cKGunslinger
Lifer
- Nov 29, 1999
- 16,408
- 57
- 91
Originally posted by: classy
People naming their kids after seasons and colors are not uncommon. Just like people name their children after all kinds of things. And you probably come a typical caucasian background where any name from a different culture might seem odd. But if you can't see the silliness in naming a child Superman, well to each is own I guess. Why not name him The Hulk, Spiderman, Flash, Batman, The Atom, Green Lantern, or how about, here's a good one, Sub Zero. :roll:
On side note, are you Gunslinger aka Quake player Gunslinger?
So you believe there is a point where *everyone* can agree a name is "silly"? Doesn't the simple fact that there *are* people who want to name their children these names prove not everyone agrees? You say it's ok for parent to give their kid the same name as a color, but "Doo-Doo Brown" is a color. Is that ok? What about if Mrs. Parker wants to name her son "Peter'? Should that be disallowed, since it's the name of a superhero?
What about hair styles? I think dyeing your blonde hair is silly. But it's not too odd. But what about dyeing it green and purple and putting it in a giant mohawk? I think that many people would agree that would be silly. Should we make it illegal then?
My whole point is that if seems silly for the government to be able to, or even feel the need to, make silly laws to limit what an individual can name thier kid. I think those "riced-out" Honda Civics with huge spoilers, ground effects, giants pipes, and NOS stickers are the stupidest things I've ever seen. But would I support a law that says you shouldn't be able to waste money like that? No, because apparently some people like them and it doesn't hurt me in the least, so what difference does it make?
Umm.. I dunno about the "Quake player Gunslinger," but I'm guessing no. I've had this handle for 4-5 years now, and I did use to play some Quake 2 back in the day, however.