Gunowners - would you "give up" your guns under federal law?

xj0hnx

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2007
9,262
3
76
No, but that's because they were all lost in a boating accident. Pops told me it was a bad idea to take AK's, AR's and MAC10 and a couple pistols boating, but I never listen.
 

chihlidog

Senior member
Apr 12, 2011
884
1
81
If it came down to that, I would resist. With arms. I hate to think about it, but yes they would indeed have to kill me.
 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
No.

Unless they go through the process to create an amendment to the constitution, the law will be unconstitutional and be rightfully judged so.

Why "give up" something when you just have to wait out the judicial system?
 

corwin

Diamond Member
Jan 13, 2006
8,644
9
81
I lost them all in a flood...who would have thought they could float away:\
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
No, but that's because they were all lost in a boating accident. Pops told me it was a bad idea to take AK's, AR's and MAC10 and a couple pistols boating, but I never listen.

odd. same thing happened. they need to some laws about boat's they are deadly.



the govenment would have to start searching homes for weapons to seize them. this i gurentee is going to lead to more deaths then we have from guns now.
 

irishScott

Lifer
Oct 10, 2006
21,562
3
0
No, but that's because they were all lost in a boating accident. Pops told me it was a bad idea to take AK's, AR's and MAC10 and a couple pistols boating, but I never listen.

This. Funny how that works out.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
66
91
This poll is silly in that there is no reason whatsoever to believe the federal government would or could (at least in the foreseeable future) pass legislation calling for a turn-in. It seems to me this poll is just a dog whistle to get people to pull out their e-peens and declare that they will fend off the feds with a hail of bullets (particularly in light of the "No, over my dead body" option). Unsurprisingly, mission accomplished.
 

sigurros81

Platinum Member
Nov 30, 2010
2,371
0
0
This poll is silly in that there is no reason whatsoever to believe the federal government would or could (at least in the foreseeable future) pass legislation calling for a turn-in. It seems to me this poll is just a dog whistle to get people to pull out their e-peens and declare that they will fend off the feds with a hail of bullets (particularly in light of the "No, over my dead body" option). Unsurprisingly, mission accomplished.

I highly doubt a single of these guys would actually die with their firearms in their hands. If anything they'll be wetting their panties the moment ATF breaks down their doors--hypothetical of course....
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
I highly doubt a single of these guys would actually die with their firearms in their hands. If anything they'll be wetting their panties the moment ATF breaks down their doors--hypothetical of course....

Correction, Sandeagles dog will wet itself when the ATF comes looking for our guns.
 
Sep 7, 2009
12,960
3
0
This poll is silly in that there is no reason whatsoever to believe the federal government would or could (at least in the foreseeable future) pass legislation calling for a turn-in. It seems to me this poll is just a dog whistle to get people to pull out their e-peens and declare that they will fend off the feds with a hail of bullets (particularly in light of the "No, over my dead body" option). Unsurprisingly, mission accomplished.


How about you go troll elsewhere rather than constantly being up on my e-penis all the time?

I seriously wonder if you have some notification setup so you can reply to my posts with multiple paragraphs of 2nd year law student drivel that essentially says the same thing over.. and over.. and over. You need to take this to L&R rather than follow me around in P&N and OT. Personally I kind of like the attention, but it brings down the quality of our dear forum.
 

Brovane

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2001
5,647
1,911
136
I suspect that if the following would happen.

#1- The 2nd Amendment was repealed by a new Amendment or SCOTUS changes it mind and declares that the 2nd Amendment is no longer a individual right.

#2- The government was to declare that if you turn in your guns you get X amount of compensation during this time period. However after the time period has expired no more compensation and if you are found to have weapons in your home you will be charged with a felony for each firearm most people would probably turn in their guns.

I think some people talk a big game but when faced with either a felony criminal charges or turn in your guns for compensation probably a good % would turn them in.

However this type of scenarion is extremly unlikely. I suspect that their is enough states that support gun right there wouldn't get enough states to ratify a new Amendment to repeal the 2nd Amendment.

However since the original Heller decision was close 5-4. I suspect that at some point depending on SCOTUS appointments that this could be revisited and it could go the other direction in the future. This could open the door to further restrictions.
 

IceBergSLiM

Lifer
Jul 11, 2000
29,932
3
81
it would be an unenforeceable law hence poll is irrelevant.

Laws require en"force"ment agents, there is no police body that I know of that has the size and resolve to sieze ~300 million weapons from ~80 million weapons owners.
 
Sep 7, 2009
12,960
3
0
it would be an unenforeceable law hence poll is irrelevant.

Laws require en"force"ment agents, there is no police body that I know of that has the size and resolve to sieze ~300 million weapons from ~80 million weapons owners.


They already somewhat successfully did this in new orleans with katrina.

It might be an unenforceable law this very moment, but I suspect we will see a push for this during most of our lifetimes.
 

IceBergSLiM

Lifer
Jul 11, 2000
29,932
3
81
I suspect that if the following would happen.

#1- The 2nd Amendment was repealed by a new Amendment or SCOTUS changes it mind and declares that the 2nd Amendment is no longer a individual right.

#2- The government was to declare that if you turn in your guns you get X amount of compensation during this time period. However after the time period has expired no more compensation and if you are found to have weapons in your home you will be charged with a felony for each firearm most people would probably turn in their guns.

I think some people talk a big game but when faced with either a felony criminal charges or turn in your guns for compensation probably a good % would turn them in.

However this type of scenarion is extremly unlikely. I suspect that their is enough states that support gun right there wouldn't get enough states to ratify a new Amendment to repeal the 2nd Amendment.

However since the original Heller decision was close 5-4. I suspect that at some point depending on SCOTUS appointments that this could be revisited and it could go the other direction in the future. This could open the door to further restrictions.

I think your sorely mistaken. They have really kicked a hornets nest with these attacks on gun rights for lawful citizens. Americans will highly resent the scenarios your propose and will not bow down.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
66
91
How about you go troll elsewhere rather than constantly being up on my e-penis all the time?

I seriously wonder if you have some notification setup so you can reply to my posts with multiple paragraphs of 2nd year law student drivel that essentially says the same thing over.. and over.. and over. You need to take this to L&R rather than follow me around in P&N and OT. Personally I kind of like the attention, but it brings down the quality of our dear forum.

Don't flatter yourself. Just because I point out the silliness of, say, one in every 50-100 of your posts doesn't mean I am "being up on your e-penis," whatever that means. Not sure why you're jumping right to the romantic angle, though I guess that suggests you are intrigued by what you see as the flattering attention of a man.

I do find it funny that you drag out the "second-year law student" thing every time I post, despite the fact that nothing I posted in this thread (nor most threads) relates to the application of the law.

And to return to the topic (rather than belaboring your trolling of your own thread), yes, this poll is silly and pointless. I note IcebergSlim said the same thing, yet you don't seem to be accusing him of wanting your "e-penis."
 

Brovane

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2001
5,647
1,911
136
This poll is silly in that there is no reason whatsoever to believe the federal government would or could (at least in the foreseeable future) pass legislation calling for a turn-in. It seems to me this poll is just a dog whistle to get people to pull out their e-peens and declare that they will fend off the feds with a hail of bullets (particularly in light of the "No, over my dead body" option). Unsurprisingly, mission accomplished.

In the 1980's New York City did in-fact call for a turn-in of certain semi-automatic rifles. They actually used the registration rolls that they had required back in the 1960's when they required these rifles to be registered. So they first required the weapons to be registered and then a couple of decades later used the same registration rolls to follow through on a gun turn-in. This past incident is where a lot of the concern starts that gun registration would lead to a gun turn-in/confsication.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |