GTX 980Ti finally launched - MSRP $649 - Reviews

Page 25 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

moonbogg

Lifer
Jan 8, 2011
10,637
3,095
136
Everything is one loop in my system; single reservoir and one pump. There is no point in two independent loops, imo, unless it is for aesthetics and wanting two different colours of coolants in your tubing etc. The main idea is to have enough radiator for your heat output. I think a 480 rad could just mange two 980ti and your CPU, alternately a 360 and a 240 would be better and definitely enough rad.

The rules change from vendor to vendor as far as warranty. All you need is an AIB that allows removing the cooler. When you want to sell it you can just put the air cooler back on. I usually try to sell the cards with the waterblocks.

OK, so one pump, one reservoir but possibly two radiators. Does the size of the reservoir matter? Does it help cooling performance to have a large pool of liquid, or will it work just as well if you barely had enough to fill the loop and with only a small reservoir?
I'm excited about getting 2 or 300 more Mhz on the CPU, adding enough boost to the 980TI's to match or beat all the aftermarket cards and to do it all fairly quietly and looking sexy as hell to boot.
 

tential

Diamond Member
May 13, 2008
7,355
642
121
I think a Lot of people would disagree with you on this. If people already happily pay $649 for a reference 980Ti with 10% less shaders, a TX at this same price would be great. A custom cooler or block would be pretty cheap to add...

The real issue here is that the original Titan offered more memory and unique DP features not on other GPUs from NV. Now, it just has 12GB vs. 6GB memory BUT is held-back by only using the reference PCB and cooling. I agree this is a pretty big drawback and the TX will be much less desirable for anyone looking to OC once the really good custom 980Tis arrive. I wonder if NV will re-think the Titan strategy to allows for more customization? It would be relatively easy to offer the same board SKUs we will see between the TX and the 980Ti if it was allowed.
I'm sure they would. Doesn't change the fact that the cooler is a joke if you plan on ocing. I wouldn't buy a b reference r9 290 either. Wouldn't get a reference and with a poor blower. Dual or triple slot cooler and the AIO cooler I may even try now too.
 

exar333

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2004
8,518
8
91
I'm sure they would. Doesn't change the fact that the cooler is a joke if you plan on ocing. I wouldn't buy a b reference r9 290 either. Wouldn't get a reference and with a poor blower. Dual or triple slot cooler and the AIO cooler I may even try now too.

That's true...they work fine if you don't mind a lot of volume.

That's my issue with the TX, is that custom cards aren't available. Seems silly to me...why not let the 'best' get an extreme, ridiculous version? Custom cards have done anything but give NV's products a bad name, exactly the opposite. Same for AMD too.
 
Last edited:

Grooveriding

Diamond Member
Dec 25, 2008
9,108
1,260
126
OK, so one pump, one reservoir but possibly two radiators. Does the size of the reservoir matter? Does it help cooling performance to have a large pool of liquid, or will it work just as well if you barely had enough to fill the loop and with only a small reservoir?
I'm excited about getting 2 or 300 more Mhz on the CPU, adding enough boost to the 980TI's to match or beat all the aftermarket cards and to do it all fairly quietly and looking sexy as hell to boot.

More or less won't matter. Only your radiators, fan speed and ambient temp will play a role. Maybe pump speed to a small degree.

Reservoir choice is mostly just an aesthetic one and you need the reservoir to lead into your pump because whatever air is left in your loop after filling it resides in the top of your reservoir.
 
Last edited:

exar333

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2004
8,518
8
91
Guru 3D's review was pretty interesting for the Gigabyte G1 Gaming 980Ti:

http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/gigabyte_geforce_gtx_980_ti_g1_gaming_soc_review,36.html

Overclock Results (from 'gaming presets' to max OC results)
13% core OC (1152mhz to 1302mhz)
19% boost OC (1241mhz to 1477mhz)
11% memory OC (7012mhz to 7818mhz)

This averaged to ~10% on the games at 1440P, so scaling was pretty solid if you look at the numbers. I wonder if this card is somewhat memory bandwidth limited? I wonder if that is holding it back somewhat for higher resolutions...

If you look at the 2013 Firestrike results, the max OC shows a score ~%22 higher than a 'stock' 980Ti. I would venture a guess that even better custom cards could likely get another 100mhz or so (based on what we saw for the 970/980) which would push the overall performance bump to ~30%.
 

exar333

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2004
8,518
8
91
Wow, over 20% more than a stock 980 TI. Scaling is amazing. Power consumption out of the box is barely over a stock 980 TI, too.

Yeah.

I would go out on a limb and say this OC likely would be pretty representative for someone overclocking a non-crazy custom card, with relatively acceptable fan levels. Of course, YMMV, but gives a good ballpark of what you could likely expect to see.
 

5150Joker

Diamond Member
Feb 6, 2002
5,559
0
71
www.techinferno.com
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/gigabyte_geforce_gtx_980_ti_g1_gaming_soc_review,25.html

GM200 is really held back by the reference blower. Look at the cut down GM200 demolishing Titan X!

It's not that simple. The cooler while adequate could be better but what holds back titan x and even 980 ti is the vbios limitations. I've removed them all completely for my cards and use them at 1450 mhz in every single game. Temps never exceed 82C while at that clock and this is with no fluctuations in core clock since i had boost removed.
 

bryanW1995

Lifer
May 22, 2007
11,144
32
91
OK fine. You guys convinced me.

::Water obsession mode activated::

I'm researching a new case and my first ever custom loop. Gonna cool this sucker DOWN. I want it all quiet though. Is that possible for water cooling? To get cool and quiet? Also, I wonder if my enermax revolution 1050watt will be enough with some added OC to cards and CPU. I won't be adding voltage to the GPUs though. I'm just not comfortable with that. I'll open them up as far as stock voltage allows though.

hahaha

Now I remember why I stopped coming around here so much...these mofos spent more of my money than my wife. Well, ok, not really, but still...the fact that it's even in the ballpark is pretty amazing.

GL on the water cooling, though I'm not sure that you'll need it if you're using 980ti.
 

iiiankiii

Senior member
Apr 4, 2008
759
47
91
It's not that simple. The cooler while adequate could be better but what holds back titan x and even 980 ti is the vbios limitations. I've removed them all completely for my cards and use them at 1450 mhz in every single game. Temps never exceed 82C while at that clock and this is with no fluctuations in core clock since i had boost removed.

Really? Overvolt and increased power limit on the stock blower? That's nuts. You better check the back of the card. That thing must be blazing hot. When I was running without a proper backplate, my infrared gun measured nearly 100c on the VRM and over 85c on the VRAM. Might want to be careful. Oh, the noise. I can't imagine how loud that thing is. I'm willing to bet it's over 50% on the fan curve. Probably around 60%.
 

exar333

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2004
8,518
8
91
Really? Overvolt and increased power limit on the stock blower? That's nuts. You better check the back of the card. That thing must be blazing hot. When I was running without a proper backplate, my infrared gun measured nearly 100c on the VRM and over 85c on the VRAM. Might want to be careful. Oh, the noise. I can't imagine how loud that thing is. I'm willing to bet it's over 50% on the fan curve. Probably around 60%.

Hey, its one reason to look forward to old age, right? Noise issues become less and less important.
 

guskline

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2006
5,338
476
126
moonbogg: I have a Thermaltake Core X-9 case and it has TONS of room for radiators. The "Cadillac" of water cooling cases are Caselabs but very expensive.

I would suggest a single loop for both your cpu and dual gpus. The EK Titan X full water blocks fit the GTX980TI and address BOTH gpu and VRM cooling.

A formula was given to me on this forum by one of the water cooling "gurus" BrightCandle, to calculate the amount of radiator space needed for standard 120 mm rads to cool enough to keep a 10 degree delta between the room temp and your actual loop temp with fans at @800 rpm. It requires you to calculate the toal wattage put out by your cpu and gpus.

120 mm rads spaces needed = total wattage / 130.

I used 250W for my 3930k @4.6Ghz and 300W per card for my R9 290s. If you overclock the gpus, that total wattage really jumps.

In your case, a 3930k @4.3Ghz is no more than 225 W and the 980TI is @250-275 per card. Lets be safe and say 275. 225+275+275=775/130=@ 6 rad spaces.

I clearly over radded my rig but did it because I had the room with the case I have (holds 2 480s in the roof and 1 480 to the side.
It helps though as I jumped to an 8 core/16 thread 5960x I had plenty of capacity.

My suggestion is buy the biggest case you can reasonable afford, both in price and space. It gives you plenty of room for both radiators, and pumps, and reservoirs.
 
Last edited:

Grooveriding

Diamond Member
Dec 25, 2008
9,108
1,260
126
moonbogg: I have a Thermaltake Core X-9 case and it has TONS of room for radiators. The "Cadillac" of water cooling cases are Caselabs but very expensive.

I would suggest a single loop for both your cpu and dual gpus. The EK Titan X full water blocks fit the GTX980TI and address BOTH gpu and VRM cooling.

A formula was given to me on this forum by one of the water cooling "gurus" BrightCandle, to calculate the amount of radiator space needed for standard 120 mm rads to cool enough to keep a 10 degree delta between the room temp and your actual loop temp with fans at @800 rpm. It requires you to calculate the toal wattage put out by your cpu and gpus.

120 mm rads spaces needed = total wattage / 130.

I used 250W for my 3930k @4.6Ghz and 300W per card for my R9 290s. If you overclock the gpus, that total wattage really jumps.

In your case, a 3930k @4.3Ghz is no more than 225 W and the 980TI is @250-275 per card. Lets be safe and say 275. 225+275+275=775/130=@ 6 rad spaces.

I clearly over radded my rig but did it because I had the room with the case I have (holds 2 480s in the roof and 1 480 to the side.
It helps though as I jumped to an 8 core/16 thread 5960x I had plenty of capacity.

My suggestion is buy the biggest case you can reasonable afford, both in price and space. It gives you plenty of room for both radiators, and pumps, and reservoirs.


This is good advice. While I really like the look of a water cooled setup in a smaller case, it takes a lot of effort - or using acrylic tube, to really get it all in there neatly.

I use a 900D and space/tube runs are never an issue. The case is too big really and I'd rather something smaller, but it's easier to work with.
 

exar333

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2004
8,518
8
91
This is good advice. While I really like the look of a water cooled setup in a smaller case, it takes a lot of effort - or using acrylic tube, to really get it all in there neatly.

I use a 900D and space/tube runs are never an issue. The case is too big really and I'd rather something smaller, but it's easier to work with.

I can attest to that. The 350D is a great case, but it gets awfully cramped....another reason I would rather avoid SLI/CF if possible. 2xGPU boards (like a Fiji '295x2') with HBM could be FANTASTIC for these smaller builds, especially on water.
 

RussianSensation

Elite Member
Sep 5, 2003
19,458
765
126
It's not that simple. The cooler while adequate could be better but what holds back titan x and even 980 ti is the vbios limitations. I've removed them all completely for my cards and use them at 1450 mhz in every single game. Temps never exceed 82C while at that clock and this is with no fluctuations in core clock since i had boost removed.

1450mhz clocks on a reference TX at 82C cannot be quiet. 2 of those is a jet engine I am sure.

Now, just 3 months later after-market 980Tis are cleaning up the reference Titan X, running cooler, quieter, can turn the fans off up to 60*C (that Gigabyte G1 can), have better circuitry (8 power phases), while priced $300+ less than a reference TX. Something many of us brought up during TX launch that after-market 980Tis would make TX obsolete - this moment is now. The TX basically needs a $100 water-block just to beat an after-market 980Ti Gigabyte G1 by 5-6% when max overclocked. That means $400 premium per each card with TX water-cooled just to get 5% more performance in SLI over 980Ti after-market SLI that boosts to 1477mhz. Considering a reference TX OC is as loud as a reference 290X, and costs $2000 in SLI, that's simply unacceptable. Gigabyte doesn't even make the quietest cards either. Once MSI Gaming drops, it's going to be laughable to defend the noise levels of a reference blower GM200 card.

This is far worse than OG Titan -> 780. At least once max overclocked the OG Titan had a bigger lead over a max overclocked 780, and back then 3GB of VRAM could be exceeded with mods, plus OG Titan's resale value held rather well. This time the TX is a waste of $, period. 6GB of VRAM is plenty unless one is gaming on 4x TXs at 5K (or similar) while TX has no DP performance so its resale value will bomb.

Wow, over 20% more than a stock 980 TI. Scaling is amazing. Power consumption out of the box is barely over a stock 980 TI, too.

After-market 980TI is seriously impressive. Even manages to make 980Ti SLI look bad.





980Ti is mopping the floor with OG Titan, 780Ti, 980, 290X. That's 'only' at 1291mhz boost, not the 1477mhz boost they get in the overclocking section. 980 at $499 looks hopelessly overpriced now against a $270 R9 290X or the 980Ti after-market cards.



I've never seen such a massive performance difference between NV's 2nd tier lineup (980) and 1st tier (980Ti). Usually the performance is far closer like 6800GT vs. 6800U or GTX570 vs. 580. 980 isn't even in the same league as a 980Ti in GPU limited scenarios.

Waiting for some professional site to do a review of 980Ti vs. 980 both at 1.45-1.5Ghz clocks. I expect the former to win by 35-40%.

hahaha

Now I remember why I stopped coming around here so much...these mofos spent more of my money than my wife.

You can live through their purchases vicariously and feel good that you didn't waste your own money on TXs Imagine spending $2000 on Titan X SLI that are beaten by cooler, quieter and better built $1400 after-market 980Tis and all that took just 3 months.
 
Last edited:

xthetenth

Golden Member
Oct 14, 2014
1,800
529
106
I can attest to that. The 350D is a great case, but it gets awfully cramped....another reason I would rather avoid SLI/CF if possible. 2xGPU boards (like a Fiji '295x2') with HBM could be FANTASTIC for these smaller builds, especially on water.

I'm looking at that Phanteks Enthoo Evolv on AT's coverage of Computex with room for two 140s or 120s up top and wondering if that could fit a pair of Furies.
 

JoeRambo

Golden Member
Jun 13, 2013
1,814
2,105
136
Waiting for some professional site to do a review of 980Ti vs. 980 both at 1.45-1.5Ghz clocks. I expect the former to win by 35-40%.


Why it wouldn't be that way? 980TI has almost ~1.45x more resources than 980. Everything is scaled, ROPs, TMUs, mem, L2 cache, memory bw, shaders. Tests show pretty much linear scaling, so it ends up in clocking contest.

I'll repeat it again - 1400Mhz GM200 and GM204 is big nemesis of AMD, air OC extracting extra 25% of perf out of these cores is going to have disastrous results on AMD lineup.
 

5150Joker

Diamond Member
Feb 6, 2002
5,559
0
71
www.techinferno.com
Why it wouldn't be that way? 980TI has almost ~1.45x more resources than 980. Everything is scaled, ROPs, TMUs, mem, L2 cache, memory bw, shaders. Tests show pretty much linear scaling, so it ends up in clocking contest.

I'll repeat it again - 1400Mhz GM200 and GM204 is big nemesis of AMD, air OC extracting extra 25% of perf out of these cores is going to have disastrous results on AMD lineup.

AMD is a nonfactor in the high end gpu market these days. Since the release of Maxwell they've had nothing to respond with and even their overhyped fiji seems like it will under deliver with limited quantities. Besides a lot of the people who love AMD hardware tend to sit on the sidelines and write paragraphs about it while living vicariously through others. That certainly must be terrible for AMDs bottomline.. What they desperately need are high spending nvidia fans but it seems they can't deliver.

Really? Overvolt and increased power limit on the stock blower? That's nuts. You better check the back of the card. That thing must be blazing hot. When I was running without a proper backplate, my infrared gun measured nearly 100c on the VRM and over 85c on the VRAM. Might want to be careful. Oh, the noise. I can't imagine how loud that thing is. I'm willing to bet it's over 50% on the fan curve. Probably around 60%.

Maybe, haven't used an IR gun to see but I might do that at some point. I've got cool air blowing over both cards and my home thermostat is set at 75F so it stays pretty cool most of the day. I don't really notice the noise much since I game with wireless headphones but without them on it does get a little loud.
 
Last edited:

Aikouka

Lifer
Nov 27, 2001
30,383
912
126
Does the size of the reservoir matter? Does it help cooling performance to have a large pool of liquid, or will it work just as well if you barely had enough to fill the loop and with only a small reservoir?

Reservoirs actually aren't even required in water cooling builds. Their only practical use is that it helps make filling your loop a lot easier. To fill one, you put a bunch of (distilled) water into the reservoir, turn the pump on, let it pull the water down until it's almost all gone from the reservoir, turn the pump off, and repeat until the reservoir no longer fully drains. Note that if any components are higher than the reservoir, water will spill back into the reservoir when the pumps shut down. So, don't fill it to the brim while it's running, or you may have issues ever opening your fill port with the system off (water will spill out).

You can do all of this with an opening along your tubing -- the most common being a T-line. Although, it can be hard to see the position of the water if you have colored tubing.

I use a 900D and space/tube runs are never an issue. The case is too big really and I'd rather something smaller, but it's easier to work with.

In large cases, you tend to run into the opposite problem... too much tubing. It doesn't really cause that much of an issue, but generally, the "rule" of water cooling is to try to be efficient with your tubing. Running from the top to the bottom of the 900D is about 25".

I own a 900D and I've built a custom loop in it. It's not too bad, but if you go for a freestanding pump, you're going to learn the hard way that the case doesn't really have a good spot for one (its predecessor, the 800D, had a shelf separating the PSU and MOBO areas). I originally built a shelf for mine, but it caused a lot of hassle when accessing the 240mm radiator below. So, I removed the 240mm radiator (there was a 480mm on the other side anyway), and moved the pumps (Dual EK D5 top) to the bottom. In retrospection, I would've preferred a Dual D5 bay reservoir/top or a combined tube reservoir + top setup. The 900D's extra set of grommets (for EATX) are nice because I used those for mounting my tube reservoir, which meant I didn't have to drill holes.

Although, while the 900D can fit some serious hardware, I find that my case has some serious quality control problems. It suffers from some annoying vibration problems on the HDD cage, the bottom, window-side door won't close properly, my drive trays came rusted (unacceptable on a brand new product), and the bottom fan filters sometimes come unstuck and get pulled into the fans.
 
Last edited:

exar333

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2004
8,518
8
91
I'm looking at that Phanteks Enthoo Evolv on AT's coverage of Computex with room for two 140s or 120s up top and wondering if that could fit a pair of Furies.

I don't see why not. Card length shouldn't be an issue and the top of the case would be ideal for either the WCE fan/rad combos (x2) or a nice thick rad from a custom loop. The challenge with a custom loop would to maintain good case airflow. It is definitely doable. Case looks nice...
 

Grooveriding

Diamond Member
Dec 25, 2008
9,108
1,260
126
I have a 480 rad in the top, another 480 rad at the bottom and I modded the front dual 120 fan mount to accommodate a 240 rad. I have very little tubing apart from at the base of the case, where the tubing leads off an extension I have from the bottom gpu, across the floor of the case to the bottom rad. I use a small tube reservoir mounted besides the motherboard that has the pump attached to it at the base.

I agree the 900D is a step down in quality from the 800D. My side panel with the window is a pain to get off as the mounting is a little off and the small bottom doors for the fans on either side take some wiggling to get on right.

It's a better layout and look than the 800D, but they cheaped out on some stuff.
 

moonbogg

Lifer
Jan 8, 2011
10,637
3,095
136
moonbogg: I have a Thermaltake Core X-9 case and it has TONS of room for radiators. The "Cadillac" of water cooling cases are Caselabs but very expensive.

I would suggest a single loop for both your cpu and dual gpus. The EK Titan X full water blocks fit the GTX980TI and address BOTH gpu and VRM cooling.

A formula was given to me on this forum by one of the water cooling "gurus" BrightCandle, to calculate the amount of radiator space needed for standard 120 mm rads to cool enough to keep a 10 degree delta between the room temp and your actual loop temp with fans at @800 rpm. It requires you to calculate the toal wattage put out by your cpu and gpus.

120 mm rads spaces needed = total wattage / 130.

I used 250W for my 3930k @4.6Ghz and 300W per card for my R9 290s. If you overclock the gpus, that total wattage really jumps.

In your case, a 3930k @4.3Ghz is no more than 225 W and the 980TI is @250-275 per card. Lets be safe and say 275. 225+275+275=775/130=@ 6 rad spaces.

I clearly over radded my rig but did it because I had the room with the case I have (holds 2 480s in the roof and 1 480 to the side.
It helps though as I jumped to an 8 core/16 thread 5960x I had plenty of capacity.

My suggestion is buy the biggest case you can reasonable afford, both in price and space. It gives you plenty of room for both radiators, and pumps, and reservoirs.

Hmm, I think my 1050watt should be alright I suppose. I know it will work, but it might only have 2-300 watts of overhead. I guess I could use it until it breaks. Without adding voltage to the GPUs, I'll probably be OK. Good post BTW. Thanks for the info. I like the idea of over radding as well. It gives the option for low RPM on the fans I think. Maybe I'll get crazy and go for 1500 on those 980ti's :twisted:
 

sakete

Member
Apr 22, 2015
107
1
76
So at stock speeds running an EVGA 980Ti SC+ ACX2.0+ on a Furmark stress test, it started throttling speeds once I reached 88C. And I reached 88C pretty quickly, with ambient temps of around 27C. Is that normal behavior?
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |