HardcoreRobot
Lifer
- Nov 7, 2000
- 16,403
- 3
- 81
Originally posted by: DLeRium
Originally posted by: Eghck
Originally posted by: chrisg22
Originally posted by: Eghck
disclaimer: I don't know crap about tasers, and Im not a cop.
I don't know why the kid didn't just get up after that 1st tase. He was able to go on that rant about justice or whatever. Seems like he could have stood up. Still 5 times was excessive. If a bouncer can kick a drunk guy out of a club, why couldn't they carry this guy out?
police officers aren't bouncers.....
well I meant, are police not allowed to carry someone out?
Thats what I was wondering. Bouncers will kick you out but not taser you and whack you with a baton unless you're trying to fvck with them. So why couldn't the cops just drag him out?
Originally posted by: BD2003
Originally posted by: Mark R
What was he being arrested for?
I was under the impression that you could not be arrested for trespass - you could only be removed if a court issued a restraining order requring you to leave. Maybe that doesn't apply in CA.
You sure you're not confusing trespassing with loitering? Tresspassing will likely get you instantly arrested, anywhere.
Anyways, I only have one thing to say about all of this: LOL. As soon as he mentioned the patriot act, I was happy to hear him get tazed a few more times.
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Originally posted by: DLeRium
Originally posted by: Eghck
Originally posted by: chrisg22
Originally posted by: Eghck
disclaimer: I don't know crap about tasers, and Im not a cop.
I don't know why the kid didn't just get up after that 1st tase. He was able to go on that rant about justice or whatever. Seems like he could have stood up. Still 5 times was excessive. If a bouncer can kick a drunk guy out of a club, why couldn't they carry this guy out?
police officers aren't bouncers.....
well I meant, are police not allowed to carry someone out?
Thats what I was wondering. Bouncers will kick you out but not taser you and whack you with a baton unless you're trying to fvck with them. So why couldn't the cops just drag him out?
They....shouldn't.....have.....to. And refusing to walk when they tell you, if you can, is resisting arrest. I don't want the cops who are supposed to respond to a call I make being delayed because they're dragging some idiot a half mile back to their cars.....maybe hurting one of their lower backs in the process. You dragged any 200 pound guys lately?
Originally posted by: DLeRium
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Originally posted by: DLeRium
Originally posted by: Eghck
Originally posted by: chrisg22
Originally posted by: Eghck
disclaimer: I don't know crap about tasers, and Im not a cop.
I don't know why the kid didn't just get up after that 1st tase. He was able to go on that rant about justice or whatever. Seems like he could have stood up. Still 5 times was excessive. If a bouncer can kick a drunk guy out of a club, why couldn't they carry this guy out?
police officers aren't bouncers.....
well I meant, are police not allowed to carry someone out?
Thats what I was wondering. Bouncers will kick you out but not taser you and whack you with a baton unless you're trying to fvck with them. So why couldn't the cops just drag him out?
They....shouldn't.....have.....to. And refusing to walk when they tell you, if you can, is resisting arrest. I don't want the cops who are supposed to respond to a call I make being delayed because they're dragging some idiot a half mile back to their cars.....maybe hurting one of their lower backs in the process. You dragged any 200 pound guys lately?
I'm almost certain it wouldn't be half a mile and they would just drive up to the entrance of hte library. At most it's like 500 feet or something. You waste just as much time tasering the guy 5 times who doesn't even want to walk EITHER WAY and then having to deal with rowdy students. IF you just dragged him out (2 guys is enough to drag the guy out, and obviously there were more than 2 officers), you could get him out in a more TIMELY FASHION than you woudl if you tasered him. Plus this wouldn't make the front page of the Daily Bruin and it would NOT result in a 300 post discussion on ATOT. If I were one of hte officers, I would've spoken up and done something.
It's just pure humiliating to yell STAND UP 300 times. I mean are you stupid? If the guy isn't going to stand, will yelling 300 times do a thing? If the guy doesn't respond to multiple taser shots, is he going to move? Just drag him out. It's like trying to get a dead animal to move. Good job geniuses.
Originally posted by: MisterJackson
In real life dude, if a cop tells you to do something, just do it, whether you like it or not. If you feel the need to argue your point with them then you simply deserve what you get because common sense dictates that even IF, and a big IF here, even if you are right once you argue with a cop he has more power and authority than you and will excercise it.
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Originally posted by: Mill
I think the difference is he was leaving when they grabbed his arm (at least according to the paper). That was probably unnecessary and inflamed the situation. Part of being an authority figure is knowing how to peacefully resolve situations and not flanning the flames of a fire.
I think it was very necessary. I'm curious what somebody would be doing with unauthorized access to the Internet and why what he was doing was so important that he defied requests to leave. I'm sure the cops were curious too and may have asked him a couple quick questions before walking him outside. Cops also usually run your ID whenever they stop you for anything down to jaywalking just to check.
Originally posted by: Mill
He wasn't unauthorized. He was a student at the University. He simply didn't have his ID.
Originally posted by: DLeRium
Question for UCLA students: Is the Daily Bruin an independent newspaper? I know the Daily Cal is, but yea.. just wondering.
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Originally posted by: Mill
I think the difference is he was leaving when they grabbed his arm (at least according to the paper). That was probably unnecessary and inflamed the situation. Part of being an authority figure is knowing how to peacefully resolve situations and not flanning the flames of a fire.
I think it was very necessary. I'm curious what somebody would be doing with unauthorized access to the Internet and why what he was doing was so important that he defied requests to leave. I'm sure the cops were curious too and may have asked him a couple quick questions before walking him outside. Cops also usually run your ID whenever they stop you for anything down to jaywalking just to check.
He wasn't unauthorized. He was a student at the University. He simply didn't have his ID.
Originally posted by: Corporate Thug
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Originally posted by: Mill
I think the difference is he was leaving when they grabbed his arm (at least according to the paper). That was probably unnecessary and inflamed the situation. Part of being an authority figure is knowing how to peacefully resolve situations and not flanning the flames of a fire.
I think it was very necessary. I'm curious what somebody would be doing with unauthorized access to the Internet and why what he was doing was so important that he defied requests to leave. I'm sure the cops were curious too and may have asked him a couple quick questions before walking him outside. Cops also usually run your ID whenever they stop you for anything down to jaywalking just to check.
He wasn't unauthorized. He was a student at the University. He simply didn't have his ID.
How were the authorities supposed to know that he was a student without an ID?
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Originally posted by: Mill
I think the difference is he was leaving when they grabbed his arm (at least according to the paper). That was probably unnecessary and inflamed the situation. Part of being an authority figure is knowing how to peacefully resolve situations and not flanning the flames of a fire.
I think it was very necessary. I'm curious what somebody would be doing with unauthorized access to the Internet and why what he was doing was so important that he defied requests to leave. I'm sure the cops were curious too and may have asked him a couple quick questions before walking him outside. Cops also usually run your ID whenever they stop you for anything down to jaywalking just to check.
He wasn't unauthorized. He was a student at the University. He simply didn't have his ID.
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: Corporate Thug
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Originally posted by: Mill
I think the difference is he was leaving when they grabbed his arm (at least according to the paper). That was probably unnecessary and inflamed the situation. Part of being an authority figure is knowing how to peacefully resolve situations and not flanning the flames of a fire.
I think it was very necessary. I'm curious what somebody would be doing with unauthorized access to the Internet and why what he was doing was so important that he defied requests to leave. I'm sure the cops were curious too and may have asked him a couple quick questions before walking him outside. Cops also usually run your ID whenever they stop you for anything down to jaywalking just to check.
He wasn't unauthorized. He was a student at the University. He simply didn't have his ID.
How were the authorities supposed to know that he was a student without an ID?
Shocking as it may seem, they could have asked him to go get it and until then leave the lab.
I still don't understand why UCLA doesn't have a login system. We do, and it prevents a non-Uni student from using the labs. There are even labs segregated by major, so that only people of a certain major can use a specific lab. Most of the labs aren't segregated, but some are.
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Originally posted by: Mill
He wasn't unauthorized. He was a student at the University. He simply didn't have his ID.
Not having his ID is what made him unauthorized.
Originally posted by: PurdueRy
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Originally posted by: Mill
I think the difference is he was leaving when they grabbed his arm (at least according to the paper). That was probably unnecessary and inflamed the situation. Part of being an authority figure is knowing how to peacefully resolve situations and not flanning the flames of a fire.
I think it was very necessary. I'm curious what somebody would be doing with unauthorized access to the Internet and why what he was doing was so important that he defied requests to leave. I'm sure the cops were curious too and may have asked him a couple quick questions before walking him outside. Cops also usually run your ID whenever they stop you for anything down to jaywalking just to check.
He wasn't unauthorized. He was a student at the University. He simply didn't have his ID.
Go drive a car without your license and/or insurance....then tell the cop that you are authorized and he can't take action against you...see what happens
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: Corporate Thug
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Originally posted by: Mill
I think the difference is he was leaving when they grabbed his arm (at least according to the paper). That was probably unnecessary and inflamed the situation. Part of being an authority figure is knowing how to peacefully resolve situations and not flanning the flames of a fire.
I think it was very necessary. I'm curious what somebody would be doing with unauthorized access to the Internet and why what he was doing was so important that he defied requests to leave. I'm sure the cops were curious too and may have asked him a couple quick questions before walking him outside. Cops also usually run your ID whenever they stop you for anything down to jaywalking just to check.
He wasn't unauthorized. He was a student at the University. He simply didn't have his ID.
How were the authorities supposed to know that he was a student without an ID?
Shocking as it may seem, they could have asked him to go get it and until then leave the lab.
I still don't understand why UCLA doesn't have a login system. We do, and it prevents a non-Uni student from using the labs. There are even labs segregated by major, so that only people of a certain major can use a specific lab. Most of the labs aren't segregated, but some are.