GTX 1080 custom (non-Founders Edition) cards

Page 7 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

sam_816

Senior member
Aug 9, 2014
432
0
76
So why are you upgrading from a 780Ti then? If you didn't care about $, you'd do 780Ti -> 980 -> 980Ti/Titan X -> 1080.
I wonder the same thing. on one hand i read ppl saying 'oh i dont mind upgrading every gen since i have so much money to spend on the other hand ppl say 980ti makes no sense since 1070 uses x units of energy as compared to x+y of 980 ti'. really!! ppl spent $650+ a year(or so) back & are now ready to shell out another $375-450 now but spending more on power consumption doesnt make sense to them?

Your response is flawed since everyone is affected. Even the gamers who buy $100-200 GPUs are now getting crap that in the past used to cost $50-100. Because $249 560Ti is now a $599-699 1080, that automatically means every single card that used to be below GTX560Ti level card is also going up in price. That means 1050/1050Ti/1060/1060Ti are all going up in price 50-100% vs. historical prices. NV is just cleverly hiding these facts by renaming cards using marketing names (aka 660Ti is now a 1070, 680 is now a 1080 but 680 itself was really just a true 660Ti in the first place. Clever).

and i may add these prices might not seem too high in the US but everywhere else they increase considerably more. ex. 1080 FE is about 900 in india, easily crossing 800 in EU and touching 800 in australia (dnt even want to touch S.America)
at this point many will say USA's economy is good so we r not affected. some will say problems of their economies is their headache but i don't think we can ignore the fact that these ppl contribute to nvidia/amd's revenue. if prices keep increasing like this more ppl will turn to consoles(since rumors of 4k ps4 are already circulating) and that means when revenue targets are revised next gen nvidia/amd will have lesser buyers to reap that revenue.
I am happy for those who have good disposable income but if your disposable income doubles are you ok with paying 20-30-40% more for the similar products even if all other costs of production/logistics etc have not increased that much?
also, when more people will move to consoles the game devs will focus further more on developing primarily for consoles. which means newer cards will look fast even if they are only 20-30&% faster since games won't be that demanding but since prices of gpu will keep increasing more ppl will move to consoles and the cycle keeps repeating.

Of course they are. You think they split a generation into 2 parts because they are bored? They know exactly what they are doing. What's happening right now is a nice parallel to the high-end audiophile market. Guess who else decided to join on the fun? It's simple economics at play. Once NV pulled off the Kepler generation, it's not realistic anything will change. That's because high-end gamers now have no choices period.
thank you for reinforcing my point. ppl are not understanding where i am coming from. i am not against any one company or product, i am concerned about the practices which are slowly but surely hurting the whole market. everyone is ridiculing AMD's pricing for 480Polaris but why wont they set such prices since competition has already set a base price.

Option 1: Buy in on the 1st half of a new generation (that means "flagship" next mid-range cards). Get thrown under the bus a year after when real flagships come out.

Option 2: Buy in on the 2nd half of a new generation (that means true flagship priced at flagship prices -- but these prices keep going up too!). Get thrown under the bus a year after when the next gen mid-range card comes out offering similar performance for nearly half the price.

Between these 2 options, because we know the generations are split into 2 or even 3 parts (get ready for a possible repeat of 680->780->780Ti as we might not even get the true fully unlocked 1080Ti right off the bat), it's now impossible to maintain the resale value of your card forcing you to upgrade far more often than ever.

The only way this will stop is once current gen consoles hold back PC development so much that even a $249 card will run every 2018-2021 AAA game at 1080p 120-140 FPS and 1440p at 60 FPS. But then PS5/XB2 will come out and the cycle will start again.
I think consoles are doing much better now. 1st they have moved from complex architectures PC like architecture & now if the rumors are true they are planning to reduce console life cycle. which means console gamers won't have to wait long to get better looking games on their consoles. i wont be surprised if sony adopts freesync-esc tech in their tvs to provide more fluid experience to playstation players.

My personal way out of this nonsense has been mining. Haven't paid for a single GPU upgrade since 2008 but even I know this perk will run out sooner or later. That's why I am going to try to max out this free bonus feature over the next 1-2 years. Will probably buy 7-12 more mining cards over June-July. Should be enough to get me through to 2020 without paying for GPUs.
I know, you have mentioned about mining before as well and i think its a good thing. I've been living in brazil for 5 years(returning to my country tonight yipeeeee) and electronics sell for 60%-100% more compared to USA. since members of my team visit the US every 2-3 months, a couple of years back i started importing stuff from the US & sell them for 20-30% less(brazilian prices) now i use services like purse and save upto 20% on amazon prices and sell them in brazil for $150-300 margin(even more at launchs) so, i earn about $300 every other month without making effort. my whole skylake build is sponsored through this & i will keep making this extra money as now ppl come to me with requests and i like to help them save a little but i still feel bad for ppl from EU, asia and S. america who has to pay so much extra because of business practices like FE & x80-titan-x80ti & now intel has also joined in.. I wish more and more ppl could buy these 'higher' end gpus so that economies of scale set in even at a better level and reduce the prices for everyone. Also i hope when more ppl buy these gpus game devs come back to develop for PC primarily and push the graphic fidelity. I hope ppl will see my point the way i meant it and not read between the lines.
 
Last edited:

Raising

Member
Mar 12, 2016
120
0
16
I can order hardware from germany without tax around one or two times per year(I can write them off as a business expense) so the two 980tis I bought a year ago cost me 640€ each, 1080s are around that price too, should I dump my two 980tis for around 460€ each and get two 1080s or 1070s ?

Gotta decide fast..
 

ZGR

Platinum Member
Oct 26, 2012
2,054
661
136
I can order hardware from germany without tax around one or two times per year(I can write them off as a business expense) so the two 980tis I bought a year ago cost me 640€ each, 1080s are around that price too, should I dump my two 980tis for around 460€ each and get two 1080s or 1070s ?

Gotta decide fast..

Need more performance now? Otherwise, I'd wait for 1080 ti to drop and go tax free on those. If you don't mind more heat, I would OC the 980 ti's if you haven't already.

If you do need more performance on games that support SLI, than perhaps aftermarket 1070's would be a better deal. That would be a sidegrade to some.
 

jabroni619

Member
Sep 23, 2009
47
0
0
You're not getting it. The 560 Ti wasn't the fastest chip at launch.

He's saying releasing a 699 1080 is like releasing a 699 560Ti. 560Ti never commanded the performance position the 1080 has. It was never the fastest or even close to it, and that wouldn't change even if nVidia released it before the 570/580 because there was another company called AMD which had the performance lead. So no, i'm not proving his point, other than showing he doesn't really have one.
 

imaheadcase

Diamond Member
May 9, 2005
3,850
7
76
So why are you upgrading from a 780Ti then? If you didn't care about $, you'd do 780Ti -> 980 -> 980Ti/Titan X -> 1080.

Your response is flawed since everyone is affected. Even the gamers who buy $100-200 GPUs are now getting crap that in the past used to cost $50-100. Because $249 560Ti is now a $599-699 1080, that automatically means every single card that used to be below GTX560Ti level card is also going up in price. That means 1050/1050Ti/1060/1060Ti are all going up in price 50-100% vs. historical prices. NV is just cleverly hiding these facts by renaming cards using marketing names (aka 660Ti is now a 1070, 680 is now a 1080 but 680 itself was really just a true 660Ti in the first place. Clever).

No..its not flawed, its logical. I don't care about the money, i care about the performance i have when i want it. My upgrade to a 780ti was from a GTX 580, which was also a top of the line card when it came out. When you buy a card, you get the best you can afford for how long you want it to last.

What is flawed is people complaining about price and power draw on cards like this. Majority of people don't even give it a single thought when buying one.
 

Raising

Member
Mar 12, 2016
120
0
16
Need more performance now? Otherwise, I'd wait for 1080 ti to drop and go tax free on those. If you don't mind more heat, I would OC the 980 ti's if you haven't already.

If you do need more performance on games that support SLI, than perhaps aftermarket 1070's would be a better deal. That would be a sidegrade to some.

Not really in need of more performance right now, I use a 1440p 144hz screen.

Though I like shinny new toys and electricity here is not cheap..
 

jabroni619

Member
Sep 23, 2009
47
0
0
No..its not flawed, its logical. I don't care about the money, i care about the performance i have when i want it.

And there it is. Performance. One of the key factors that determines whether or not one deems an upgrade worthwhile. The factor that even in my discussions with him, he seems to be ignoring.
 

exar333

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2004
8,518
8
91
And there it is. Performance. One of the key factors that determines whether or not one deems an upgrade worthwhile. The factor that even in my discussions with him, he seems to be ignoring.

Agree.

I deal with finance enough in work (SDLC in a finance area) that I don't need it in my hobbies as well. For me, re-selling a card for part of the entry price at a later date is a bonus, but not a driving factor to my buying decisions. If a GPU doesn't provide the FPS I need, but can make $1000/year, it is not interesting to me. That would be a better fit in a finance tech sub-forum.

Anyway, back on topic. I wonder if/when we will see a aftermarket card with 2000mhz+ boost out of the box?
 

RussianSensation

Elite Member
Sep 5, 2003
19,458
765
126
I can order hardware from germany without tax around one or two times per year(I can write them off as a business expense) so the two 980tis I bought a year ago cost me 640€ each, 1080s are around that price too, should I dump my two 980tis for around 460€ each and get two 1080s or 1070s ?

Gotta decide fast..

This is a tough call. What makes it so hard is because we need a review of 1070 SLI vs. 1080 SLI to see what the average scaling is. We also need a frame times review of 1070 SLI vs. 1080 SLI with HB bridges and how this compares to 980Ti SLI using conventional bridges. If you want to drop the heat in your room in the summer, moving to 1070 SLI makes sense. If you want to get more performance, moving to 1080 SLI makes sense. You also get brand new warranty on new cards and guaranteed NV driver support. Would you be more happy with more performance or lower power usage?
 

RussianSensation

Elite Member
Sep 5, 2003
19,458
765
126
No..its not flawed, its logical. I don't care about the money, i care about the performance i have when i want it. My upgrade to a 780ti was from a GTX 580, which was also a top of the line card when it came out. When you buy a card, you get the best you can afford for how long you want it to last.

What is flawed is people complaining about price and power draw on cards like this. Majority of people don't even give it a single thought when buying one.

No, you aren't making sense. If money isn't a factor, you'd have the fastest single or SLI or Tri-SLI card from 580->1080 every single year, including 680, 780, 980Ti you skipped. Your 580 was destroyed by 40-80% by a January 2012 7970.
http://m.hardocp.com/article/2012/01/09/amd_radeon_hd_7970_overclocking_performance_review/7#.V03cKfT3bCQ

Don't make statements such as money doesn't matter and you only care about performance; and then we find out you used 580 from 2011 to 2013 when 680/7970/7970Ghz/690/OG Titan/780 all trashed your card by miles.

Your statements completely contradict your own upgrade path.
 
Last edited:

RussianSensation

Elite Member
Sep 5, 2003
19,458
765
126
And there it is. Performance. One of the key factors that determines whether or not one deems an upgrade worthwhile. The factor that even in my discussions with him, he seems to be ignoring.

All you have done since you joined is constantly evade the truth. I will have no problem admitting that 1070 is a GTX660Ti with a price increase should I choose to get it. No one is mad about anyone buying 1070/1080 or 680. The difference is we are man enough to admit that we are laying $400-600 for a next gen mid-range performance in the next generation product stack -- you just try everything you can to ignore the entire history of NV just to defend the current prices. Even if I were coming off Intel iGPU and 1080 was an amazing FPS/$$$ upgrade, it doesn't change the fact that a 256-bit 320GB/sec GP104 is a mid-range Pascal chip in the Pascal family. You just don't like this truth because it means admittance to paying flagship prices for mid-range parts during the 1st half of a new generation. See the difference?
 
Last edited:

exar333

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2004
8,518
8
91
This is a tough call. What makes it so hard is because we need a review of 1070 SLI vs. 1080 SLI to see what the average scaling is. We also need a frame times review of 1070 SLI vs. 1080 SLI with HB bridges and how this compares to 980Ti SLI using conventional bridges. If you want to drop the heat in your room in the summer, moving to 1070 SLI makes sense. If you want to get more performance, moving to 1080 SLI makes sense. You also get brand new warranty on new cards and guaranteed NV driver support. Would you be more happy with more performance or lower power usage?

RS - Guru3D has been doing a lot of the best frame time reviews recently IMHO. They did a frame time analysis for both the 1070/1080 and allude to a SLI FT review soon as well. I would keep an eye out for that...Here is the link to the most recent analysis from the 1070 (non-SLI):

http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/geforce_gtx_1070_fcat_frametime_anaysis_review,16.html
 

RussianSensation

Elite Member
Sep 5, 2003
19,458
765
126
He's saying releasing a 699 1080 is like releasing a 699 560Ti. 560Ti never commanded the performance position the 1080 has. It was never the fastest or even close to it, and that wouldn't change even if nVidia released it before the 570/580 because there was another company called AMD which had the performance lead. So no, i'm not proving his point, other than showing he doesn't really have one.

The 560Ti would have been the fastest card in that era/generation if NV (and the competitor) bifurcated the GF100/110 family towards the 2nd half of that generation series. Same way NV could have easily labeled the GTX460 back then as a 470 card since it beat the 285, or same way NV could have split GeForce 8 into / parts, releasing 8800GT/S first for $599/699, then 8800GTX towards the 2nd part. But it seems that you'll never get this; so I won't even bother trying to explain it to you specifically again.

You even failed to address the point that 1070 is an inferior upgrade against 980Ti/Titan X (570/580GTX predecessors) than 670 was against the 580. You basically have 0 arguments, no data, just keep regurgitating how 560Ti wasn't the fastest card -- a completely flawed argument because NV never split a generation into 2 parts back then. / Yawn.

Next thing you'll try telling us previous 8 NV generations only brought 22-25% increases in performance over the last gen's flaship. Whatever.
 
Last edited:

jabroni619

Member
Sep 23, 2009
47
0
0
The 560Ti would have been the fastest card in that era/generation if NV (and the competitor) bifurcated the GF100/110 family towards the 2nd half of that generation series. Same way NV could have easily labeled the GTX460 back then as a 470 card since it beat the 285, or same way NV could have split GeForce 8 into / parts, releasing 8800GT/S first for $599/699, then 8800GTX towards the 2nd part. But it seems that you'll never get this; so I won't even bother trying to explain it to you specifically again.

You even failed to address the point that 1070 is an inferior upgrade against 980Ti/Titan X (570/580GTX predecessors) than 670 was against the 580. You basically have 0 arguments, no data, just keep regurgitating how 560Ti wasn't the fastest card -- a completely flawed argument because NV never split a generation into 2 parts back then. / Yawn.

No data? What are you talking about? We have data for the 560Ti, we have performance data, we have release date data we have pricing. We have data for the 1080 as well.

We also have data that shows that you (not I) brought up the 560Ti argument and subsequently got destroyed. Now you're mad at yourself for making a correlation where none exists and have fallen back on silly arguments by saying "well if they did this then it would have been the same thing" nonsense. They didn't, and it isn't.

nVidia is not going to compete with themselves any more then they have to. As it stands "small" Pascal's biggest competitor is "big" Maxwell

Here it is in it's most simplest terms. Brace yourself, you're not going to like the sound of this, because you know, it's factual... 1080 is currently the fastest GPU you can buy and it is priced as such. Period.
 
Last edited:

Raising

Member
Mar 12, 2016
120
0
16
This is a tough call. What makes it so hard is because we need a review of 1070 SLI vs. 1080 SLI to see what the average scaling is. We also need a frame times review of 1070 SLI vs. 1080 SLI with HB bridges and how this compares to 980Ti SLI using conventional bridges. If you want to drop the heat in your room in the summer, moving to 1070 SLI makes sense. If you want to get more performance, moving to 1080 SLI makes sense. You also get brand new warranty on new cards and guaranteed NV driver support. Would you be more happy with more performance or lower power usage?

Wouldn't mind both, though at the moment there's really no game I need more performance, even Overwatch is at constant 144fps with both cards at around 65% gpu usage.
 

tential

Diamond Member
May 13, 2008
7,355
642
121
That OC doesn't translate to much added performance though.

See, the thing with the 980Ti is that extra OC gave it quite a bit more power. With Pascal's reduced IPC, the OC is still the same amount (About ~430 over the stock boost clock from guru3d) but see how much less it helps Pascal in games vs the 980Ti in games...

http://www.guru3d.com/articles_page...ce_gtx_980_ti_platinum_edition_review,36.html





This looks a lot less impressive to me OC wise....

Looks like the reason OC didn't clock these high is because the OC gains were not that great and they didn't want to ruin the power consumption.
 

showb1z

Senior member
Dec 30, 2010
462
53
91
I at least expected the custom cards to hit the 2.1Ghz+ shown on stage without much issue.
 

tential

Diamond Member
May 13, 2008
7,355
642
121
It OCs worse than Maxwell, the gains are less from OCing because of the reduced IPC. That summarizes my long post above.
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,575
126
I don't see where they let the fans loose to see what the max OC might be? Looks like they left them at 60%?
 

showb1z

Senior member
Dec 30, 2010
462
53
91
I don't see where they let the fans loose to see what the max OC might be? Looks like they left them at 60%?

In the AB screenshot you can see temperature is stable at 55C at 60% fan speed. So temps aren't the issue.
Maybe it's a power limit, since they blindly upped the volts by +100.
 

imaheadcase

Diamond Member
May 9, 2005
3,850
7
76
No, you aren't making sense. If money isn't a factor, you'd have the fastest single or SLI or Tri-SLI card from 580->1080 every single year, including 680, 780, 980Ti you skipped. Your 580 was destroyed by 40-80% by a January 2012 7970.
http://m.hardocp.com/article/2012/0...verclocking_performance_review/7#.V03cKfT3bCQ

Don't make statements such as money doesn't matter and you only care about performance; and then we find out you used 580 from 2011 to 2013 when 680/7970/7970Ghz/690/OG Titan/780 all trashed your card by miles.

Your statements completely contradict your own upgrade path.

What? You are not understanding people at all. You always quote % for some card way back when that had no relevance to the topic at hand.

The 7970 was Dec 22, 2011
GTX 580 was Nov 9 2010

But since you are not listening, i said i care about performance when i need it and money does not matter. GTX 580 was when i needed it..before the 7970.

If a game comes out i want to play that would be better with SLU 1080s super overclocked i will get it.
 

Timmah!

Golden Member
Jul 24, 2010
1,463
729
136
What? You are not understanding people at all. You always quote % for some card way back when that had no relevance to the topic at hand.

The 7970 was Dec 22, 2011
GTX 580 was Nov 9 2010

But since you are not listening, i said i care about performance when i need it and money does not matter. GTX 580 was when i needed it..before the 7970.

If a game comes out i want to play that would be better with SLU 1080s super overclocked i will get it.

If you would buy 1080 SLI to play "better" a single game, then its safe to say, you would do a justice to your nickname

Otherwise, i am with you on this one. Its not that black and white, when it comes to money. Just because they are not issue for someone, it does not have to mean automatically said person upgrades every single time something newer and faster pops up. I think its more like there are times when money are not the problem - but these occasions come here and now.

EDIT: If the cusotm cards cant really do more than 2,1GHz, then i guess the additional 6-pin or 8-pin is pretty much pointless. And perhaps entire beefed up power delivery system - the only thing worth it is the superior cooler.
 
Last edited:

exar333

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2004
8,518
8
91
If you would buy 1080 SLI to play "better" a single game, then its safe to say, you would do a justice to your nickname

Otherwise, i am with you on this one. Its not that black and white, when it comes to money. Just because they are not issue for someone, it does not have to mean automatically said person upgrades every single time something newer and faster pops up. I think its more like there are times when money are not the problem - but these occasions come here and now.

EDIT: If the cusotm cards cant really do more than 2,1GHz, then i guess the additional 6-pin or 8-pin is pretty much pointless. And perhaps entire beefed up power delivery system - the only thing worth it is the superior cooler.

We may need to wait for a MSI Lightning type model with more voltage control, beefed power delivery and great cooling to see those 2.1ghz+ consistent boosts. That may be a few months...
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |