When the 480 was released this forum became a bane for NV's fans.So if there is a problem with AMD cards why it is wrong to point them out?
Pointing out a problem is one thing, claiming a potential problem for some users who notice microstutter then making a general statement that AMD CF is bad or non-functional is fanboyism to the core.
So next time its best to rephrase such statements, perhaps as such: "if you notice microstutters and its a problem for you, NV may have an edge in multi-GPU". Note: "may" because frame-time is a poor measurement as attested by the original techreport's own writer of the microstutter article.
ps. The price at $999 is perfectly justifiable, its a HALO product, it offers similar performance/OC headroom as gtx680 SLI with a significant power use reduction and less noise than SLI. Just because its expensive doesn't mean its a rip-off. There's plenty of ppl who would buy it at those prices, not going to be an issue at all.
edit: gotta love [H]'s conclusion: "The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 is the finest looking, best performing, most efficient dual-GPU video card in the world with unsurpassed design and engineering. The GeForce GTX 690 not only performs in terms of framerate, but also performs in terms of thermals, TDP, acoustics, and aesthetics. This is the "most perfect" dual-GPU video card we've ever experienced." ----- next time some troll claims [H] is AMD biased, they deserve to be ban because its clearly trolling.