Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Originally posted by: rchiu
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Originally posted by: rchiu
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Originally posted by: Fern
I think this whole theoretical discussion about the Fed and the US gov being against Ron Paul etc all misses the real point so completely.
Look, especially you R Paul people - these guys are scammers just trying to take advantage of you and your candidate. They are apparently using Paul's image without permission to seel their "product".
His anti-fed ideas, and you zeal for his candidacy make you easy marks for their con.
FBI remarks: (
link )
It also calls the organization a ?multi-level marketing scheme,? saying that distributors make an average profit of $4.66 off every coin, as the amount of silver contained within a $20 Liberty Dollar is valued at $15.34. The affidavit notes this as part of the grounds for its charges of mail and wire fraud, as the Liberty Dollar?s distributors claim that it is ?100 percent backed? by gold and silver.
?The only parties in the process who deal with the ALD [Liberty Dollar] at face value
You do know that they were busted the very day they started shipping their unathorized Ron Paul $20 coins.
These people are not ideological compatriots, they are scammers targeting RP supporters.
Fern
If what they were doing is against the law then they should be brought to justice. I just don't see that happening. Why not enforce the law all the way around then? Shouldn't the FED be getting raided as well? Seeing as how "Gold & Silver is to be used to pay all debts" is not being done by the FED. It's clearly biased, enforce only the laws that support the agenda of the few, the powerful, the FED.
what part of multi-level marketing scheme and profit of $4.66 off $20 coin don't you understand? Please educate us based on your infinite wisdom on how the Fed is profiting from issuing the dollar and to whom those profit goes to? If you love 1800 so much and wanna live by the rule made up that time, there are plenty of third world countries you can go to. Here we just moved into 21st century and prefer to live by rules fit to the economy reality today.
If you don't like the laws of this land MOVE. This country believe it or not was founded and politicians are sworn to uphold the Constitution the moment they take office. Yet when this is pointed out, you and others disregard it because it doesn't suit your agenda. Get with the law. Agenda based law is fascist. You would be better served in that third world country you speak of. by all means, if you don't like the law either 1) leave 2) change it.
Simple question. How big is the US economy today? How much gold/silver does it take to backup a currency to support the US economy today? What is the total supply of gold/silver in the world today? When you figure out these question, you'd see the idea you support is just a fantasy.
Exactly the reason why they wrote gold & silver into the Constitution. To keep governments from overspending. But
again you ignore the law to support your agenda. The economy is overspent, over taxed, over inflated far beyond what it was meant to be. Gold & Silver to pay dents was there to curb spending, preserve a solid backing and to have a more stable currency.
Do you know that it was to prevent overspending? Overspending on what? Do you realize that one of the reasons why they added it was to prevent governments from preventing the free flow of goods and commerce?
However, the problem with denominating and transacting pegged to a commodity is that your currency is forever tied to that currency. THus, if gold goes up in price your currency has to devalue to maintain the same value relative to other currencies. If it does not, that means your currency also becomes worth more (when it really isn't) which deflates the value of your currency. You see, because you are tied to an inflating currency your currency must deflate in relative terms to keep on parity with all other qorld currencies tied to the commodity. What would happen if the commodity declines in price? Then your currency is worth less while goods are not, thus your currency inflates in price.
So essentially, you are tied to the whims of a commodity. As we see from oil, commodities go up and down in price, prone to speculation, new discoveries, strangleholds on supply, cartels, manufacturing problems...etc. When economies were small and not that many large groups of people were mobile and modernizing it wasn't a problem. Furthermore, when industrial uses and civilian uses were small, it wasn't a problem.
However, eventually that will go away. Supply problems with begin to cause problems. Addtionally, since there is a finite supply of gold but an infinite supply of economic growth and economic value (wealth accumulated) then you will eventually have to deflate your currency. In addition, since economies fluctuate, the demand of gold does also, this could lead to sharp volatility.
As shown above, the total amount of gold in circulation equates roughly to the amount of US currency in circulation. That means, in order to put all currencies to gold at the current price, you'd need ~5x the amount of gold currently in circulation. That doesn't even include the amount of gold in private hands. Every government in the world would need to confiscate all gold.
if not, then you would see gold purchased, en masse, by governments, driving up prices and driving out manufacturing, consumers, and goods and services. Essentially, moving to the gold standard would destroy the market for gold.
Sure, one could limit the amount of currency in circulation. However, what then about the fact that the wealth created in a growing economy and population, needs to be backed by something? It *HAS* to have money to transact and gold to keep. Otherwise it will become more rare, appreciate with gold, and cause rampant deflation (or inflation in the case of different effects).
It's laughable that *anybody* thinks that the amount of currency in circulation is strictly dictated by the amount of debt. Consider that the amount of debt is 9tr and the amount of currency is 7tr, how does that work? No, the amount of currency in circulation is dictated not just by debt, but also by wealth and accumulation of such, along with population growth.
If a currency is not allowed to float, it will eventually move to monopolize *all* gold, causing massive price appreciation and eventual economic collapse. It's simple economics and truth, ignorance of such is plethoric among some people here.