- Oct 30, 2000
- 42,589
- 5
- 0
He should rot in prison. I don't beleive that the death penalty does any good. Nobody should kill anybody. Besides, death is too easy on the prisoner. Wouldn't a long, miserable life mopping the floor and making license plates be worse than death?
Originally posted by: brxndxn
He should rot in prison. I don't beleive that the death penalty does any good. Nobody should kill anybody. Besides, death is too easy on the prisoner. Wouldn't a long, miserable life mopping the floor and making license plates be worse than death?
Paying a person $30,000 a year to annoy him would also probably be worse than death. But, it is too expensive. Just fry the bastard. It's cheaper. I want my money to go towards schools, roads, and police. I don't want to pay for a rapists' food for the next 40 years.
Originally posted by: brxndxn
Paying a person $30,000 a year to annoy him would also probably be worse than death. But, it is too expensive. Just fry the bastard. It's cheaper. I want my money to go towards schools, roads, and police. I don't want to pay for a rapists' food for the next 40 years.He should rot in prison. I don't beleive that the death penalty does any good. Nobody should kill anybody. Besides, death is too easy on the prisoner. Wouldn't a long, miserable life mopping the floor and making license plates be worse than death?
THE FINANCIAL COSTS OF THE DEATH PENALTY
Death penalty cases are much more expensive than other criminal cases and cost more than imprisonment for life with no possibility of parole. In California, capital trials are six times more costly than other murder trials. A study in Kansas indicated that a capital trial costs $116,700 <I>more</I> than an ordinary murder trial.Complex pre-trial motions, lengthy jury selections, and expenses for expert witnesses are all likely to add to the costs in death penalty cases. The irreversibility of the death sentence requires courts to follow heightened due process in the preparation and course of the trial. The separate sentencing phase of the trial can take even longer than the guilt or innocence phase of the trial. And defendants are much more likely to insist on a trial when they are facing a possible death sentence. After conviction, there are constitutionally mandated appeals which involve both prosecution and defense costs.
Originally posted by: sandorski
I'm anti death penalty, so I disagree with execution, but what GWS has to do with his defence for this crime eludes me.
Originally posted by: rawoutput
Originally posted by: sandorski
I'm anti death penalty, so I disagree with execution, but what GWS has to do with his defence for this crime eludes me.
The president can overturn execution orders.
Originally posted by: 40oz
Originally posted by: brxndxn
Paying a person $30,000 a year to annoy him would also probably be worse than death. But, it is too expensive. Just fry the bastard. It's cheaper. I want my money to go towards schools, roads, and police. I don't want to pay for a rapists' food for the next 40 years.He should rot in prison. I don't beleive that the death penalty does any good. Nobody should kill anybody. Besides, death is too easy on the prisoner. Wouldn't a long, miserable life mopping the floor and making license plates be worse than death?
I would disagree-- It is not cheaper to sentence someone to death than it is to keep them in prison for the life
Here is some info I found----
<STRONG><a class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/dpic.r08.html" target=blank>THE FINANCIAL COSTS OF THE DEATH PENALTY</A></STRONG>
Death penalty cases are much more expensive than other criminal cases and cost more than imprisonment for life with no possibility of parole. In California, capital trials are six times more costly than other murder trials. A study in Kansas indicated that a capital trial costs $116,700 <I>more</I> than an ordinary murder trial.Complex pre-trial motions, lengthy jury selections, and expenses for expert witnesses are all likely to add to the costs in death penalty cases. The irreversibility of the death sentence requires courts to follow heightened due process in the preparation and course of the trial. The separate sentencing phase of the trial can take even longer than the guilt or innocence phase of the trial. And defendants are much more likely to insist on a trial when they are facing a possible death sentence. After conviction, there are constitutionally mandated appeals which involve both prosecution and defense costs.