GTX700 series reviews thread

Page 9 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

VulgarDisplay

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2009
6,193
2
76
Like most of the reviews say, the gtx780 is only compelling for people on gtx5xx and hd 6xxx cards. I think it's a bit too expensive even for them, but I'm sure people will still buy it.

Anyone with a gtx680 or 7970 would be nuts to pay $650 for this card if you ask me.
 

ocre

Golden Member
Dec 26, 2008
1,594
7
81
everyone please read this, Again if you have to
Maybe they should but, and when you read this remember that this is speculation on the Finance and Marketing crew of Nvidia.

They most likely believed that by dropping the price from $1000 to $750, they wouldn't sell too many more cards. This is called Price Elasticity, I'll give an example real quick:

At $1000, they believed they'd sell maybe 10,000 cards. $10,000,000 revenue.
At $750 they believed they'd sell maybe 9,000 cards. $6,750,000 revenue.

Price Elasticity is (Change in Price)/(Change in Demand).
From wikipedia "Some luxury products have been claimed to be examples of Veblen goods, with a negative price elasticity of demand: for example, making a perfume more expensive can increase its perceived value as a luxury good to such an extent that sales can go up, rather than down." - I won't say this is the case for Titan at all, and I do believe raising the price decreased demand, but I believe that it's Price Elasticity was VERY low meaning raising the price decreased demand by not too much allowing them to reap more revenue. Once you hit ranges where products are considered "luxury" or "premium" changes in price have a much lower hit on demand. In contrast, if a mid range product of AMD or Nvidia changed even $20 dollars, we'd all change our recommendations immediately. A $20 dollar jump in titan's price though, and it really wouldn't matter.


Hope that helps.
there is a set amount of chips ready to be unleashed. a number that has bee crunched in millions of ways.

Is their anyone here who hasnt noticed that nvidia actually knows what they are doing? That they are very successful in the most hostile economic environments? Does anyone think this is by accident? seriously?

They already figured how many they have, how much they need to sell, and what they will get out of them. Nvidia cannot be successful by accident, not quarter after quarter/year over year. They are good at what they do.

it only makes sense that titan has sold at least to their expectations. If not they would have dropped the price and we wouldnt have an expensive 780. Its much more logical that their is a specific amount of chips they have and the price is calculated by that. Its when the stock doesnt move prices drop and projected earnings are adjusted.

I see way to many complaints. why? If this card is priced too high for you, their are tons of other options in your price range. If your mad cause you want new options, there is still several more 700 series cards coming out. I bet everyone of them will be cheaper. I also bet that prices will come down over time like they always do.
 
Last edited:

aigomorla

CPU, Cases&Cooling Mod PC Gaming Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 28, 2005
20,879
3,230
126
errr 650 dollars each card just killed it for me.

And thats without markup.

Factor in another 150 for waterblocks... im looking at 800 dollar per card.
And factor again that i always scale my cards... 1600 dollars in gpu does not make sense to me when 75% of the games im playing are still dx9.

*sigh*

i was really hopping to hit arround a 500-550 dollar mark, which would put it at 700 dollars per card and a 1400 dollar total package.

1600 dollars is just rediculous in my eyes unless i did bitcoin mining.

Like most of the reviews say, the gtx780 is only compelling for people on gtx5xx and hd 6xxx cards. I think it's a bit too expensive even for them, but I'm sure people will still buy it.

Anyone with a gtx680 or 7970 would be nuts to pay $650 for this card if you ask me.

no its still too high for people with gtx5xx series...
To me it really feels like nvidia is telling gamers to go with ATi, as they will completely dominate the bitcoin area.
Realistically.. the only way you'd buy this card is..

1. If you really had too much money.
2. You had monster displays and the titan was just a bit too expensive.
3. You had enough bitcoin credits to pay for half of the card.

Otherwise... ATI is looking more and more delicious, especially since more games should come out optimized for AMD from console ports.


Sigh...
 
Last edited:

Fx1

Golden Member
Aug 22, 2012
1,215
5
81
everyone please read this, Again if you have to


Is their anyone here who hasnt noticed that nvidia actually knows what they are doing? That they are very successful in the most hostile economic environments? Does anyone think this is by accident? seriously?

They already figured how many they have, how much they need to sell, and what they will get out of them. Nvidia cannot be successful by accident, not quarter after quarter/year over year. They are good at what they do.

it only makes sense that titan has sold at least to their expectations. If not they would have dropped the price and we wouldnt have an expensive 780. Its much more logical that their is a specific amount of chips they have and the price is calculated by that. Its when the stock doesnt move prices drop and projected earnings are adjusted.

I see way to many complaints. why? If this card is priced too high for you, their are tons of other options in your price range. If your mad cause you want new options, there is still several more 700 series cards coming out. I bet everyone of them will be cheaper. I also bet that prices will come down over time like they always do.

550mm2 of silicon seems to cost a heck of alot more today than it did in the past. Especially if you buy it from Nvidia.

Its all marketing and clever pricing to manipulate their customers.

Mars do the same. Have you ever wondered why a Mars bar costs 50% more but is 25% smaller than it was 5 years ago.
 
Dec 5, 2011
28
0
66
I see way to many complaints. why? If this card is priced too high for you, their are tons of other options in your price range. If your mad cause you want new options, there is still several more 700 series cards coming out. I bet everyone of them will be cheaper. I also bet that prices will come down over time like they always do.

People are complaining because they want the card but they don't find value in the pricing. If the price was $200, the price would be really low in the eyes of most people, and people would be talking about what a phenominal value it is. What is the difference? We are discussing the price. If you don't include what you think about the price, what are we discussing then? The thread would be three posts long.
 

wand3r3r

Diamond Member
May 16, 2008
3,180
0
0
People are complaining because they want the card but they don't find value in the pricing. If the price was $200, the price would be really low in the eyes of most people, and people would be talking about what a phenominal value it is. What is the difference? We are discussing the price. If you don't include what you think about the price, what are we discussing then? The thread would be three posts long.

Excellent point, you hit the nail on the head.

The card is good, the price sucks. Naturally certain people are pushing hard to suppress any dissent but if it were a great value they'd be pushing that left and right.
 

Face2Face

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2001
4,100
215
106
I think the Gigabyte Windforce card @ $649 is a good price if you consider how well it overclocks and the possibility of even higher overclocks with Bios Mod = 1200Mhz +

it's $649 for Titan performance out of the box. Now I know that still a lot of $$$, but damn.
 
Last edited:

Fx1

Golden Member
Aug 22, 2012
1,215
5
81
I think the Gigabyte Windforce card @ $649 is a good price if you consider how well it overclocks and the possibility of even higher overclocks with Bios Mod.

it's $649 for Titan performance out of the box. Now I know that still a lot of $$$, but damn.

Making people think a $650 780 GTX is good value because Titan is $1000 is Nvidia marketing at its best.

There is no way people would accept the price of the 780 GTX without the Titan.

Consumers generally fail to see through this.
 

Face2Face

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2001
4,100
215
106
Making people think a $650 780 GTX is good value because Titan is $1000 is Nvidia marketing at its best.

There is no way people would accept the price of the 780 GTX without the Titan.

Consumers generally fail to see through this.

I understand your logic. But prices are what they are , you can't do anything about it. The only thing you can do is decide what fits your budget and your needs. I wish AMD had an answer to this card...
 
Last edited:

Fx1

Golden Member
Aug 22, 2012
1,215
5
81
I understand your logic. But prices are what they are , you can't do anything about it. The only thing you can do is decide what fits your budget and your needs.

You can do something about it actually.

1) Not buy it.

2) Help others make informed choices which affect the sales of the overpriced cards thus hurting sales.

I often read the comments on product reviews and often there is a general consensus on those comments and that affects your view of those products. especially if you are on the fence. You will never change a die hard fans view but there is a large number who are undecided.
 

BallaTheFeared

Diamond Member
Nov 15, 2010
8,115
0
71
At the same time the performance of the GTX 780 is high enough that AMD can’t directly compete with the card, leaving NVIDIA without competition and free to set prices as they would like, and this is exactly what they have done.

Me too, but the truth is AMD can't compete on 28nm high end, they have no answer for GK110 currently, and probably likely won't until next gen.

People are paying $450 for your run of the mill mid-range GHz card, but can't justify the GTX 780... They'll say you're buying into Nvidia's marketing while having already bought into a 100% price hike on their mid-range card.

Perspective. Mid-range GHz/680 for $500 is ok, but $650 for a card that should cost double what the $250 (now $500) cards cost is too much? I think not, but that doesn't mean I wouldn't like lower prices... But honestly 1K was the doubling, $650 is a godsend for extreme high end users in this current market.
 
Last edited:

Krolic

Junior Member
Mar 22, 2012
3
0
0
I wouldn't mind some input from some of the GPU enthusiasts in this thread.

I'm putting together a new computer and would like it to last a solid 3-4 years before having to upgrade anything or just build a new comp. This would be primarily a gaming computer at 1080p(although 1440p is a possibility in a couple years), and I'm looking at both the 780 and the 7970.

I understand the 780 isn't the greatest price/perf., but to last 4 years or so, would it be worth it to shell out the extra $$$? Suggestions?
 

Skurge

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2009
5,195
1
71
$599 would have been nice... a slight premium for a noticeable performance jump. It would have walked the line between too much and just right. But $649, IMO, is just too high. Hopefully 20nm prices won't come out of the gate this high, otherwise peace out PC gaming.

Yeah, I was hoping this would be $550-599 I would have gotten one. I'll probably get a 7970. Or I might just skip this gen, although I don't see next gen being any better since people are buying into these really high prices.

In the AT review, the 7970 isn't that far behind the 780 at 1440p
 
Last edited:

amenx

Diamond Member
Dec 17, 2004
4,007
2,277
136
I dont think Nvidia could have priced it any differently with it being much closer to the Titan in performance vs the 680. Any lower in price may have been a slap in all Titan owners faces. And judging by how well the Titan has done, it would also have been a poor marketing decision if price was lower. Nvidia is also keenly aware that any card faster than the competition would automatically grant it a much higher desirability factor, and to hell with value. So as a business, they had to do what they did with the pricing. Personally I would never buy a card over $500, but I can appreciate the high end market niche this product fits in.
 
Last edited:

Grooveriding

Diamond Member
Dec 25, 2008
9,108
1,260
126
I wouldn't mind some input from some of the GPU enthusiasts in this thread.

I'm putting together a new computer and would like it to last a solid 3-4 years before having to upgrade anything or just build a new comp. This would be primarily a gaming computer at 1080p(although 1440p is a possibility in a couple years), and I'm looking at both the 780 and the 7970.

I understand the 780 isn't the greatest price/perf., but to last 4 years or so, would it be worth it to shell out the extra $$$? Suggestions?

Trying to get longevity out of video cards is a lot harder than CPUs. Video cards improve much faster than CPUs do and have more of an affect on your gaming.

It depends if you are willing to compromise on settings as time goes by or not. GTX780 is $250 more than the 7970 and 20% faster, do you think that 20% is going to help you get further through your four year mark ?

If you're looking for longevity out of a gaming system, usually it's better to buy the best price/perf card now and then buy the best price/perf card in another 2 years from now. You'll end up spending the same amount you would for one $650 card today, but get more performance long term from buying two $300 cards spaced out in the four year span.
 

Face2Face

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2001
4,100
215
106
You can do something about it actually.

1) Not buy it. Agreed

2) Help others make informed choices which affect the sales of the overpriced cards thus hurting sales. This would work, but I don't think it would be very easy at all and even enough to stop the higher prices. The GTX 780 is priced so high because there is no competition from the red team. Stock for stock it's not worth the $200 asking price over the 7970 GE. Overclocked and modded I think it is... just my opinion.

^_^
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,095
513
126
I wouldn't mind some input from some of the GPU enthusiasts in this thread.

I'm putting together a new computer and would like it to last a solid 3-4 years before having to upgrade anything or just build a new comp. This would be primarily a gaming computer at 1080p(although 1440p is a possibility in a couple years), and I'm looking at both the 780 and the 7970.

I understand the 780 isn't the greatest price/perf., but to last 4 years or so, would it be worth it to shell out the extra $$$? Suggestions?

Not sure if you can build a future proof machine for that kind of duration. My i5 2500K + GTX 470 is still doing fine. But I also dont play the most demanding games(World of Tanks, Warthunder, Company of Heroes).

If my computer was going through the ringer games like Crysis 2, Farcry 3, ect. It would melt.
 

Nintendesert

Diamond Member
Mar 28, 2010
7,761
5
0
Wtf kind of freakonomics is this? How does demand drop when the price is lower lol?

OT: Well, I'll be waiting on 20nm, this card would be much more interesting at $500-$550.




You could try reading the rest of his post since he explains it in his post.
 

wand3r3r

Diamond Member
May 16, 2008
3,180
0
0
I wouldn't mind some input from some of the GPU enthusiasts in this thread.

I'm putting together a new computer and would like it to last a solid 3-4 years before having to upgrade anything or just build a new comp. This would be primarily a gaming computer at 1080p(although 1440p is a possibility in a couple years), and I'm looking at both the 780 and the 7970.

I understand the 780 isn't the greatest price/perf., but to last 4 years or so, would it be worth it to shell out the extra $$$? Suggestions?

It's going to be hardly noticeable in a few years, the 20% difference won't make or break games. The value of cards is generally minimal in ~2 years.

There's no way it'd be worth the massive premium with such a small difference.

I'd go with a ~$300 7950 that can be volt adjusted and save the $350 for a halfway upgrade in 3 years. It's one of the better bangs for the buck and generally overclocks well.

If you really want to spend over $300 go for the MSI twin frozr 7970 with 1050 core for $400. I'd still go 7950 and bump up the clocks over that.

The CPU will outlast the gpu.
 
Last edited:

blastingcap

Diamond Member
Sep 16, 2010
6,654
5
76
Trying to get longevity out of video cards is a lot harder than CPUs. Video cards improve much faster than CPUs do and have more of an affect on your gaming.

It depends if you are willing to compromise on settings as time goes by or not. GTX780 is $250 more than the 7970 and 20% faster, do you think that 20% is going to help you get further through your four year mark ?

If you're looking for longevity out of a gaming system, usually it's better to buy the best price/perf card now and then buy the best price/perf card in another 2 years from now. You'll end up spending the same amount you would for one $650 card today, but get more performance long term from buying two $300 cards spaced out in the four year span.

This.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |