To shuttleboi/mill/andyb23
Well, ok, this thread, except for all the flaming and stuff, was actually a bit informative.
I was first 100% on the side of the police.
After you three flamed me for what I initially believed in, I do see your point that they should not have used excessive force. (although, I don't believe that calling me stupid and dumbass and stuff was warranted, so I did the same )
But, I want to believe in strong deterrence. Even though the cops here may have overreacted, we all shouldn't just land ourselves on the extreme sides of this issue as I have initially.
The kid, obviously did something wrong. He disturbed the peace, and police have been rightfully called.
The kid also resisted, and was extremely resistant to the demands of the cops.
I am not going to pity the kid whatsoever at all. he did wrong, and he probably got the really bad end of his actions, which he could have avoided.
The cops probably should NOT have tazered the kid. Since non of us was there, we really do not have a good say to what should have or should not have happened.
I UNDERSTAND now why he shouldn've have been tazered, as nowadays, it is seen as a controversial weapon that is percieved to be very harmful (which it isn't, unless in extreme cases). However, it was extremely effective to keep the kid at bay from potentially doing any harm to the officers.
Should the officers wrestled him to the ground, giving him week-long bruises, or tazer him, which gives him no short-to-long term effects? That's totally up to perception though.
The kid was already on the way out, BUT, he was stupid to be an ass about it. He should have left quietly, while the officers held him. He shouldn't have yanked himself away, which could only mean that he is possibly trying to run away from the officers.
The officers (given that it was late at night, probably had enough of this BS), tazered him.
If they were more calm, and assessed the situation for about a couple more seconds, then they probably wouldn't have tazered him.
It was a kneejerk reaction from the officers, and it's that reaction that is causing this outrage.
I still symphatize more w/ the officers than that dumbass of a kid, but, I do have to agree now that an alternative, calmer action may have been more suitable given the situation. But you can see why the officer tazered him. The kid did something that probably indicated to the officers that he was about to be really physical, or run away.
The kid should gain NO symphathy, but at the same time, the officers in question should review their actions, and learn from this experience.