Reminds me of Dole after the '96 campaign. He seemed livelier after the election was over.Originally posted by: astroview
I don't usually post at P&N, but this fits.
Gore actually gave a good speech tonight at the DNC convention. Much nicer and much better than anything he gave in 2000. He looked lifelike.
Originally posted by: daveshel
His 'it's time for them to go' speech in 1992 was one of the best political speeches I've ever heard. Maybe in 2000 he was a little preoccupied with how much Clinton's indiscretions had hurt his chances.
Originally posted by: conjur
Reminds me of Dole after the '96 campaign. He seemed livelier after the election was over.
Originally posted by: TheSnowman
Originally posted by: conjur
Reminds me of Dole after the '96 campaign. He seemed livelier after the election was over.
i think that was the viagra.
Originally posted by: astroview
I don't usually post at P&N, but this fits.
Gore actually gave a good speech tonight at the DNC convention. Much nicer and much better than anything he gave in 2000. He looked lifelike.
Originally posted by: astroview
I don't usually post at P&N, but this fits.
Gore actually gave a good speech tonight at the DNC convention. Much nicer and much better than anything he gave in 2000. He looked lifelike.
Ashame because clearly the Country would've been better off with Gore and this should be "Four More For Gore".
Originally posted by: loki8481
Originally posted by: TheSnowman
Originally posted by: conjur
Reminds me of Dole after the '96 campaign. He seemed livelier after the election was over.
i think that was the viagra.
but his wife has sure turned into the MegaB!tch from Hell... anyone see her interview on Fox News talking about John Edwards? I kinda wanted to punch her in the face.
I blame the viagra for this as well
Originally posted by: Siddhartha
How many people vote for a person based on how they deliver a speech instead of the content of the speech?
Originally posted by: CADMaster
Originally posted by: Siddhartha
How many people vote for a person based on how they deliver a speech instead of the content of the speech?
If it were the case that the content of the speech was the deciding factor, then there would be no Liberals elected to government.
Originally posted by: biostud666
And why is that?
Originally posted by: Siddhartha
How many people vote for a person based on how they deliver a speech instead of the content of the speech?