Greenpeace rams Japanese ship.

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Grunt03

Diamond Member
Jun 24, 2000
3,131
0
0
Wow, it's to bad that this group has completely lost control and focus on what they are about and their goals. It has become nonething but a Terrorist Organization conducting terrorist acts......
 

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
The whaler could easily have turned the other way or even tried putting her engines astern. But as both videos show, apart from blasting on the loudspeaker she took no action EVEN THOUGH SHE WAS THE VESSEL REQUIRED TO DO SO.
It is fairly obvious from the video that the Greenpeace boat was intent on ramming the whaling ship...no evasive actions in the world will prevent a collision with asshats intent on stirring up controversy.
 

Stifko

Diamond Member
Dec 8, 1999
4,799
2
81
Originally posted by: Agrooreo
That greenpeace captian has some balls though.

Yeah he does, and I bet that he doesn't think that an ant or a whale are essentially the same in so far as expendibility.


 

GroundedSailor

Platinum Member
Feb 18, 2001
2,502
0
76
Originally posted by: Hayabusa Rider

So if a smaller vessel intentionally rams the larger less manuverable one, it's the larger's fault? It seems that the Greenpeace boat was intent on this happening regardless of the action taken by the whaler.

BTW, if this is the case, how is Greenpeace allowed to own and operate ships anyway?

I don't know about intentionally - if that were true then that vessel is at fault.

Size has nothing to do with who keeps out of whose way. Look at rule 1 which basically says these rules apply to ALL vessels. Rule 18 defines which type of vessel keeps out of others. Who keeps out of the way is further defined by the situation - covered by rules 4 thro 19.

If a vessel is restricted by her ability to maneuver then there are specific lights or shapes she has to display and others will keep out of her way (rule 18) The restriction has to be genuine, simply displaying the lights or shapes will not hold up in any court.

There is no restriction in ownership of ships. If you have the money you can buy a ship and run it for whatever legal purpose you want.






 

GroundedSailor

Platinum Member
Feb 18, 2001
2,502
0
76
Originally posted by: Starbuck1975
The whaler could easily have turned the other way or even tried putting her engines astern. But as both videos show, apart from blasting on the loudspeaker she took no action EVEN THOUGH SHE WAS THE VESSEL REQUIRED TO DO SO.
It is fairly obvious from the video that the Greenpeace boat was intent on ramming the whaling ship...no evasive actions in the world will prevent a collision with asshats intent on stirring up controversy.

That is true but what the video shows is something else. The greenpeace ship took action to avoid collision byt the whaler took none despite being required to do so.

Look I'm no great fan of Greenpeace but that clip is clear on the whalers fault.




 

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
That is true but what the video shows is something else. The greenpeace ship took action to avoid collision byt the whaler took none despite being required to do so.
I think if it is proven that the Greenpeace ship intentionally created the conditions for the collision, that is a different story.

Kind of like these knucklehead illegal immigrant scams in SoCal where illegal drivers purposely slam on their brakes, knowing that if you hit them, you are at fault...unless it can be proven that you intentionally staged the accident to make money off the subsequent insurance claims and lawsuits.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Originally posted by: GroundedSailor
Originally posted by: Starbuck1975
The whaler could easily have turned the other way or even tried putting her engines astern. But as both videos show, apart from blasting on the loudspeaker she took no action EVEN THOUGH SHE WAS THE VESSEL REQUIRED TO DO SO.
It is fairly obvious from the video that the Greenpeace boat was intent on ramming the whaling ship...no evasive actions in the world will prevent a collision with asshats intent on stirring up controversy.

That is true but what the video shows is something else. The greenpeace ship took action to avoid collision byt the whaler took none despite being required to do so.

Look I'm no great fan of Greenpeace but that clip is clear on the whalers fault.


Uhh the greenpeace ship stopped and started again and hit the ship. That destroys their idea of avoiding anything.
 

Proletariat

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2004
5,614
0
0
Originally posted by: ZeGermans
Originally posted by: Duckzilla
Killing whales is one of the greatest evils of the modern era. With a nation as advanced as the 'Nese, you?d think they shouldn't want to kill intelligent, graceful mammals like whales.

Advanced, or backwards? History will record it.

When it come right down to it, they aren?t much different than they were 6o+ years ago.

yes, being one of the most industrious nations in the world, with an giant economy at a fraction of the size of most other major industrial nations, all the while maintaining their ancient dignity in most everyday life is certainly equal to raping and murdering several thousand people.

Wow Japanese fanboy to the rescue!

What ancient dignity? They're pretty much transplanted Chinese who hate the Chinese.

They've never fought a war with any honor either, first they were saved by hurricanes then they slaughtered millions in Asia and used kamikaze.
 

AragornTK

Senior member
Dec 27, 2005
207
0
0
um... Japanese and Chinese are nothing alike... other than their languages sounding similar to us foreigners...

It's like saying Scandinavians and Russians are the same...
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Originally posted by: Stifko
Originally posted by: Agrooreo
That greenpeace captian has some balls though.

Yeah he does, and I bet that he doesn't think that an ant or a whale are essentially the same in so far as expendibility.


Oh no he does'nt he beleives humans are expendible and whales are superior based on his wreckless actions. If he sunk the ships and 40-50 people died I'm sure he'd gone to the maker belieing he had done the right thing.
 

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
They've never fought a war with any honor either, first they were saved by hurricanes then they slaughtered millions in Asia and used kamikaze.
Kamikazi is a pretty honorable way to go out...intentionally sacrificing oneself for Emperor and country...I think its more a cultural difference, as American and Allied forces during WW2 could never understand the stubborn and suicidal Japanese forces who refused to surrender even in the face of defeat.

That being said, I fully support Japanese kamikaze of Greenpeace boats.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Originally posted by: Starbuck1975
They've never fought a war with any honor either, first they were saved by hurricanes then they slaughtered millions in Asia and used kamikaze.
Kamikazi is a pretty honorable way to go out...intentionally sacrificing oneself for Emperor and country...I think its more a cultural difference, as American and Allied forces during WW2 could never understand the stubborn and suicidal Japanese forces who refused to surrender even in the face of defeat.

That being said, I fully support Japanese kamikaze of Greenpeace boats.

I bet the suicide bombers think the same. I've always considered it took a certain amount of balls moreso even than Kamikazes since they actually do it sober unlike the opium laced japs.
 

csiro

Golden Member
May 31, 2001
1,261
0
0

What's the captain saying? I can only make out "Warning! Warning! This is the [...] captain. Stop your [...] immediately. Keep away from our ship, or we will have to [...] off".
 

GroundedSailor

Platinum Member
Feb 18, 2001
2,502
0
76
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: GroundedSailor
Originally posted by: Starbuck1975
The whaler could easily have turned the other way or even tried putting her engines astern. But as both videos show, apart from blasting on the loudspeaker she took no action EVEN THOUGH SHE WAS THE VESSEL REQUIRED TO DO SO.
It is fairly obvious from the video that the Greenpeace boat was intent on ramming the whaling ship...no evasive actions in the world will prevent a collision with asshats intent on stirring up controversy.
That is true but what the video shows is something else. The greenpeace ship took action to avoid collision byt the whaler took none despite being required to do so.

Look I'm no great fan of Greenpeace but that clip is clear on the whalers fault.


Uhh the greenpeace ship stopped and started again and hit the ship. That destroys their idea of avoiding anything.
Lets be fair here. The Greenpeace ship was moving slowly all the time - look at both videos again. You can see the bow wake.


 

Proletariat

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2004
5,614
0
0
Originally posted by: AragornTK
um... Japanese and Chinese are nothing alike... other than their languages sounding similar to us foreigners...

It's like saying Scandinavians and Russians are the same...

Uh they are actually from China.

Ainu were the original inhabitants of Japan.
 

Purgatory-Z

Senior member
Jan 17, 2000
270
0
0
Originally posted by: Proletariat
Originally posted by: ZeGermans
Originally posted by: Duckzilla
Killing whales is one of the greatest evils of the modern era. With a nation as advanced as the 'Nese, you?d think they shouldn't want to kill intelligent, graceful mammals like whales.

Advanced, or backwards? History will record it.

When it come right down to it, they aren?t much different than they were 6o+ years ago.

yes, being one of the most industrious nations in the world, with an giant economy at a fraction of the size of most other major industrial nations, all the while maintaining their ancient dignity in most everyday life is certainly equal to raping and murdering several thousand people.

Wow Japanese fanboy to the rescue!

What ancient dignity? They're pretty much transplanted Chinese who hate the Chinese.

They've never fought a war with any honor either, first they were saved by hurricanes then they slaughtered millions in Asia and used kamikaze.

That's a less than intelligent remark. To call the Japanese dishonorable is a complete travesty. I suggest you research their history before making such comments.
 

Proletariat

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2004
5,614
0
0
Originally posted by: Purgatory-Z
Originally posted by: Proletariat
Originally posted by: ZeGermans
Originally posted by: Duckzilla
Killing whales is one of the greatest evils of the modern era. With a nation as advanced as the 'Nese, you?d think they shouldn't want to kill intelligent, graceful mammals like whales.

Advanced, or backwards? History will record it.

When it come right down to it, they aren?t much different than they were 6o+ years ago.

yes, being one of the most industrious nations in the world, with an giant economy at a fraction of the size of most other major industrial nations, all the while maintaining their ancient dignity in most everyday life is certainly equal to raping and murdering several thousand people.

Wow Japanese fanboy to the rescue!

What ancient dignity? They're pretty much transplanted Chinese who hate the Chinese.

They've never fought a war with any honor either, first they were saved by hurricanes then they slaughtered millions in Asia and used kamikaze.

That's a less than intelligent remark. To call the Japanese dishonorable is a complete travesty. I suggest you research their history before making such comments.

I've researched their history genious.

Have you?
 

Meuge

Banned
Nov 27, 2005
2,963
0
0
Originally posted by: Purgatory-Z
Originally posted by: Proletariat
Originally posted by: ZeGermans
Originally posted by: Duckzilla
Killing whales is one of the greatest evils of the modern era. With a nation as advanced as the 'Nese, you?d think they shouldn't want to kill intelligent, graceful mammals like whales.

Advanced, or backwards? History will record it.

When it come right down to it, they aren?t much different than they were 6o+ years ago.

yes, being one of the most industrious nations in the world, with an giant economy at a fraction of the size of most other major industrial nations, all the while maintaining their ancient dignity in most everyday life is certainly equal to raping and murdering several thousand people.

Wow Japanese fanboy to the rescue!

What ancient dignity? They're pretty much transplanted Chinese who hate the Chinese.

They've never fought a war with any honor either, first they were saved by hurricanes then they slaughtered millions in Asia and used kamikaze.

That's a less than intelligent remark. To call the Japanese dishonorable is a complete travesty. I suggest you research their history before making such comments.

Would that history include testing anthrax, dyphtheria, and other biological weapons on tens/hundreds of thousands of chinese in WWII? Or their human experiments around the same period?

None of the surviving civilizations can claim to be honorable... only less evil than others.
 

Czar

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
28,510
0
0
Originally posted by: GroundedSailor
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: GroundedSailor
Originally posted by: Starbuck1975
The whaler could easily have turned the other way or even tried putting her engines astern. But as both videos show, apart from blasting on the loudspeaker she took no action EVEN THOUGH SHE WAS THE VESSEL REQUIRED TO DO SO.
It is fairly obvious from the video that the Greenpeace boat was intent on ramming the whaling ship...no evasive actions in the world will prevent a collision with asshats intent on stirring up controversy.
That is true but what the video shows is something else. The greenpeace ship took action to avoid collision byt the whaler took none despite being required to do so.

Look I'm no great fan of Greenpeace but that clip is clear on the whalers fault.


Uhh the greenpeace ship stopped and started again and hit the ship. That destroys their idea of avoiding anything.
Lets be fair here. The Greenpeace ship was moving slowly all the time - look at both videos again. You can see the bow wake.

the japanese ship was moving alot slower than the greenpeace ship, seems they were just using their momentum to move... slowly
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |