Why PhysX on High with GTX580 in Batman: AC ?
Why PhysX on High with GTX580 in Batman: AC ?
HardOCP "benchmarks". Did they insist fairy dust be in the air before they started each time, and that the sun and moon is aligned correctly before "true" benchmark was attainable?
I bet he had to redue the benchmarks 100x because he farted in the room and threw the results off by temp variance.
Be serious, nVidia is casted in a bad light. Of course the Sun and the Moon weren't properly aligned. There is no other plausible explanation...
Unless...
[H]ardOCP is now part of the AMD Shill Factory.
Remember, the 7970 is barely faster than the 580!
This chart is proof!
Just saying the way he cries about benchmarking correctly, like he knows better than other sites i take his with a grain of salt. Might as well through in a + or - %10-20 to everything he does.
Stock vs Overclocked, 40nm vs 28nm...
If I were to tell you a 32nm i5-2500k could overclock higher, and perform better than 45nm i5-750 would you think I was stating the obvious, or bring something new and revolutionary to the table?
It's a nice card, it's good to see progress.. Though that is to be expected. I'll wait to call it the second coming of the messiah until I see it compared to another 28nm product. I already have more than double the performance of a single stock 580 when not cpu limited, so I can actually wait awhile for that product, maybe even 8xxx from AMD.
Why PhysX on High with GTX580 in Batman: AC ?
When SLI scales properly and if you are not sensitive to input lag.....
Stock vs Overclocked, 40nm vs 28nm...
If I were to tell you a 32nm i5-2500k could overclock higher, and perform better than 45nm i5-750 would you think I was stating the obvious, or bring something new and revolutionary to the table?
It's a nice card, it's good to see progress.. Though that is to be expected. I'll wait to call it the second coming of the messiah until I see it compared to another 28nm product. I already have more than double the performance of a single stock 580 when not cpu limited, so I can actually wait awhile for that product, maybe even 8xxx from AMD.
Geez guys... this really doesn't have to be about AMD vs Nvidia, there is nothing to get defensive about. All it shows is how much faster the 7970 can be than the previous gen fastest single GPU. If someone has a GTX580, and is thinking about the 7970, this gives them a good idea of how much faster it can be. That's all, nothing more. Nothing to argue about. The 7970 is a newer card on a more advanced process than the GTX580, it should be faster. But someone may wonder how much faster it can be, that's all this is.
Geez guys... this really doesn't have to be about AMD vs Nvidia, there is nothing to get defensive about. All it shows is how much faster the 7970 can be than the previous gen fastest single GPU. If someone has a GTX580, and is thinking about the 7970, this gives them a good idea of how much faster it can be. That's all, nothing more. Nothing to argue about. The 7970 is a newer card on a more advanced process than the GTX580, it should be faster. But someone may wonder how much faster it can be, that's all this is.
Yeah my 470's @ 960 core tear it up when I compare them to the 4870x2 at stock.
How would you know? You don't have a 2560x1600 display, which is what those benchmarks were run at.
No, no, no. This is about how my multiple cards from the past process are faster than one card from the next.
Excuse me while I get out my benchmark folder, my 3 480s destroy this 1 7970 and I've got to make you aware of this.
Just having some fun.
That is some serious pwnage right there.
Kepler faces a pretty big increase in performance over Fermi to bridge or beat it.:thumbsup:
Check these overclock numbers from Rage3D