and a bunch of his voters realize how hard they've just been done. He'll blame congress.
Apparently Lindsay Graham saying that either they figure this out by Friday that single party talks are over. More threats of a bipartisan fix.
Sorry bootstraps are only provided with the executive coverage plan, you get a rock.