- Feb 13, 2003
- 13,295
- 118
- 106
Originally posted by: arcenite
I wouldn't like those results. That sucks for a V8.
Originally posted by: arcenite
I wouldn't like those results. That sucks for a V8.
Originally posted by: arcenite
I wouldn't like those results. That sucks for a V8.
lolOriginally posted by: arcenite
I wouldn't like those results. That sucks for a V8.
Originally posted by: arcenite
I wouldn't like those results. That sucks for a V8.
Originally posted by: DaTT
Originally posted by: arcenite
I wouldn't like those results. That sucks for a V8.
Seeing as its rated at 300BHP, 273 RWHP is an excellent number
Originally posted by: KLin
Originally posted by: DaTT
Originally posted by: arcenite
I wouldn't like those results. That sucks for a V8.
Seeing as its rated at 300BHP, 273 RWHP is an excellent number
If you figure 15% loss through the powertrain, that's ~320 BHP.
Originally posted by: CraigRT
a stock 4.7L Dakota will dyno in the 200 range.. it's a reasonably quick truck too.
Originally posted by: C6FT7
What is the purpose of this?
If the car moves does running this test prove anything else?
Originally posted by: andylawcc
Originally posted by: CraigRT
a stock 4.7L Dakota will dyno in the 200 range.. it's a reasonably quick truck too.
well, aren't truck engine focus on torque than Horsepower?
Toyota's 4.7L on the LX470 and Land Cruiser has like 300hp, and the smaller 4.3L on the LS and SC has more hp.
Originally posted by: C6FT7
What is the purpose of this?
If the car moves does running this test prove anything else?
Originally posted by: nourdmrolNMT1
Originally posted by: C6FT7
What is the purpose of this?
If the car moves does running this test prove anything else?
if you are upgrading you get a baseline, figure out what the basline of the motor is.
you then swap a part.
figure out what it adds.
maybe reswap that part with another see what that adds.
etc.