I am not being defensive, but you are being offensive. You want to say 3d isn't the norm, which I don't disagree, but there exist people who like it, and then there are some who wants to experience it.
Fair enough, I don't disagree that people who might like it exist. If anything, I too was excited to see how it turns out and wished the associated costs were more realistically affordable.
And no, putting the 3d glasses on in a local store for a few minutes really isn't experiencing anything.
I said it is enough for me to know that I don't care for it much. Since I am not one of those fortunate ones that just "happen to" have a 120hz, it is a serious investment I would need to make if I decide to get it. I have given a demo several tries, and none of those sessions were convincingly good to prompt any action on my part. Would it get better with better games with more adept implementation? Possibly. Would I sell my limbs to rush out to get it with blind faith? No chance in hell. Notice that I didn't say 3d vision is hoax or anything, I said I didn't like it enough.
What proof do you want? Do you want a proof that Nvidia has a piece of hardware called 3d vision that allows users to play games in 3d? Or do you want a proof that ATI don't have such technology? Are you looking for a proof that people are buying 120hz LCDs/TVs? Or are you looking for a proof that people need a new DP adepter to use eyefinity? Please be specific.
I see you enjoy beating around the bush, but I rest the case since you seemed to have agreed having a 120hz ready is only a "what if" scenario, not a norm for a significant number of potential GPU consumers.
This sentence is nothing but trolling. I linked a post from a person who brought a 120hz but are now stuck. It is not a conceptual case, but a practical one.
Sensitive much? You present your case with an isolated, weak example heraled by a "what if" clause, then you go on to say you don't like playing what-if games. Something didn't jive right, I was pointing that out.
I may have misintepreted some of your intentions. But never have I used a single anecdote to rationalize a theory in any of my posts in this thread.
I don't know how did you come to a conclusion that I say "120hz LCD is a norm." I did pointed out, which provided a link as a proof, that there exist people who have 120hz LCDs. And yes, one person had a problem and there is only one person who spent the time to research and help. That is me, not you. Thank you.
If you truly did not mean to use that example to claim having 120hz display isn't too unusual in a casual setting, then indeed I was assuming things there, my applogies. You made it a bit too suggestive by quoting RussianSensation's post about prohibitive cost of ownership turning 3d vision insgnificant in the real world, immediately followed by your little story of helping another dude. Looked like you were using that as a counter to the quoted text.
As you see, my replies to your questions are just like troll post too, but I don't know another way to reply. I hope there are Mods who will handle such posts.
Posts are trollish if only you percieve them that way. I don't see any trolling in my posts, but you see some in your own. Good.
I never say ATI is bad, or Nvidia is better, all I said is 460 is a good product and IMO ATI will need to react by price readjustments or new products.
Again, totally irrelevant. I am not sure what made you want to throw this in there, I never asked your opinion or discussed any of this. Oh btw, yes 460 looks great. That's the card I will be recommending to my gamer friends for the time being.