Originally posted by: DanTMWTMP
Originally posted by: Andyb23
Originally posted by: shuttleboi
Originally posted by: I Saw OJ
Originally posted by: shuttleboi
These policemen stepped over the line. Those of you who agree with the police most likely don't even have a college education, so just shut your mouths. The police work for us, not the other way around. These guys should be sued for $10 million apiece, fired, and possibly caned.
People who make comments like this are still in highschool and have no idea how the real world works.
The real world works like this: I have a job. I pay taxes. I live in a country where there is a constitution. The police take pledges to protect the populace. They are paid with my taxes. My taxes are not meant to be used to excessively tazer people.
Capiche, mother ******?
Haha Capiche bro.
I don't pay for police officers doing this crap in Mississippi, Massachusetts or wherever.
Officers should not discriminate against anyone. Be it someone who has no criminal background, and someone who did. What if it was some thug in that situation. No one would've complained. Officers SHOULD NOT change tactics depending on the person they see at hand. Every person is potentially dangerous, so no risk should be taken.
The officers did what they were TRAINED TO DO, they FOLLOWED protocol, and there should be only a single set of protocol to be followed given that particular situation.
It should not matter on the physical appearance of the person.
That person was a percieved threat to UCLA because:
1) did not have proof to be a UCLA student. potentially using UC resources for free.
2) since he did not have proof of being a student, he should not be around campus. I've heard a whole bunch of stories of non-affiliates doing crime @ UCSD campuses. If they are not students,
they have no goddamn business to be on campus.
So to prevent any possible senario, he had to be escorted out. Everything was done as they were trained to do.
Goddamn people, get a fvcking clue.