Graphics Card and WoW

GeordieLife

Member
Jul 7, 2008
51
0
0
OK.

The question has been asked many times. However, I only really play one game.

"My name is Stewart, and I'm a Warcrack addict".

I understand that WoW is supposed to be better with nVidia. Anyone any experience of running 4870/4850 with WoW?

Thanks in advance!
 

raddreamer3kx

Member
Oct 2, 2006
193
0
0
If your certain WoW is the only game you play get something like a 8800gt which are pretty cheap now, if you think you will be playing more graphic intense games in the future get yourself something like the 4850 which play pretty much any game out there right now. Why spend $280-$300 when you dont need to. Also what card do you have now, if WoW plays fine on it why not just keep the card you have now?
 

Pooptacular

Member
Sep 3, 2005
126
0
0
With the new graphical updates to WoW (mainly shadows), I would go with a nice card to max the game out. Google WoW beta shadows to take a look at whats going on.
 

Magusigne

Golden Member
Nov 21, 2007
1,550
0
76
Warcraft is more CPU intensive than GPU intensive I believe.

My 7800GT Worked wonders.

I don't think it would matter if you were to buy a 4850 or an run WoW...an 8800GT Can about max out WoW on everything up to a 1920x12 with in cities. A 4850 is definately faster than an 8800GT.

I'm an NVIDIOT personally, but when the prices of the 8800/9800GT's are still as expensive as the 4850's then I'd say just spend 150 and get a 4850.

Maybe wait until the ATI 4850's start coming out with dual slot coolers.
 

CalvinHobbes

Diamond Member
Feb 27, 2004
3,524
0
0
I use an 8800GT (512) in my gaming PC which is primarily used for WOW. I get 75fps almost all of the time. In really busy cities it drops down to ~60 fps. I'm not sure how much Wrath will change things but for the price and 8800GT/S is a great card.
 

TaylorTech

Member
Jul 24, 2008
78
0
0
My 7600GT, which is ancient, runs at 1280x1024 on max just fine.

I'd say get a HD4870 for future-proofing your computer. It's about $100 more, but well worth the upgrade.
 

Denithor

Diamond Member
Apr 11, 2004
6,300
23
81
I'll second that the CPU is more important than the GPU for WoW. I run at 1920x1200 (all visuals maxed) on an 8800GT 256MB and the worst I see is in Shatt with 30fps (very slight stutter at its busiest). And that's while I'm still running the F@H GPU client in the background.

Now I have an 8800GTS 512MB coming ($115, go eBay + Live cashback!!) and I expect to never drop below 50ish with the crunching + WoW. That should hold me over until they beef up the graphics in WoW or I get addicted to a different variety of crack.
 

TaylorTech

Member
Jul 24, 2008
78
0
0
Go stand in Sunwell and watch the rates plummet.

Screw that place. Raiding there on max with this card is like flipping through a motion book one page at a time.

WoW isn't as CPU intensive as you think. Loading screens and such sure, but everything is in the .mpq files already, doesn't take much to process them.

I could guarantee you while my 2.4GHz Sempron isn't much, if I got an AGP 3850 I could max out everywhere at higher resolutions and be fine. Then it would probably be my RAM bottlenecking >.<

If it's not one thing, it's another.
 

Joeydubbs

Senior member
Jun 11, 2008
214
2
81
I agree, those cards are overkill for wow. Wow looks great on my machine using an old AGP nvid 6800. Make sure you have at least a gig of RAM, wow likes RAM...that being said, its a great time to buy a video card, lots of value out there with cheap 8800GT's and 4850's...
 

nitromullet

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2004
9,031
36
91
Between the 4870 and the GTX 260, the GTX 260 is hands down the better card for WoW. As many have said, these cards are somewhat overkill for what is needed to play WoW, but with the higher end cards you can start to crank up Anti-Aliasing ("multi sampling on the WoW video menu).

Here's what you do if you want to play WoW at the best looking settings with the best fps.

1) Pick up a GTX 260
2) Grab nHancer from http://nhancer.com
3) bump up all the settings to max in the game (make sure to set multi sampling to 8x)
4) In nHancer, go to your WoW profile (should aleady be in there) and do the following:
Set AA to: "combined", "8xS", "Enhance in game setting", and "super transparency AA"
Set AF to: "16x", and on the Optimizations tab select "High Quality" Texture Filtering
5) You're done.

This will allow to to play WoW at its best with solid fps through out.

With a 4870 you can get similar quality, but it will really only be playable through out at 4x multi sampling.

Granted, both play the game well no doubt about it, but between the two I definitely prefer the the GTX 260 (and I've owed both).
 

Jax Omen

Golden Member
Mar 14, 2008
1,654
2
81
TaylorTech, your problem is ENTIRELY CPU-limited. You're running on a freaking Sempron 2.4ghz.

Girlfriend had a A64 2.2ghz and a 7600GS. WoW ran alright but lagged bad in big towns.

Same CPU with an 8800GTS 320: still bad lag in towns.

C2D E2180 + 7600GS = no lag.

It's CPU limited.
 

udneekgnim

Senior member
Jun 27, 2008
247
0
0
WoW is a CPU limited game

I have a 4400+ X2 and ATI 4870 w/ 2 GB RAM & Windows XP

going from a 16*10 resolution with 8 AA to a 12*7 resolution with no AA in Shat nets no difference in framerate

the biggest factor in performance was changing View Distance, but framerates still were not incredibly improved in Shat with the shortest View Distance setting
 

GeordieLife

Member
Jul 7, 2008
51
0
0
GX260 seems to be the answer.

I'm running Q6600, Asus P5Q Deluxe, 4Gb GSkill ram, SpinPoints...8800GTS, which is fine, but seems that it's developed a fault and I'm getting a lot of BSOD. Still hasn't gone away since I changed all of the components apart from graphics card.

Time to upgrade. Running 1680x1050 with 2 x 22" screens. Usually play wow on one, watch some videos on the other.

Thanks for taking the time to reply
 

dakels

Platinum Member
Nov 20, 2002
2,809
2
0
I would also say that the CPU will limit your FPS more then a reasonable new GPU. My 4850 can handle any FPS in wow it seems below 1920 with max details on, max range, AA, etc. What slows my comp down is CPU based from what I can tell. Q6600 at 2.4ghz = 35fps sags in shatt, at 3.1ghz 50-55fps sags in shatt.
 

Shortass

Senior member
May 13, 2004
908
0
76
Originally posted by: nitromullet
Between the 4870 and the GTX 260, the GTX 260 is hands down the better card for WoW. As many have said, these cards are somewhat overkill for what is needed to play WoW, but with the higher end cards you can start to crank up Anti-Aliasing ("multi sampling on the WoW video menu).

Here's what you do if you want to play WoW at the best looking settings with the best fps.

1) Pick up a GTX 260
2) Grab nHancer from http://nhancer.com
3) bump up all the settings to max in the game (make sure to set multi sampling to 8x)
4) In nHancer, go to your WoW profile (should aleady be in there) and do the following:
Set AA to: "combined", "8xS", "Enhance in game setting", and "super transparency AA"
Set AF to: "16x", and on the Optimizations tab select "High Quality" Texture Filtering
5) You're done.

This will allow to to play WoW at its best with solid fps through out.

With a 4870 you can get similar quality, but it will really only be playable through out at 4x multi sampling.

Granted, both play the game well no doubt about it, but between the two I definitely prefer the the GTX 260 (and I've owed both).

Interesting post, but why would you suggest that GTX 260 can handle AA better than the 4870? All reviews out there seem to point towards ATI having significantly better performance at 8x.
 

nitromullet

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2004
9,031
36
91
Originally posted by: Shortass
Originally posted by: nitromullet
Between the 4870 and the GTX 260, the GTX 260 is hands down the better card for WoW. As many have said, these cards are somewhat overkill for what is needed to play WoW, but with the higher end cards you can start to crank up Anti-Aliasing ("multi sampling on the WoW video menu).

Here's what you do if you want to play WoW at the best looking settings with the best fps.

1) Pick up a GTX 260
2) Grab nHancer from http://nhancer.com
3) bump up all the settings to max in the game (make sure to set multi sampling to 8x)
4) In nHancer, go to your WoW profile (should aleady be in there) and do the following:
Set AA to: "combined", "8xS", "Enhance in game setting", and "super transparency AA"
Set AF to: "16x", and on the Optimizations tab select "High Quality" Texture Filtering
5) You're done.

This will allow to to play WoW at its best with solid fps through out.

With a 4870 you can get similar quality, but it will really only be playable through out at 4x multi sampling.

Granted, both play the game well no doubt about it, but between the two I definitely prefer the the GTX 260 (and I've owed both).

Interesting post, but why would you suggest that GTX 260 can handle AA better than the 4870? All reviews out there seem to point towards ATI having significantly better performance at 8x.

I don't suggest that the GTX 260 can handle AA better. I say that in my experience, the GTX 260 handles transparency AA better than the 4870 in WoW specifically.

The thing about most of the AA benchmarks on the web is that they don't generally focus on transparency AA. They simply notch it up to 4xAA and run benchmarks. Also, they never benchmark WoW. Apparently, the general consensus is that a high end video card is not anything you would want if you're a WoW player, yet I've brought every single high end card I've owned in the past two years to its knees with this MMO.

WoW and transparency AA seem to be a special case for some reason. You can run 16x AA in WoW with a lot of cards if you don't use transparency or use inferior IQ settings like CSAA.

Up to this point, the GTX 200s are the ONLY cards I've seen that can run WoW with 8x trSSAA (8x ADAA 'box'/'super sampling' is the IQ equivalent for ATI). While a lot of cards will run these settings smoothly for a large part of the game, there are places where they tank down to the teens. This includes cards/setups like: 8800GTX, 8800GTS 512, 8800GT SLI, 9800GX2, 3870X2, 4850, and 4870.

I'm not sure as to what the exact reason for this is, but my suspicion is memory bandwidth. WoW doesn't put a lot of stress on the shaders, but it appears that running higher levels of high quality transparency AA (@ 1920x1200) pushes the bandwidth limits of most high end cards. The odd (and disappointing) part about the 4870 is that is has roughly equal bandwidth to the GTX 260.

Another important thing to note about my post is that I mention nHancer. The reason for this is that the AA setting I use in WoW is not available in the NV control panel, but works great and provides the best IQ IMO.
 

Shortass

Senior member
May 13, 2004
908
0
76
Originally posted by: nitromullet
Originally posted by: Shortass
Originally posted by: nitromullet
Between the 4870 and the GTX 260, the GTX 260 is hands down the better card for WoW. As many have said, these cards are somewhat overkill for what is needed to play WoW, but with the higher end cards you can start to crank up Anti-Aliasing ("multi sampling on the WoW video menu).

Here's what you do if you want to play WoW at the best looking settings with the best fps.

1) Pick up a GTX 260
2) Grab nHancer from http://nhancer.com
3) bump up all the settings to max in the game (make sure to set multi sampling to 8x)
4) In nHancer, go to your WoW profile (should aleady be in there) and do the following:
Set AA to: "combined", "8xS", "Enhance in game setting", and "super transparency AA"
Set AF to: "16x", and on the Optimizations tab select "High Quality" Texture Filtering
5) You're done.

This will allow to to play WoW at its best with solid fps through out.

With a 4870 you can get similar quality, but it will really only be playable through out at 4x multi sampling.

Granted, both play the game well no doubt about it, but between the two I definitely prefer the the GTX 260 (and I've owed both).

Interesting post, but why would you suggest that GTX 260 can handle AA better than the 4870? All reviews out there seem to point towards ATI having significantly better performance at 8x.

I don't suggest that the GTX 260 can handle AA better. I say that in my experience, the GTX 260 handles transparency AA better than the 4870 in WoW specifically.

The thing about most of the AA benchmarks on the web is that they don't generally focus on transparency AA. They simply notch it up to 4xAA and run benchmarks. Also, they never benchmark WoW. Apparently, the general consensus is that a high end video card is not anything you would want if you're a WoW player, yet I've brought every single high end card I've owned in the past two years to its knees with this MMO.

WoW and transparency AA seem to be a special case for some reason. You can run 16x AA in WoW with a lot of cards if you don't use transparency or use inferior IQ settings like CSAA.

Up to this point, the GTX 200s are the ONLY cards I've seen that can run WoW with 8x trSSAA (8x ADAA 'box'/'super sampling' is the IQ equivalent for ATI). While a lot of cards will run these settings smoothly for a large part of the game, there are places where they tank down to the teens. This includes cards/setups like: 8800GTX, 8800GTS 512, 8800GT SLI, 9800GX2, 3870X2, 4850, and 4870.

I'm not sure as to what the exact reason for this is, but my suspicion is memory bandwidth. WoW doesn't put a lot of stress on the shaders, but it appears that running higher levels of high quality transparency AA (@ 1920x1200) pushes the bandwidth limits of most high end cards. The odd (and disappointing) part about the 4870 is that is has roughly equal bandwidth to the GTX 260.

Another important thing to note about my post is that I mention nHancer. The reason for this is that the AA setting I use in WoW is not available in the NV control panel, but works great and provides the best IQ IMO.

Hmm, nice. WoW certainly can give a newer rig a run for it's money. Right before I quit I played it on my current rig and was finally able to enter Shatt without the slightest hitch. It was glorious.

AA is certainly a funny creature. So many options, such performance disparities. Gah.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |