- Jun 25, 2004
- 60
- 0
- 0
They do provide a 7900 GT vs. 7800 GT vs. X1800 XL that at least tells you the difference in playable settings with eachOriginally posted by: GTaudiophile
I would like some direct 7800GT vs. 7900GT comparisons. Too bad I didn't wait like 4 weeks on my videocard purchase Oh well.
Its funny I find the XT winning BF2, FEAR and SC in every other reviews .. typical Hardocp.Originally posted by: moonboy403
wow...is it just me or did nvidia beat out or evened the xtx in most situation?!
Wow, did they actually say that? OMG !Originally posted by: HardOCP
If you?ve currently own a X1900 XT or XTX, stick with it. Those are great performing video cards and nothing here is enticing enough to move from them.
Originally posted by: fierydemise
I love Hardocp's reviews but they need to be complimented by a standard benchmarking to really understand what a the video card can do, before making any judgement I'll wait for a more usual review.
Originally posted by: Cookie Monster
Although the ATI's X1 series using 6.3, we have to point out that NV is using beta drivers. Hmm, where are those FW 85 drivers..
Originally posted by: Jazzatola
I'm planning on getting a 2407 when they're finally available so based on this article, looks like I might need some 7900 GTX SLI action too!!!
Shame about the texture shimmering though.
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
nVidia's mouthpiece (HardOCP) isn't the best place for reviews. Hardware France used Cat 6.3's in their evaluation: http://www.hardware.fr/articles/612-3/nvidia-geforce-7900-gtx-gt.html
That's looking like the fastest option on the planet. Too bad nForce 5 won't be out till June.Originally posted by: Jazzatola
I'm planning on getting a 2407 when they're finally available so based on this article, looks like I might need some 7900 GTX SLI action too!!!