And how was the performance in that game? Any improvements?I ran Lotro at this speed for about 19 minutes and the most I got was 76-78 deg C with 31/66/94/57 core loads in log file.
And how was the performance in that game? Any improvements?
OC'd it to 3.9 GHz (Only turbos to that speed, with retaining most everything in auto, and setting max watts/amps to 250) and ran Prime 95 blend test and temps got to 92-95 in a minute. I ran Lotro at this speed for about 19 minutes and the most I got was 76-78 deg C with 31/66/94/57 core loads in log file.
If you want to buy now, a 4GB 380X. If you want to hang on 6 months, 14nm GPUs will be here.
Did you do anything with Vcore voltage?
I left the Vcore voltage on auto, so it is adjusting itself as needed. Core Temp only logs frequency, temp, load, and watts, so I don't know what the voltage is going to exactly.
Ok... that might work for now. If you start having stability problems, you may have to manually adjust the vCore. As I mentioned, at least in my case, I dropped the vCore while still getting a decent OC; lower voltage helped me get my temps under control. I was in the low 90C's at 4.1GHz until I lowered vCore.
90's in prime 95 or another similar program? I am getting 90's in prime 95 with stock hsf, suspect it will lower significantly new hsf. With LOTRO game play I am only getting 80 max, and that is about as taxing as I will be on the computer, so again with new hsf it should be much lower and very safe.
My low fps is nothing new, and I suspect that at least part of it is poor game code and poor server performance. My really low fps is mostly in 12+ raids and in the moors, which is simply the most intense part of the game where you would expect the lowest performance. If switching graphic settings between different custom settings was easier I would simply go from custom high settings to custom low settings and put up with the poor picture quality in exchange for better fps. I did run a 3 man instance (Iorbar's Peak if you are curious) with 2 others after the server first got switched over but before they took them down to fix the issues, and it was barely playable. The performance made the challenge on T2C almost impossible to complete even with 3 players.
I just found out/realized Blade and Soul uses PhysX. I can imagine this is why a lot of AMD users reported issues during the closed betas.
Probably not. If it's the GPU flavor of PhysX it just wouldn't run. CPU PhysX is basically fine, even the older "unoptimized" versions were competitive or superior to other engines like bullet.